Legislature(2015 - 2016)BARNES 124
02/24/2016 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB304 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 304 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 304-ELECTRNC TAX RETURNS;TOBACCO & E-CIGS TAX
3:17:26 PM
CHAIR OLSON announced that the only order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 304, "An Act requiring the electronic submission
of a tax return or report with the Department of Revenue;
relating to the taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products; taxing
electronic smoking products; adding a definition of 'electronic
smoking product'; and providing for an effective date."
CHAIR OLSON opened public testimony.
3:18:30 PM
ISAAC HOWELL informed the committee he owns Cold Vapes 907 in
Anchorage and stated his opposition to HB 304, which would
increase his wholesale tax by 100 percent. He has five
employees, pays taxes and insurance on his business, and also
supports other businesses that would be affected, such as
delivery companies and other related businesses in Anchorage.
Cold Vapes 907 is a small family-run business and is not "big
tobacco" or "big pharmaceutical." In the U.S., smoking is the
leading cause of preventable deaths; however, nine million
former smokers have reduced or eliminated putting tobacco smoke
in their lungs by their use of vaping products. Mr. Howell
related his personal experience using a vaping device to quit
smoking. Passing HB 304 would shut down "local vape shops and
force smokers to struggle, as I did, to get the right setup."
He urged the committee not to pass the bill and put his family
out of business and cause his employees to lose their jobs.
Although vapers will continue to vape by ordering products
online, Mr. Howell pointed out that the state is currently
profiting from his business. He referred to a document provided
in the committee packet entitled, "Peering Through the Mist,"
which found no apparent concern for bystanders exposed to e-
cigarettes and vapor.
3:21:59 PM
SHEB GARFIELD said he is an avid vaper and previously smoked for
twenty years before he quit three years ago by using vapes. He
expressed his opposition to HB 304. The device he uses does not
contain nicotine, but under HB 304 the components would be
taxed, as would the e-liquid which is composed of propylene
glycol and flavorings. Mr. Garfield said he switched from
combustible tobacco to a vapor device for health reasons and to
save money; however, the tax would cause the e-liquid to double
in price. There are reserve e-liquids that cost from $20 to $40
per bottle wholesale, which would be double or triple the cost
of cigarettes, thus the tax would make it cheaper for people to
smoke than use e-cigarettes. He read from a document provided
in the committee packet entitled, "Electronic Cigarettes" that
advocated making alternative sources of medicinal nicotine
available to smokers as a non-medical alternative to tobacco.
Mr. Garfield concluded that taxing vaping devices and e-liquids
would cause a decrease in users and thereby more harm, such as
increased health care rates, which have decreased due to vaping
devices and vape shops in the state.
3:25:19 PM
STEVE MAPES said he was speaking on behalf of adults on the
Kenai Peninsula who have made the choice to vape instead of
smoke. He read from a document provided in the committee packet
entitled, "Peering Through the Mist," published in 2013, which
found that the threshold limit values (TLVs) of the contaminants
produced from the vapor of vapor devices were magnitudes below
the involuntary workplace exposure level established by the U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA). Mr. Mapes continued to read from the
document which concluded that Alaskan smokers who have switched
to vaping have saved thousands of dollars and enjoyed a positive
impact on their lives. He opined a draconian tax would severely
reduce Alaskans' choices for a better nicotine delivery system.
3:28:23 PM
WILLIAM BOYLES said he is strongly opposed to HB 304. He
started vaping two years ago after death of his father from
smoking-related illness. Mr. Boyles tried to quit smoking and
learned of a vape pen from his neighbor. He has been smoke-free
for two years and this has resulted in better health.
3:30:30 PM
EMILY NENON, Director, Alaska Government Relations, American
Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, described her experience
working on local and statewide tobacco tax policy in Alaska for
15 years. She pointed out that this issue first and foremost is
a public health measure that has the side benefit of reducing
costs to the state. The tax income would be of little help to
offset smoking attributable costs; in fact, the state health
department has reported that the costs of smoking in Alaska per
pack averages $20 per pack, thus the tax would not recoup said
cost. Ms. Nenon said her concern is not about revenue but is
focused on the impact of youth use; in the last 20 years there
has been a 70 percent decline in youth smoking in Alaska. In
addition, she characterized e-cigarettes, as a pediatric
epidemic. She expressed her best wishes for those who have been
able to switch from traditional cigarettes, however, e-
cigarettes are an unregulated product, and their contents are
unknown to consumers and retailers. More Alaska high school
students who smoke are using e-cigarettes and many products that
have been tested contain nicotine. She cautioned that the level
of nicotine can vary, although this is not a problem with the
retailers, but with the system. E-cigarettes are not an FDA
regulated cessation product. Ms. Nenon reminded the committee
that nicotine is a neurotoxin and a pesticide, and in any form
contributes to addiction in youth.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked for the meaning of pediatric
epidemic.
MS. NENON explained that she used the phrase because there is a
public health epidemic. She remarked:
In terms of, while not the same as a classic virus, it
is moving in the same manner of seeing this tremendous
uptick in e-cigarette use among youth, and then the
corollary being we're seeing this on the national
level, we'll know in another year when we have Alaska
data on this, seeing kids that are, have never smoked,
starting with e-cigarettes and moving into smoking.
We are already seeing that trend on a national level -
it's very disturbing.
3:37:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked for written information related
to the inaccurate labeling of the abovementioned products. He
then asked whether Ms. Nenon believes that using e-cigarettes
"beats tobacco."
MS. NENON clarified that a combusted cigarette has 69 known
human carcinogens and over 3,000 chemical compounds thus "it's
not actually difficult to be less harmful than the combusted
cigarette." She added that there are additional dangers of
toxins, volatile organic compounds, carcinogens specific to
tobacco, and ultrafine particles from heating the products.
3:39:07 PM
ANGELA CARROLL provided comments that were not on topic with the
published agenda of HB 304.
3:42:00 PM
JENNIFER VARGASON informed the committee that vaping saved her
family "from the ball and chain of tobacco use, and I'm thankful
for that." She, her husband, and her family are healthier now,
and she opined that the bill should not tax vaping products as
the same thing as tobacco products because vaping products do
not contain tobacco, and there is no combustion. Ms. Vargason
said that reports have found that vaping does not have the
harmful effects of smoking, and there are no concerns for
bystanders [report not provided]. The ingredients in e-liquids
are in everyday foods, and although e-liquids can contain
nicotine, studies have shown that nicotine is as safe as
caffeine [study not provided]. Ms. Vargason referred to an
article entitled, "Everything we know about nicotine wrong" that
said that nicotine helps certain conditions, and in some
demographics tobacco use is higher, which could be helped by
alternatives. She related her personal experience, using
tobacco since she was about 9 years old and unable to quit until
using vaping products; however, she has been tobacco-free since
December 2014, and feels much better. Ms. Vargason urged the
committee to reconsider HB 304.
3:44:48 PM
PATRICIA PATTERSON, Owner of the Lucky Raven Inc., stated her
opposition to HB 304. Ms. Patterson said HB 304 is not about
prevention or tobacco, but is primarily designed to generate
more revenue for the state, which is suffering from financial
issues; however, she pointed out that one-half of the taxable
items could be purchased from another state, which is directly
opposite of making more money for Alaska. Currently, her store
is one of three stores left in Alaska that sells premium cigars,
and cigars for personal use can be sold tax-free in any state.
She supported previous testimony that increasing taxes would
cause the vape industry to go away, as happened to the cigar
industry. Ms. Patterson expressed her desire to help the state
find needed revenue to fund programs, but increasing taxes or
taxing products that can be easily bought in another state is
not the way.
3:47:51 PM
CHAIR OLSON announced that public testimony would remain open.
[HB 304 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB304 Supporting Documents-Email and attachments-Marge Stoneking 02-19-16.pdf |
HL&C 2/24/2016 3:15:00 PM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Opposing Documents-Email-Mike Coons 02-23-16.pdf |
HL&C 2/24/2016 3:15:00 PM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Opposing Documents-Email-Malcohlm McBride-02-19-16.pdf |
HL&C 2/24/2016 3:15:00 PM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Supporting Documents-Email-Thomas Moran 02-23-16.pdf |
HL&C 2/24/2016 3:15:00 PM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Opposing Documents-Email-Dave West-02-22-16.pdf |
HL&C 2/24/2016 3:15:00 PM |
HB 304 |
| HB304 Opposing Documents-Email-David Day 02-24-16.pdf |
HL&C 2/24/2016 3:15:00 PM |
HB 304 |