Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
02/06/2018 01:00 PM House MILITARY & VETERANS' AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB262 | |
| HB307 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 262 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 307 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 262-MILITARY SPOUSE COURTESY LICENSE
1:04:09 PM
CHAIR TUCK announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 262, "An Act relating to temporary courtesy
licenses for certain nonresident professionals; and relating to
the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic
Development."
1:04:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SCOTT KAWASAKI, Alaska State Legislature,
explained that HB 262 is a culmination of many discussions that
took place over several years regarding expediting temporary
courtesy licenses. In 2011, House Bill 28, [passed in the
Twenty-Seventh Alaska State Legislature], allowed expedited
temporary courtesy licenses for spouses of Armed Services
members so they could practice their profession without
experiencing extensive wait-times for licensure approval.
Similar legislation has passed in other states; however, several
states, such as the States of Washington and Connecticut,
include a reporting mechanism to the legislature and Joint Armed
Services Committees wherein the state can track the progress of
the executive branches' implementation of those occupational
boards. He noted that House Bill 28 did not include a reporting
requirement when it was enacted. In the Fall of 2017,
legislators voiced concern that the full implementation of House
Bill 28 was not yet completed and that not all occupational
boards were aware of the seven-year-old statute. While
questions remain, HB 262 simply seeks to strengthen the ability
of those military spouses in obtaining occupational licenses in
an efficient and expedited manner as prescribed by law. This
legislation seeks to amend Title 8 to include the Department of
Commerce, Community & Economic Development (DCCED) such that it
prepares an annual report of the courtesy licenses issued in the
previous fiscal year. He commented that this simple reporting
mechanism will help to facilitate communications between the
legislative branch, the executive branch, and the occupational
boards that oversee those licenses, he described. Thereby, he
said, this legislation will help facilitate those military
spouses in getting back into the workforce as quickly as
possible. The passage of HB 262 will improve communications
between those boards, the departments, and the legislature, and
it will improve the efficiency and awareness as to what
opportunities are available. He urged the support of this
corrective bill and described that it is in the best interest of
improving communications and accountability and helping those
military families transition into their new life in this state.
1:07:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to HB 262, Section 1, AS
08.01.063(f), page 2, lines 3-9, which read as follows:
(f) The department shall submit the report
prepared under (e) of this section to the Joint Armed
Services Committee on or before the first day of each
regular session of the legislature. In addition, the
department shall consolidate the two most recent
reports and submit a biennial report to the
legislature on or before the first day of the first
regular session of each legislature. The department
shall deliver a copy of the biennial report to the
senate secretary and the chief clerk of the house of
representatives and notify the legislature that the
report is available.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked why Representative Kawasaki
directed that the report go to the Joint Armed Services
Committee because if the report is also going to the senate
secretary and chief clerk, why does it need to go to the
committee.
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI responded that that is a technical
question for his staff member, William Jodwalis. He opined that
the purpose of the report going to the Joint Armed Services
Committee is because it will get to more legislators more
quickly. The report will also go to the senate secretary and
the chief clerk because "sometimes we do get those reports, and
other times we don't," he pointed out.
1:08:51 PM
WILLIAM JODWALIS, Staff, Representative Scott Kawasaki, Alaska
State Legislature, responded to Representative Saddler's
previous question and advised that the report would be presented
to the Joint Armed Services Committee annually. He explained
that it would be two reports during the first year, and the
second year would be bi-annually presented to the legislature.
The idea of the report being presented to the Joint Armed
Services Committee is so that the information can get to the
military community more efficiently. The information would be
passed on to legislators who may have districts that would more
directly be affected with the content of that report. As
Representative Kawasaki advised, this legislation is modeled
after the States of Washington and Connecticut, he reiterated.
1:10:07 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether the sponsor considered
drafting the legislation such that the one-year report would be
delivered to "everybody" one-year, and the two-year bi-annual
report would go "everybody" the second year, if the goal is to
provide the information to as many people as possible and in as
broad a reach as possible.
MR. JODWALIS answered that the sponsor would consider
Representative Saddler's suggestion.
1:10:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked the name of the sponsor of the 2011
House Bill 28 courtesy license bill.
MR. JODWALIS replied that he could get that information to the
committee.
1:11:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to the sponsor's statement that
this bill would increase communications between different boards
and commissions, and he asked how reporting to the legislature
would improve communications between boards and commissions.
MR. JODWALIS responded that the requirements of the report
direct that the department work with the boards in drafting the
report. He explained that the department would compile the
report after working with the various occupational boards,
determine what is being done, what better efforts could be taken
to fit the requirements of the report as outlined in the bill;
submit the report to the Joint Armed Services Committee; and to
the legislature bi-annually. The intent, he advised, is that it
would facilitate communications. He opined that the Department
of Defense suggested that those states experiencing difficulties
with the implementation of their military spouse occupational
licensure situation would review the examples of the States of
Washington and Connecticut.
1:12:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER suggested that rather than sending the
information solely to the boards authorized to issue a temporary
license, that the legislature might encourage "a little bit of
an initiative" by sending that notice to all of the boards with
the thought that they might decide to follow the same procedure.
He commented that he appreciates efforts to make the courtesy
license information more publicly available, and he noted that
he may come forward with an amendment to broaden the scope of
the distribution.
MR. JODWALIS thanked Representative Saddler for his suggestion.
CHAIR TUCK asked Representative Saddler to depict the boards and
commissions he would include in the potential amendment.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER responded that it is with regard to all
boards and commissions.
1:13:35 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked whether the sponsor anticipates a
fiscal note.
MR. JODWALIS answered that the sponsor does not anticipate a
fiscal note.
1:14:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to the sponsor's opening
statement that reporting would increase the activity of the
executive branch and asked whether that statement was under the
theory that if more people knew about it, they would take
advantage of this opportunity.
MR. JODWALIS replied that concerns were brought to the sponsor's
attention by the Department of Defense through the updated
preliminary funding of the Eielson Air Force Base Regional
Growth Plan. He noted that a focus group among military
families had taken place in order to determine the potential
challenges in moving to Eielson Air Force Base in light of the
arrival of the F-35s. He advised that included within the bill
packet is a comment regarding the challenges for anyone with a
license from a different state who is required to obtain a new
license or certification in Alaska. The point of House Bill 28
was to reduce the sort of challenges faced in 2011, and he
opined that the sponsor identified some of the issues.
Facilitating the department further and "getting their fingers
in those regulations and checking with their boards, that will
hopefully get us where we want to go," he offered.
1:15:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to HB 262, Section 1, AS
08.01.063(g), page 2, lines 13-16, which read as follows:
(g) ... The department shall encourage the boards
to designate a single employee to serve as the point
of contact for public information and inquiries
related to temporary courtesy licenses for military
spouses.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER advised that he previously worked on the
Alaska Boards and Commissions and each board does have such a
person, and he suggested that it might be helpful to make
certain they know the name of the contact person, and that the
person knows it is part of their duties.
1:16:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX noted that everything in this legislation
is a good idea but commented that it is sad the bill regarding
temporary licenses was passed in 2011, and the legislature had
to pass another bill to make certain the boards and commissions
actually understood "what we've done." It appears that
something slipped through the cracks of the executive branch
during a couple of administrations, and she asked whether the
administration should be advising its boards and commissions as
to what is available.
MR. JODWALIS commented that the sponsor asked himself those same
questions and opined that it was a matter of letting the
foundation settle a bit in order to see the cracks, and that
some of the cracks were not anticipated. For instance, a
licensed acupuncturist from another state would investigate
Alaska "acupuncturist license" on the internet, and the
expedited military spouse licensing information is listed off to
the side under "military licensing." Due to the spouse not
being military personnel, they may not think that the link off
to the side directly applies. Although, he pointed out, it is
necessary that the spouse follow that link in order to obtain
the additional paperwork and receive that expedited licensure
privilege. He offered that the report will reveal the cracks
and hopefully after everyone has reviewed the report, they will
be fixed.
1:19:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX commented that sometimes entities and
departments prepare reports on different issues and those
reports are not necessarily perused to the greatest extent
possible. She suggested that a concerted effort might be made
to work with the administration to try to determine how to
redesign a website, if that is the problem.
1:20:23 PM
CHAIR TUCK advised that the 2011 House Bill 28 was co-sponsored
by Representatives Bill Thomas, Bob Herron, and Eric Feige, all
of which are no longer serving in office.
1:20:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ referred to the previous testimony of
Sarah Chambers, Deputy Director, Workforce Investment Board, who
shared that 13,396 applications were submitted for certification
or licensure last year, of which approximately 70 were veterans
or military spouse-related. This, she offered, may be the case
of the "needle and the hay-stack" wherein a light could be shown
on the needle through HB 262, in order to elevate the issue and
keep it on everyone's mind. She added that when there are over
13,000 applications, there could be the natural propensity to
lean toward volume processing and less toward the exceptions.
This discussion, she pointed out, is about unique exceptions in
which to make note, and she commended the sponsor for bringing
the bill forward.
1:22:30 PM
FRED PARADY, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Commerce,
Community & Economic Development (DCCED), advised that he was
available for questions.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX opined that quite a few of these boards
and commissions from which people would like to obtain courtesy
licenses would be under the Department of Commerce, Community &
Economic Development (DCCED).
MR. PARADY offered to first provide a background, and explained
that the Division of Corporations, Business, and Professional
Licensing handles roughly 225,000 renewals for licenses or new
licenses each year, roughly 1/3 corporations, 1/3 businesses,
and 1/3 professional. Within the professional licensing
category, it has 43 professions that the legislature saw fit to
regulate, and 21 of those professions have boards.
1:23:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX surmised that House Bill 28 and the
presentation of HB 262 sheds some light on the fact that
military spouses are experiencing difficulties obtaining the
courtesy licenses enacted into law in 2011. She asked whether
Mr. Parady had suggestions to remedy the situation.
MR. PARADY advised that the department was certainly responsive
to 2011 House Bill 28, it has the department's attention, and
the department shares the eagerness to serve our military
personnel. After the enactment of House Bill 28, three best
practices were established by the Department of Defense, each of
which the Department of Commerce, Community & Economic
Development has enacted. He offered those best practice as
follows: licensure by endorsement or credentials; if the
credentials approximate the department's requirements; the
application then moves to temporary licensure for 360 days while
the person puts together the necessary paperwork; and those
military applications are expedited. He commented that the
department does have its focus on that "needle in the haystack"
and that it serves its residents. He directed the committee to
the department's webpage and acknowledged that "military
licensure" is a sidebar on its quick links because the
department puts everything that is "in common across those 43
professions in one link," and he would look to see whether that
could be [more user friendly]. That link "takes you to this
page, and it takes you to a one-page form that clarifies your
military status." Regardless of whether the person fills out
that form, during the time the department's examiners review an
application and observe anything military on the application,
the application goes to the top of the list. He noted that
relative to the Eielson Regional Growth Plan, there is a "Tiger
Team" that meets in Fairbanks regarding the upcoming growth with
the stationing of the F-35s. He advised that he was on the
telephone when the Eielson Regional Growth Plan was presented,
noted this potential problem, and spoke to the fact that the
department is supportive to the needs of military spouses,
veterans, and members to licensure. The department is focused
on the project, the problem, and it is happy to do better, he
offered.
1:26:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether this bill would help the
department do better and remain focused.
MR. PARADY advised that the department is neutral on HB 262, the
addition in statute of an annual reporting requirement is the
will of the legislature, communication is always a good thing,
and the department is a telephone call away and happy to report
to the legislature.
1:26:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to Mr. Parady's statement that
there are 43 professions and 21 of those have boards, he asked
how many boards or commissions currently offer military courtesy
licenses.
MR. PARADY responded that according to the data in front of him,
the list depicts 11 boards that do not offer military courtesy
licenses and typically that is because they either do not have
an exam requirement or they are unique licenses for Alaska. For
example, registered or assisted guide outfitters who must
demonstrate knowledge of Alaska's game law; game transporter who
has a reporting requirement in the transportation of big game;
marine pilots who step on board and take command of large ships
that might be traveling into a harbor unfamiliar to that
captain, or through the Wrangell Narrows, and so forth. The
boards that do not offer military courtesy licenses are limited
to specific reasons.
1:28:00 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER offered a scenario of a military spouse
availing themselves to one of these professional licenses, and
asked whether they pay a fee, and if so, is it credited to their
eventual permanent professional license.
MR. PARADY related that he would have to confirm his answer, and
he opined that they pay a fee just like any other applicant.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER noted that there are individuals with
professional licenses who certainly support the military but are
concerned about being asked to support the professional license
of a possible competitor.
1:28:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER referred to the question of whether this
bill would help the department "accomplish better" and asked
whether the department can accomplish better without the bill.
MR. PARADY reiterated that the department is neutral as to the
bill and it certainly has its attention focused here. Frankly,
he stated, within the Department of Commerce, Community &
Economic Development on the Commerce side, it is of keen
interest that the Fairbanks military expansion with the F-35s
growth plans come to fruition and bear fruit for Alaskans. He
explained that what he is trying to say is that the department
is paying attention.
1:29:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER requested clarification that the Division
of Corporations, Business, and Professional Licensing currently
does need a single person to serve as the point of public
contact, or whether that is a position to be redirected.
MR. PARADY deferred to Sara Chambers, Deputy Division Director,
because she is the lead. He related that across the 21 boards
there are approximately 150 or so members, and they go through a
new board member orientation and board training, and those
materials include reference to military licensing and its
specific requirements. He pointed out that the department tries
to build it into the front loading of its new board members.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked whether the committee would be able
to question Commissioner Robert Doehl or Sara Chambers.
CHAIR TUCK advised that Sara Chambers was not currently
available as she was testifying in other committees.
1:31:45 PM
ROBERT MR. DOEHL, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Military &
Veterans' Affairs (DMVA), advised he was available to answer
questions.
1:31:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked that when families arrive on base,
whether part of their orientation or procedure makes clear that
special courtesy licenses are available.
MR. DOEHL responded that there is not a mandatory briefing for
military spouses or children arriving on Alaskan bases as the
service members are required to attend briefings. Although, he
acknowledged that the service member may not advise their spouse
about the licenses but that is completely controlled by the
Department of Defense, and currently spouses are not briefed in
the United States locations.
1:33:10 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX surmised that there is not a mandatory
briefing or orientation for military spouses or children, and
she asked whether there is some sort of voluntary briefing for
those spouses who would like a briefing.
MR. DOEHL answered that they may, as an option, attend the end
briefing that their service member attends, but there is not a
briefing focused on the needs of the spouse in the new location.
1:33:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX commented that without making it a federal
case, so to speak, could there be a spouse briefing.
MR. DOEHL replied that the briefings or orientations given to
service members and their families arriving on Alaska's military
bases are controlled by the federal government, and the federal
government has not yet given Alaska sovereignty over those
briefings. At this point, the department could reach out to
Citizens Action Group or other groups in which Representative
Saddler regularly participates with JBER and ask the base to
consider that option. However, he said, it would be a federal
military decision as to what it offers.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER commented that there are an infinite
number of programs available that exchange information and
operate well that do not necessarily require a federal program.
1:34:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether the department offers any
type of publications as to the benefits available to veterans in
Alaska and the resources available for military spouses, while
acknowledging that is not the department's primary
responsibility.
MR. DOEHL answered that at this time the department does not
have publications tailored to military spouses in Alaska.
1:35:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD commented that this is an important
issue because the service member may receive a whole host of
information, but it is never distributed to the spouse. She
opined that there should be some sort of information
distribution system that offers awareness to the spouses because
there could be a communication gap.
MR. DOEHL responded that Major General Hummel can reach out to
the Alaska command (ALCOM) commander and the general officers in
the state to explore what mechanisms they may have available to
facilitate this issue.
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD asked Mr. Doehl to get back to the
committee with that information.
MR. DOEHL advised that he would get back to the committee or
Major General Hummel will be in Juneau and can discuss the
issue.
1:36:59 PM
CHAIR TUCK opened public testimony on HB 262.
1:39:01 PM
DALE VANDE HAY, Defense State Liaison Office, Military Community
and Family Policy, Department of Defense, advised that this is
an issue the Department of Defense has been working on as one of
its ten key issues throughout the years. He acknowledged that
the issues were "birthed somewhat" during the 2011 timeframe and
advised that the Defense State Liaison Office tries to help
military members and their spouses who relocate, whether they
are service members getting out of the service that wish to
settle in Alaska or spouses who arrive with their military
member to an installation in Alaska. He commented that he was a
support group commander at Elmendorf Air Force Base in the late
1990s, and he does have a frame of reference on the challenges
of moving to Alaska. This effort is probably the number one
challenge, even today, for those military spouses joining their
spouse as they move around the country. He advised that he is
one of eight liaisons who cover the 50 states and he can attest
to the fact that this problem has not gone away. This issue is
back because the Department of Defense was still hearing that
this was a problem even though all states had passed laws to
work through the issues of licensure by endorsement, temporary
license, and expedited processes, but it did not appear to be
getting better. Therefore, the Department of Defense
commissioned the University of Minnesota to prepare a report
examining military spouse licensure and the results across the
board were that more efforts could be taken. Granted, he said,
in the hearing two days ago on the whole issue of occupational
licensure, there was a lot of discussion about the issue of
academic credentials, and what the boards are or are not doing,
and this legislation will reinforce the need to give further
attention to this continuing dilemma. He advised that the base
has a spouse employment manager who is typically at either the
Army Community Services Center or the Army Family Readiness
Site, and they do everything they can to help a spouse access
their new location. Typically, when a person is a professional
spouse with a certification or a license, they know that their
license is controlled by the board in that state, and the person
would go to the board to have their license renewed or certified
in some manner. The onus is on the spouse to contact the board,
and he related that it is reassuring to hear that the boards are
doing everything they can to improve that process.
1:44:46 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER noted that his general experience is that
top vocations for military spouses tend to be teachers, real
estate agents, healthcare professionals, and businesses, and he
asked Mr. Vande Hay to relay the most likely vocations for
temporary licenses.
MR. VANDE HAY responded that the professions include the
professions Representative Saddler mentioned, and teachers and
nurses are in that category. There is an effort across the
country to advocate for interstate compacts which are currently
in the areas of physical therapy, emergency medical technicians,
nurses, and psychology professionals. The point being, he
offered, is that these interstate compacts, being populated in
all 50 states by those particular associations, are
opportunities for assistance for the military spouses. He added
that a University of Minnesota report zeroed in on particular
skills that are also needed and used by military spouses, such
as cosmetology, dental hygiene, massage therapy, mental health
counseling, occupational therapy, and real estate.
1:46:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked Mr. Vande Hay to repeat the
occupations.
MR. VANDE HAY advised as follows: massage therapy, dental
hygiene, cosmetology, physical therapy, emergency medical
services, nurses, and psychologists.
1:47:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH noted that in previous discussions the
question has been raised as to what is being done to accommodate
people with teaching credentials, which might not follow under
the Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development.
He asked what the legislature can do to facilitate a military
spouse's teaching credential and being able to teach in one of
Alaska's schools. He noted that Mr. Parady was shaking his head
no. Representative Parish then broadened his question to ask
what the other states are doing more effectively that Alaska
could model.
MR. VANDE HAY advised that this is another one of the Department
of Defense's issues because teachers do not fall under the
purview of these licensing compacts, and as to a temporary
certificate, the States of Indiana and Oregon provide a three-
year temporary certificate. He explained that when a teacher
arrives in one of those states, their initial qualifications are
required and sometimes they don't have all of the information,
such as state history. Those teachers are given a temporary
license for three years or eighteen months and then another
eighteen months, which is pretty much in the purview of House
Bill 28. Except, he noted, it does not cover teachers because
teachers are not under that bill. In the event the Department
of Education was rolled into this process and had that same
requirement, the person could be given the temporary
certificate, gather the paperwork or obtain the additional
credentials, and the license could be renewed after a certain
amount of time.
1:50:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked whether the list he had offered
was a finite list or an example list.
MR. VANDE HAY answered that the list was an example of the most
used populations of professional military spouses, but there are
other occupations.
1:51:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER offered an example of being married to a
plumber, a general contractor, or a profession of that nature,
and "you are the person getting transferred to Alaska in the
military" and those are the types of licenses your spouse would
hold, "are those excluded also?"
MR. VANDE HAY asked whether the question is if plumbers and
contractors are excluded.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER advised that he was interested in
general contracting and all of those types of licenses and
commented that he imagined they are excluded.
MR. VANDE HAY advised that it all depends on whether they are
currently covered by the Department of Commerce, Community &
Economic Development that handles most of those skills, but he
did not have a listing of those skills. In the event the desire
is to have those particular skills covered, then those
professional boards could be included in this process.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER asked Chair Tuck if there was a way "we
can get on a list from wherever it is supposed to come from?"
CHAIR TUCK opined that it would come from the Department of
Commerce, Community & Economic Development. He advised that
House Bill 28 is in front of him which is basically about
licenses, and he was unsure how far it went into professional
licenses. In the event someone had a contractor's license, he
said, he was unsure it would be easily transferred as it mostly
refers to professional licenses.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER said, dental hygienist.
CHAIR TUCK pointed out that that is a professional license. He
said he would try to obtain a list from the Department of
Commerce, Community & Economic Development.
1:53:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD referred to female service members
married to a general contractor who is following them around the
country and asked whether there are a rising number of female
service members.
CHAIR TUCK reminded the committee that it is currently under
public testimony and all questions should be directed to the
testifier and not to other witnesses.
1:54:49 PM
DAVID NEES, Alaska Policy Forum, offered appreciation for HB 262
because it offers the public a chance to review how the system
is currently working, and it appears that there are major issues
to consider. The Alaska Policy Forum noticed that a number of
military spouses with teaching credentials are working at the
private schools because "it requires too much money out of their
pocket" to train to become Alaska certified. He said, "We" do
have a temporary system for teachers, but it is only good for
one year and he suggested allowing, for example, one year with
one year out and then another one year out. In the event a
spouse arrives from overseas, there may have been a gap in their
teaching service because they were unable to teach in the local
schools overseas, but they still hold a professional license in
teaching. He reminded the committee that there is a shortage of
teachers in Alaska so anything "you can do to include that into
this process" would be helpful. The concentration of getting
the information out regarding professional licenses should not
be solely focused on the base; information should be given to
parents when they register their children at the local schools,
he suggested. He asked the committee to consider whether to
include teaching in one of the temporary licensures in order to
work in the State of Alaska. Currently, he said, most military
spouses with a degree in education are not working in the public
school system and are working in private school systems simply
because there are too many hurdles to jump when they know full
well that at some point, they will return home. This
legislation looks at whether the Department of Commerce,
Community & Economic Development is the best place to get
information about licensure out to the military.
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH asked whether a three-year temporary
license for those in the teaching profession would substantively
respond to the needs he had pointed out.
MR. NEES answered that it would, or to simply have a one-year
license.
1:59:23 PM
CHAIR TUCK, after ascertaining that no one wished to testify,
closed public testimony on HB 262.
[HB 262 was held over.]