Legislature(2017 - 2018)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/26/2018 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB195 | |
| HB120 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 195 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 120 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 195
"An Act relating to insurer actions based on credit
history and insurance scores at insurance policy
renewal; and providing for insurer consideration of
consumer requests for exceptions of credit history or
insurance scores."
9:03:29 AM
Co-Chair MacKinnon directed attention to HB 195. She
relayed that the bill had been heard in committee on the
previous Wednesday and heard public testimony.
LORI WING-HEIER, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF INSURANCE,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
stated that HB 195 amended credit scoring, which was
currently allowed in the state on new business for personal
lines for auto and homeowners. She stated that it did not
impact life insurance, health insurance, or commercial
lines. The bills allowed credit scoring to be used on the
renewal and new business. It allowed for the insurer to
provide to the consumer with written notice, when credit
scoring was used, and whether an adverse action was found
that would be detrimental to the consumer. At that point,
the insurer must tell the consumer that there was a right
for an appeal. The appeal would go for extraordinary life
circumstances, which were spelled out in the bill. The
consumer would appeal to the insurance company first, and
the second appeal would come to the Division of Insurance
for adjudication.
Senator Olson wondered why the amendment was not included
in the original credit score bill.
Ms. Wing-Heier replied that the bill allowed for the
insurance company to be the final adjudicator of the
appeal. It did not allow extraordinary circumstances to
include the provision related to a prudent person. The
governor did not feel that the consumer protections were
broad enough, so he vetoed the bill, and reintroduced it in
2017. She did not know why the drafters did not include the
broader protections in 2016.
9:06:25 AM
Co-Chair MacKinnon referenced a question from public
testimony on February 21, 2017 that concerned the
definition of a "new applicant." She wanted to ensure that
all applicants could use their credit score to help reduce
their premium.
Ms. Wing-Heier replied that the Division of Insurance would
not mandate that insurance companies use credit scoring.
Rather, if the company elected to use credit scoring, they
would use it on new business and renewal. She remarked that
Geico did not currently use credit scoring.
Co-Chair MacKinnon asserted that the renewal would be
included.
Ms. Wing-Heier answered in the affirmative.
Senator Stevens wondered whether there was proof that a
person with a low credit rating was more likely to have
accidents.
Ms. Wing-Heier replied that the statistics from the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and
other organizations showed a correlation to credit period,
and the actions an individual would take, such as
maintaining their house, good health, and driving record.
The credit score would become a part of the insurance
score.
Co-Chair MacKinnon asked Ms. Wing-Heier to discuss the
issue of families with no credit.
Ms. Wing-Heier stated that if an individual had no credit,
the individual would not be penalized.
Senator Olson had a hard time drawing a distinction between
not being put into a higher category.
Ms. Wing-Heier stated that if the insurers could not
determine a credit score, an induvial would not be in a
preferred program.
Co-Chair MacKinnon relayed that the original bill had
passed with overwhelming support before it was vetoed by
the governor.
Vice-Chair Bishop discussed FN1 from the Department of
Commerce, Community and Economic Development. He relayed
that the committee had covered the fiscal note.
Vice-Chair Bishop MOVED to report HB 195 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 195 was REPORTED out of committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with one new zero fiscal note from
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development.
9:12:39 AM
AT EASE
9:17:38 AM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 195 Background Document.pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Letter of Support McCue.pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Opposition Lynch.pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Support Letters.pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 195 |
| HB 195 Opposition Opheim.pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 195 |
| SB58 HB120 summary statement (01.22.18).docx |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 120 SB 58 |
| HB 120 presentation for SFIN (02.26.18).pdf |
SFIN 2/26/2018 9:00:00 AM |
HB 120 |