Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
03/13/2024 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB358 | |
| HB254 | |
| HB278 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 358 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 254 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 278 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 278-ADMIN. REGULATION REVIEW DIVISION
2:29:14 PM
CHAIR VANCE announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 278, "An Act establishing the administrative
regulation review division."
2:29:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BEN CARPENTER, Alaska State Legislature, on
behalf of the House Special Committee on Ways and Means, sponsor
by request, chaired by Representative Carpenter, presented HB
278. He paraphrased the sponsor statement [included in the
committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Alaska's
economic growth is the worst in the nation. It is
imperative that we grow the private economy. One way
to do this is by decreasing the high regulatory burden
Alaskan's have when doing business.
In current law, AS 44.62 (Administrative Procedures
Act) allows for the Governor or Lieutenant Governor's
review of regulations, requires the Department of Law
to advise agencies on regulations, and requires public
notice and public comment. There is no specific
requirement for Legislative review of proposed
regulations, nor any action that the Legislature can
take on them. Also included in As. 44.62, government
corporations are exempt from the Administrative
Procedures Act.
HB 278 would establish an Administrative Regulation
Review Division, a vital mechanism to ensure
transparency, accountability, and efficiency in the
regulatory process within the State of Alaska. It also
Removes the Government corporations' exemptions from
regulatory review from law.
The Administrative Regulation Review Division will
serve as a permanent staff agency under the oversight
of the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee. Its
primary function is to facilitate thorough legislative
review of administrative regulations filed by the
Lieutenant Governor. This will be achieved through
comprehensive assessment of proposed regulations,
ensuring alignment with legislative intent, statutory
authority, and consistency with applicable laws.
The administrative regulation review division will be
tasked with several key responsibilities:
1. Reviewing all administrative regulations to ensure
they properly implement legislative intent.
2. Providing comments and recommendations to the
governor and state agencies on proposed regulations.
3. Investigating findings transmitted by standing
committees regarding regulations inconsistent with
legislative intent.
4. Promoting needed amendments or repeals of
regulations deemed inappropriate or outdated.
5. Recommending legislative action to annul
regulations found to be inconsistent with legislative
intent.
Furthermore, the Division will have the authority to
examine all administrative regulations, including
proposed adoptions, amendments, or orders of repeal.
It will provide expert commentary and recommendations
to the governor and state agencies, promoting
necessary amendments or repeals when regulations
deviate from legislative intent or fail to meet
statutory standards.
HB 278 aims to simplify regulatory compliance process,
ensure regulatory compliance with legislative intent,
and provide a mechanism for continuous improvement in
our regulatory framework. This will in turn create a
better business environment for our State.
2:35:30 PM
KENDRA BROUSSARD, Staff, Representative Ben Carpenter, Alaska
state Legislature, on behalf of the House Special Committee on
Ways and Means, sponsor by request, chaired by Representative
Carpenter, presented the sectional analysis [included in the
committee packet], which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Section 1 Adds language to conform to new
Administrative Procedures language added by this bill
to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA)
adjudication section of law.
Section 2 Removes the exemption for the Alaska Housing
Finance Corporation from the APA.
Section 3 Amends the Legislature statute to require
the legislature to review every proposed regulatory
action before the date the regulation is scheduled to
be adopted, amended, or repealed.
Section 4 Adds a language to the Legislature statute
to require standing committees to review proposed
regulatory actions and transmit its findings to a new
division under the Legislative Budget and Audit
Committee (LB&A) established by this bill.
Section 5 Amends Fiscal Note statute to include LB&A
in agencies deadline reporting requirements.
Section 6 Adds new language to the Legislature statute
allow the Legislative Affairs Agency to review
proposed regulations and to assign an attorney for
such review.
Section 7 Adds new sections to the Legislature statute
to create a permanent staff agency responsible to the
LB&A Committee for the purpose of providing
legislative review of administrative regulations filed
by the Lieutenant Governor, named the Administrative
Regulation Review Division. Allows the LB&A Committee
to hire staff and requires the Legislative Affairs
Agency to provide legal assistance to the new
Division. Gives the following powers to the Division:
(1) Require state officials to give full cooperation
to the Division,
(2) Examine all regulations to determine whether they
would properly implement legislative intent,
(3) Prepare and distribute reports and materials,
(4) Investigate findings submitted by a standing
committee, and
(5) If necessary, recommend that LB&A introduce
legislation to annul adoption of regulations.
Section 8 Removes the exemption for the Alaska
Aerospace Corporation from the APA.
Section 9 Removes the exemption for the Adak Reuse
Authority from the APA.
Section 10 Removes the exemption for the Alaska
Gasline Development Corporation from the APA.
Section 11 Removes the exemption for the Alaska
Permanent Fund Corporation from the APA.
Section 12 Conforming language for DNR state lands
statute APA requirements.
Section 13 Adds to Public Records statute exemptions
legal communications between the Executive and
Legislature regarding regulatory review.
Section 14 Conforming language.
Section 15 Conforming language.
Section 16 Adds to the Governor's requirements under
the APA to add issues raised by Administrative
Regulatory Review Division to reasons the Governor may
return a proposed regulation to an adopting agency.
Section 17 Adds to public notice requirements under
the APA that copies of proposed regulations be
furnished to the LLA when distributed to the public.
Section 18-20 Conforming language.
Section 21 Adds a new section to APA statute to
require the Lieutenant Governor to submit filed
regulations to the Administrative Regulatory Review
Division along with their fiscal notes, requires
agencies to submit proposed regulations to the Review
Division when submitted to the Governor, and gives the
Review Division 10 days to submit comments to the
Governor.
Section 22-26 Conforming language.
Section 27 Removes the exemption for the Alaska Energy
Authority from the APA.
Section 28 Adds to uncodified law that this Act
applies to adoption, amendment, or repeal of a
regulation that is first proposed on or after the
effective date of this Act.
2:39:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER explained that the legislature, while
in session, is mostly consumed with bills drafted during session
and has little time for regulatory review. He noted there would
likely be a fairly substantial fiscal note associated with
setting up a permanent division to do this task. Nonetheless,
he said if better, more efficient governance is the goal, there
should be a permanent division to review regulations that can be
costly in time and action within the public sector.
2:41:51 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER said he liked the legislation. He sought
asked whether Sections 3 and 4, which directed standing
committees to take certain action, would be considered intent
language.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER confirmed that the Regulatory Review
Division would not have the authority to direct legislators
within a standing committee to take action.
2:42:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked how the proposed legislation relates
to the "sunset commission bill."
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the two entities would be
completely different. The proposed sunset commission, composed
of commissioners appointed by the governor and the legislature,
would be created underneath the Office of the Lieutenant
Governor to review departments over time. Conversely, this
division would fall underneath the Legislative Budget and Audit
Committee for the purpose of reviewing new regulations.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY speculated that the staff would be entrusted
to do the work. He asked what would be expected of the
legislators and full-time staff.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER explained that if [the Regulatory
Review Division] were created, there would be staff, similar to
[Legislative Finance Division], with a mission and a director.
The division's work would be reported to the chair [of the
Legislative Budget and Audit Committee]. He likened the
proposed division to a standing committee with a full-time staff
existing under Legislative Budget and Audit Committee for
interim supervision to pursue regulatory review.
REPRESENTATIVE GRAY asked whether there would be a framework for
the division of labor.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the sooner it starts, the sooner
it's finished. He acknowledged that there would need to be a
division of effort and prioritization.
2:48:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER shared his understanding that there used
to be a special House committee for regulatory review. He
suggested creating a special or permanent standing committee for
regulatory review.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the focus of the Legislative
Budget and Audit Committee is work during interim, whereas for
standing committees, it's not. He argued that with a standing
committee, it could be a challenge to find initiative during the
interim.
REPRESENTATIVE SUMNER suggested that there could be value in
creating a standing committee to receive referrals for bills
promulgating the creation of new regulatory structures in
statute.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER acknowledged that, arguably, the same
effect could be achieved by creating a standing committee, but
there would still need to be full-time staff to do the work.
2:52:39 PM
REPRESENTATIVE C. JOHNSON recalled that the problem with the
[Administrative Regulation Review Committee] was the change in
membership every two years; consequently, certain vendettas
against certain things politicized the committee and hindered
its functionality and efficiency.
2:54:07 PM
CHAIR VANCE questioned the current process for regulation review
by the legislature.
REPRESENTATIVE CARPENTER said the process is spelled out in AS
04.25.182.
CHAIR VANCE questioned how the bill would impact the length of
time it takes to adopt new regulations. She asked the bill
sponsor to clarify the relationship between the proposed
division and the process of reviewing regulation in the next
bill hearing.
[HB 278 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 358 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFSH 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - v.A.pdf |
HFSH 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Alaska Broadcasters Association - Support of Policy.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 358 - Backup Document Articles & Research.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/25/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 358 |
| HB 254 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Slideshow Presentation.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Letters of Support.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Top 13 Age Verification APIs in 2023.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 254 - Age Verfication Petition.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |
| HB 278 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 278 - v.A.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 278 - Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 278 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM HSTA 4/23/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 254 - Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact.pdf |
HJUD 3/13/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 254 |