Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/13/2010 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB20 | |
| HB344 | |
| HB52 | |
| HB354 | |
| HB168 | |
| HB306 | |
| HB114 | |
| HB186 | |
| HB319 |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 20 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 344 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 52 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 354 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 168 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 306 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 114 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 186 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 319 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 315 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 306(RES)
"An Act declaring a state energy policy."
Representative Bryce Edgmon, Sponsor, explained that the
bill would create a statewide energy policy. The bill is a
product of a working group from the energy sector of
Alaska. It ties together all the facets of energy moving
forward in the 21st Century, including conservation,
efficiency, renewable and non-renewable energy, and
community-level involvement. The bill addresses the fact
that Alaska is a resource development state and energy is
tied to economic development. He pointed out the
legislative intent language in the bill. The bill passed
the House unanimously and has a zero fiscal note.
Co-Chair Stedman noted one zero fiscal note by the House
Energy Committee.
10:04:51 AM
CHRIS ROSE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, RENEWABLE ENERGY ALASKA
PROJECT (REAP), testified in support of HB 306. He
explained the process of working on the bill and how
consensus was attained. He stressed the importance of the
bill due to the fact that the state does not have an energy
policy. The goal of the bill was to provide a framework or
vision in which to put strategic goals. Those goals can be
implemented through projects. He listed the benefits of the
bill, which promotes both renewable and non-renewable
alternative fuels. Energy efficiency and conservation is
foremost. The bill also supports training and workforce
development and works on coordinating government functions
so that the goals can be efficiently implemented.
10:07:48 AM
STEVE HAAGENSON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALASKA ENERGY
AUTHORITY, testified in favor of HB 306.
Co-Chair Stedman pointed out that the bill targets 50
percent of the state's electrical generation to be from
renewable energy sources by 2025. He questioned where the
state currently is and how that goal might be attained.
Mr. Haagenson reported that the state is currently at 24
percent energy from renewable sources, including hydro
electricity. He stated that it was a realistic goal. He
talked about the Railbelt's renewable resource plan.
Co-Chair Stedman commented that there was currently $10
million in the capital budget for hydro electric projects.
Mr. Haagenson agreed. He added that there is a goal to
develop renewable energy plans for each community in
Alaska, not just Southeast and the Railbelt.
10:11:19 AM
Co-Chair Stedman asked if there had been much integration
with the idea of a bullet line or a major gas line and gas-
fired electric turbines. Mr. Haagenson responded with
information on natural gas energy in the Railbelt. He noted
that the bill does not include bullet lines or pipelines.
Senator Thomas requested further explanation of the 24
percent. Mr. Haagenson state that only .3 percent is non-
hydro; the majority is hydro-driven.
BRIAN BJORKQUIST, SENIOR ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, LABOR
AND STATE AFFAIRS SECTION, DEPARTMENT OF LAW (via
teleconference), introduced himself.
Co-Chair Stedman asked what exposure Alaska has if the 50
percent goal is not met by 2025. Mr. Bjorkquist reported
that that information is found in Section 1 of the bill,
which is part of the legislative intent. If the state did
not meet that goal, there isn't a statutory mandate or
liability that could arise. The legislative intent would
not have been met and the consequences would be political,
rather than legal in nature.
Mr. Bjorkquist made two additional comments. He said on
page 3, line 22, the word "national" is problematic. He
suggested deleting that word, otherwise the word may impose
upon the state an obligation to meet federal targets.
Mr. Bjorkquist addressed the goal of 50 percent. He
suggested it could be used to suggest that the policy
points would affect litigation. He suggested codifying it
in order to prevent unintended consequences.
10:16:51 AM
Senator Thomas asked about national issues and its affect
throughout the bill. He cited page 2, lines 15 and 16 as an
example. Mr. Bjorkquist concurred. He said that obligations
could cross over to other state agencies and be unintended
consequences.
HB 306 was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
10:18:20 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 168 Amendment 1 Ellis 041310.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 168 |
| HB 315 Proposed SCS Version R 041310.pdf |
SFIN 4/13/2010 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/13/2010 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/13/2010 2:30:00 PM |
HB 315 |