Legislature(2017 - 2018)HOUSE FINANCE 519
02/13/2018 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB274 | |
| HB275 | |
| HB278 | |
| HB279 | |
| HB280 | |
| HB273 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 273 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 274 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 275 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 278 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 279 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 280 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 273
"An Act extending the termination date of the
Marijuana Control Board; and providing for an
effective date."
2:39:44 PM
Co-Chair Foster noted the bill had last been heard on
February 6, 2018 and had closed public testimony on the
same date.
CRYSTAL KOENEMAN, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE SAM KITO, provided
a brief description of the legislation. The bill would
extend the board six years. She believed the members' bill
files contained a letter from Erika McConnell, Executive
Director, Alcohol and Marijuana Control Office (AMCO) with
answers to committee members questions from the prior
meeting.
Representative Wilson had been disappointed the committee
had not heard from the Alcohol Beverage Control Board
(ABC). She asked to delay the bill to allow for a
discussion with both boards to understand how they worked
under AMCO. She stated the information had been confusing.
Co-Chair Foster asked if there were any other comments from
committee members on the issue.
Representative Kawasaki agreed there were lingering
questions. He recounted that AMCO had been created to
create efficiencies. He thought that there were some issues
that needed to be examined further.
2:42:32 PM
Ms. Koeneman did not believe there would be an objection
from the sponsor. She understood that the ABC board
extension bill was set to report out of the House Labor and
Commerce Committee shortly.
Representative Kawasaki requested the following information
be addressed the next time the bill was heard. He asked
about the startup general fund (GF) money for the marijuana
board and how the funds would be recovered through fees. He
requested further analysis on the marijuana board's
application process. Finally, he wondered how AMCO split
enforcement between both boards and who made the staffing
decisions regarding enforcement duties.
2:45:09 PM
Representative Wilson asked to hear from the department on
whether it was able to recoup the costs from all the boards
in general.
Vice-Chair Gara wanted to know why it would be another two
years before fees would cover the costs of operating the
marijuana board.
Representative Wilson asked why audits were covered by the
legislature. She thought boards would be more serious about
addressing the recommendations if they covered the audit's
cost. She noted that the cost of one particular audit was
$40,000. She wanted to know why the legislature did not
charge the audit costs back to the boards.
2:48:01 PM
Ms. Curtis answered that she had put some thought into a
memorandum she had sent regarding the cost of a particular
audit. She further explained that main purpose of the audit
staff was to complete the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report (CAFR) and the single audit each year. When the
division was not doing the specific CAFR work auditors
turned to other statutorily required audits and the audit
requests approved by the Legislative Budget and Audit
Committee (LBA). She maintained that there were no
additional costs to the agency for other audits; the
division still needed the same number of auditors to
perform the single and CAFR audits. She added that the
sunset audits were done with excess resources during slower
months. She characterized it as an opportunity costs
because there were other special audits that also could be
done outside the sunset process like performance or LBA
audits.
Representative Wilson clarified that she was not looking to
cut the division's budget. She was merely trying to
determine why the audits had been paid for by the
legislature.
HB 273 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.
Co-Chair Foster reviewed the schedule for the following
day.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 278 Audit Real-Estate-Appraisers-Final-Report-WEB.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB278 Sponsor Statement 1.25.18.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 278 |
| HB 279 Audit REC-Final-Report-WEB.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 279 |
| HB279 Opposition Letter 1.30.18.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 279 |
| HB279 Sponsor Statement 1.25.18.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 279 |
| HB279 Supporting Document - REC Letter of Support 2.10.18.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 279 |
| HB 280 Audit MFT-Final-Report-WEB.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 280 |
| HB280 Sponsor Statement 1.25.18.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 280 |
| HB 275 - Amendments.pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 275 |
| HB 273 HFIN Followup02.13.2018 .pdf |
HFIN 2/13/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 273 |