Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 120
03/08/2010 01:30 PM House JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB238 | |
| HB334 | |
| HB71 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 238 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 334 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 238 - LANDLORD REJECTION OF OCCUPANT/SUBLEASE
1:34:50 PM
CHAIR RAMRAS announced that the first order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 238, "An Act removing the number of persons under
18 years of age in the household as a reasonable ground for a
landlord to reject a proposed sublease or assignment."
1:35:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CHARISSE MILLETT, Alaska State Legislature,
sponsor, explained that HB 238 would allow Alaska to comply with
the federal [Fair Housing Act] by deleting the provision in AS
34.03.060(d) that allows a landlord to refuse to consent to a
sublease or assignment based on the number of persons under the
age of 18 who are in the household. She referred to such
refusal as discriminatory, and noted that compliance with
federal law would allow Alaska to receive additional federal
funding for which it currently doesn't qualify. In response to
a question, she relayed that previously-adopted legislation made
a similar change to the statute pertaining to leases, and
explained that HB 238 is merely proposing the same sort of
conforming change to the statute pertaining to
subleases/assignments.
CHAIR RAMRAS, relaying that he is concerned that a young tenant
could have several people under the age of 18 move in with
him/her, questioned whether the term, "household" is defined in
statute.
REPRESENTATIVE MILLETT said she's not sure, but posited that the
bill wouldn't preclude a landlord from rejecting a potential
renter based on the age of those whom the renter would have move
in with him/her.
1:38:39 PM
MARK ROMICK, Director, Planning and Program Development, Alaska
Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC), Department of Revenue (DOR),
said that although there isn't a specific definition of the
term, "household" under the federal Fair Housing Act, that term
essentially includes anybody that's residing in the unit that's
covered by the lease. Therefore, people who are living together
in an apartment but who aren't immediate family members could
constitute a household as long as everyone is covered under the
lease. In response to questions, he explained that neither
Alaska's Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act nor the
federal Fair Housing Act make a distinction with regard to time
of residency or student status. Instead, the question becomes
whether a person is legally able to enter into a lease agreement
and whether a person is legally allowed to live in a particular
unit, and those issues are among those left up to the landlord
to address when considering whether to lease/rent a unit to a
particular person.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG observed that a letter in members'
packets from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) dated July 18, 2007, in part addresses the
provision that would be repealed by the adoption of HB 238:
"Such provision may be deemed contrary to federal regulations
and laws, as note more specifically under the Fair Housing Act
as amended." He questioned under what [legal] authority that
statement was made, and how the term, "familial status
discrimination" - as used elsewhere in that same letter - is
defined.
[Chair Ramras turned the gavel over to Vice Chair Dahlstrom.]
MR. ROMICK indicated that the [legal] authority behind that
statement could be found in the federal Fair Housing Act as
amended, under 42 U.S.C. 3601, and that [42 U.S.C. 3602(k)] says
[original punctuation provided]:
(k) "Familial status" means one or more individuals
(who have not attained the age of 18 years) being
domiciled with-
(1) a parent or another person having legal
custody of such individual or individuals; or
(2) the designee of such parent or other person
having such custody, with the written permission of
such parent or other person.
The protections afforded against discrimination on the
basis of familial status shall apply to any person who
is pregnant or is in the process of securing legal
custody of any individual who has not attained the age
of 18 years.
[Vice Chair Dahlstrom returned the gavel to Chair Ramras.]
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG observed that that federal definition
specifically references age, and surmised that a landlord could
still stipulate how the children in a household are to behave.
MR. ROMICK concurred, adding - in response to comments - that in
order to comply with the federal Fair Housing Act, Alaska's
Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act cannot contain any
reference to age.
CHAIR RAMRAS, after ascertaining that no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on HB 238.
1:46:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM moved to report HB 238 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, HB 238 was reported from the
House Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 01 HB 334 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 334 |
| 02 HB334 CS(MVA) v. S.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 334 |
| 03 HB334 Sectional.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 334 |
| 04 HB334-1-1-022410-CRT-N.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 334 |
| 05 HB334CS(MLV)-LAW-CIV-03-05-10.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 334 |
| 06 HB334 Support.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM SFIN 4/9/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 334 |
| 07 HB334 Bill v. R.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 334 |
| 01 HB238 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| 02 HB238 ver R.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| 03 HB238 Fiscal Note-CED-COM-2-11-10.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| 04 HB238 HUD Letter 7-18-07.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 238 |
| 05 HB238 AHFC Comments.pdf |
HJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
HB 238 |