Legislature(2017 - 2018)GRUENBERG 120
05/04/2017 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB184 | |
| HB173 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 184 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 54 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 173 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 173-CLIMATE CHANGE COMMISSION
4:00:51 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 173, "An Act establishing the Alaska
Climate Change Response Commission; relating to the powers and
duties of the Alaska Climate Change Response Commission;
establishing the climate change response fund; and relating to
the surcharge on oil produced in the state."
4:01:16 PM
MEGAN HOLLAND, Staff, Representative Andy Josephson, Alaska
State Legislature, reviewed the changes introduced in the
committee substitute (CS) for HB 173, labeled 30-LS0163\R,
Bruce, 5/1/17 [hereafter referred to as "Version R"] on behalf
of Representative Josephson, prime sponsor, as follows: the oil
surcharge and state funding are removed from the Alaska Climate
Change Response Commission; Sections 1-4 relating to the oil
surcharge are removed; Section 44.19.666 creating the Climate
Change Response Fund is removed; the phrase, "in the climate
change response fund" is removed from Section 44.19.662; all
mention of state funding as sources of funding for the
commission are removed; and under the CS, the commission would
be operated through user fees and grant funding.
4:02:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked who the "users" would be in the
reference to user fees.
MS. HOLLAND replied that users would include government
entities, non-government entities, and non-profits -
organizations working in green energy and climate change
response. She maintained that the fees would be for grant
writing services provided by the commission, as well as other
forms of assistance.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked for confirmation that no entities,
including the state, would be required to use the services or
pay for anything if they decided that they did not want to use
the commission. She said, "This is all entirely voluntary ...."
MS. HOLLAND answered yes. She clarified that Version R states
that government entities and tribal organizations could not be
charged user fees.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX asked, "If it's all voluntary, why
wouldn't you just form a non-profit? Why do we need a bill to
do something which is ... totally voluntary that is going to
operate off of ... grant funds or people that think that it
provides a good service and [want] to use it?"
4:04:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ANDY JOSEPHSON, Alaska State Legislature,
responded that as a state commission, the Alaska Climate Change
Response Commission would be tasked with mitigation, grant
receipts, and coordination with other government and non-
government institutions. It would represent a statement of
public policy by the legislature that climate change is real and
seriously impacts Alaska. He maintained that a commission is
needed both to mitigate climate change and fund schools in
Newtok and Kivalina that are threatened. He said that it would
continue the work done by former Governor Sarah Palin's [Alaska
Climate Change Sub-Cabinet]. He added that it would model its
membership on the now defunct Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
commission by having local representation.
4:06:58 PM
MS. HOLLAND added that one of the primary purposes of the
commission is to support non-profits and other entities in the
effort, not provide the same services as non-profits. She
maintained that Alaska misses out on billions of dollars in
federal and private funds for [climate change related] efforts.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX referred to the proposed Section 44.19.652
[on page 3 of Version R, beginning on line 12], entitled
"Compensation", which mentions "per diem and travel expenses".
She asked if that would be paid for through user fees and
grants.
MS. Holland replied yes.
4:08:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL referred to testimony during the 4/11/17
House State Affairs Standing Committee meeting citing a study,
which stated that most of the economic impact of climate change
is projected to be in the Interior due to the large amount of
infrastructure in that region. He pointed out that the
Interior is not on the list of regions in Version R from which
members of the commission would be appointed.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON offered that to correct that omission,
there is a forthcoming amendment to add a seat representing the
Interior.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL mentioned that with the selection [of
commissioners] based on region, it would be unfortunate for a
regional "battle" to ensue. He stated that climate change
affects many places in Alaska; therefore, there may be conflict
over funding or what region is in greatest need. He asked if
the sponsor was concerned about this. He asked if the overall
mission of the proposed legislation is to bring awareness to
climate change or to mitigate it or something else.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON answered that he is not worried about
regional tensions; they would be avoided because Version R is
drafted such that the various regions would all be represented
on the commission. He offered that like for the CZMA, the
members of the commission would be those on the "frontlines" and
in the best positions to know the impacts to their regions. He
referred to the proposed Section 44.19.660 [on page 4 of Version
R, beginning on line 13], entitled "Powers of the commission",
and noted that the powers of the commission would be broad; the
commission would be a clearinghouse for information, study,
grant seeking, coordination with other agencies, public
outreach, and monitoring and reporting. He mentioned that the
duties are also listed under the proposed Section 44.19.662 [on
page 5 of Version R, beginning on line 2], entitled "Duties of
the commission". He pointed out that the original version of HB
173 was more ambitious; it included a surcharge using the
[Division of] Spill Prevention and Response (SPAR) [Department
of Environmental Conservation (DEC)] fund. Version R is less
ambitious in that there are fewer resources to accomplish what
is proposed, but it is a starting point to begin the process.
He relayed that two governors ago there was a belief that this
was a concern; he maintained that the impact of climate change
has only grown; and it is important to recommence these efforts.
4:12:33 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS asked if under Version R, a designee would
be permitted to attend a commission meeting in the place of a
commissioner.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON responded that there is mention of
alternate members and deputy commissioners. He expressed his
confidence that with the large number of members on the
commission, the absence of a single commissioner would not
undermine the commission's work. He referred the committee to
the proposed Section 44.19.656 [on page 3 of Version R,
beginning on line 21], entitled "Alternate members".
4:14:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked if there are other commissions or
committees working on these issues. He mentioned the [10th]
Arctic Council Ministerial Meeting [5/1/17] and offered that
there is a great deal of activity on the topic of climate
change. He asked if there is redundancy.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON offered his understanding that although
the lieutenant governor has a keen interest in climate change
and is examining it as matter of policy for the [Governor Bill]
Walker/[Lieutenant Governor Byron] Mallot administration, there
is not a specific state effort. He offered that the topic of
climate change comes up often in many legislative hearings, but
as a state effort with a commission, it has been suspended since
the Palin subcabinet was disbanded. He conceded that there is a
great deal of research on climate change in Alaska, and it is a
significant topic of research and concern for the University of
Alaska Fairbanks (UAF); however, he offered that he is not aware
of a centralized effort on this issue emanating from state
government.
4:15:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON referred to page 2, lines 6-7, of Version
R - the proposed subparagraph (E) - which read, "Upper Cook
Inlet area, including the Municipality of Anchorage and the
Matanuska-Susitna Borough", and noted that the area mentioned
encompasses a large population of the state, and only one
representative [for that area] is proposed for the commission.
She opined that it would be disproportionately underrepresented.
She asked about the goal of the composition of the commission,
if not by population or equal representation.
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON referred to the proposed Section
44.19.660 [on page 4 of Version R, beginning on line 13], which
describes the powers of the commission, and the proposed Section
44.9.662 [on page 5 of Version R, beginning on line 2], which
describes the duties of the commission. He noted that the
duties of the commission would be broad and encompassing. He
indicated that the intent for composition of the commission is
not for a "one man, one vote" membership, like in the
legislature, but more for the geographic representation; it
would be the commissioners with the greatest stake and exposure
to climate change.
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX moved to bring the CS for HB 173, Version
R, before the committee for discussion. There being no
objection, the motion passed.
4:18:23 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:18 p.m. to 4:20 p.m.
4:19:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX moved to rescind the committee action to
bring the CS for HB 173, Version R, before the committee for
discussion. There being no objection, the action was rescinded.
[The motion to bring Version R before the committee was treated
as withdrawn].
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX moved to adopt the CS for HB 173, Version
R, as the working document. There being no objection, Version R
was adopted as a work draft.
4:20:42 PM
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS opened public testimony on HB 173.
4:20:58 PM
DANIELLE REDMOND testified that this year the state is faced
with a massive budget deficit that has strained the legislature.
She opined that in all these budget conversations, it is
important to look ahead and to point out that Alaska is on the
frontlines of climate change impacts, which will result in
enormous costs for the state. She relayed that having a body to
study these questions and support communities like Shishmaref,
whose existence is at stake, seems like the very least Alaska
should do.
4:22:24 PM
BUCK LINDEKUGEL, Conservation Attorney, Southeast Alaska
Conservation Council (SEACC), testified that SEACC welcomes
action by Representatives Josephson and Geran Tarr on climate
change, because Alaska cannot ignore the long-term implications
of climate change on Alaska's economy and unique way of life.
He expressed his appreciation that the proposed legislation
focuses on climate impacts to rural Alaska, because it would
provide important support to local communities and non-profits,
who are on the frontlines of this issue. He stated that Alaska
needs to act now; the President of the United States has made
climate denial a staple of his success and has appointed a
climate denier to run the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
He said, "It's time to get to work here in Alaska on positive
local job-creating solutions to climate change."
4:24:12 PM
BOB SHAVELSON, Advocacy Director, Cook Inletkeeper, testified
that Cook Inletkeeper is a non-profit started in 1995 focusing
on clean water and healthy salmon. He maintained that "the
debate is over"; it is well known that burning fossil fuels
causes climate change and ocean acidification; and Alaska is on
the frontlines of rapid climate change. He mentioned the
receding glaciers, disappearing sea ice, and melting permafrost.
He stated that in Kachemak Bay, there have been a variety of
significant impacts directly linked to a warming climate:
forest devastation by a massive aphid; extensive seabird die-
off; hardshell clam die-off; decrease in razor clam population
on the east side of Cook Inlet; and never-before-seen instances
of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP). He maintained that the
most disturbing impact is the temperatures of the salmon
streams, which violates the clean water standards, causes stress
in salmons, and makes them more vulnerable to pollution,
predation, and disease. He said that climate change threatens
the Alaskan lifestyle, and fisheries are at grave risk. He
expressed his support for HB 173 and is disappointed that the
funding mechanism was removed. He maintained that without
adequate funding, HB 173 would be a "tiny baby step," and giant
strides are needed to address the severity of the problem.
4:26:38 PM
ELIZABETH RODERICK testified that she appreciates that the
legislature is considering acting on climate change; the state
is not addressing the issue; action is overdue; and HB 173 will
begin some movement on the issue. She maintained that many
Alaskans are worried; she is losing sleep; and communities are
experiencing economic losses. She stated that tourism and
fisheries are the third and fourth largest sectors of the Alaska
economy and relayed some of the consequences of climate change:
in 2015, warm water temperatures and low river levels killed
salmon in Matanuska and Susitna areas; hundreds of arctic char
stocked by the Department of Fish & Game died; in January 2017,
U.S. Secretary of Commerce [Penny Pritzker] granted Governor
Walker's request for declaration of disaster for Alaska's salmon
fisheries; the harvests in Kodiak, Prince William Sound,
Chignik, and Lower Cook Inlet were much below the forecasts; and
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [U.S.
Department of Commerce (DOC)] determined that increasing acidity
in Alaska waters is dissolving the shells of snails feeding pick
salmon, herring, and mackerel.
MS. RODERICK offered that the Arctic sea ice is considered the
"air conditioner" for the world because of the role it plays in
regulating global temperatures, and it is disappearing at an
alarming rate. She reiterated that infrastructure is being
badly impacted and will cost a great deal if not addressed now.
She stated that Alaska has lost an estimated 300,000 caribou in
northern Alaska from drowning and starvation due to the warmer
temperatures. She maintained that the state's military leaders
are declaring [climate change] to be the biggest threat to
economic and national security. She expressed her
disappointment with the elimination of the surcharge in Version
R and asserted that Alaska needs to move forward with a climate
change adaptation plan.
4:29:46 PM
KAREN CAMERON, P.E.P.P.A., testified that the Arctic is where
the greatest changes are taking place. She lamented that Alaska
is not the leader and model that it could be for the rest of the
world. She maintained that a commission, such as proposed under
HB 173, would allow a variety of communications between
scientists, citizens, and governmental officials; Alaska could
have one vision as to what needs to be done and how to go about
it.
MS. CAMERON asserted that there are incredible sources of
funding that Alaska is missing out on - the National Science
Foundation (NSF), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and NOAA. Many non-
profits could apply for this money, and the money could be
funneled through the State of Alaska. She emphasized the
importance of the commission members and encouraged the
appointment of Adjutant General Laurie Hummel, Commissioner of
the Department of Military & Veterans' Affairs (DMVA). She
stated that there were many issues to consider and expressed her
appreciation for the people focused on climate change.
4:32:09 PM
KRISTEN COLLINS, Organizer, Alaska Center, testified that she
supports forming a commission and stated that Alaska's Arctic
communities are already faced with the impact of a warming
climate. She maintained that the proposed legislation
represents a step that the state needs to take forward to be
able to react and recover from climate change impacts. She
offered her support for HB 173 and urged the committee to
prioritize legislation that would enable communities to be
resilient in the years and through the changes to come. She
expressed her disappointment that the funding mechanism was
removed from the proposed legislation; and she offered her
support for HB 173.
4:33:15 PM
ANN RAPPOPORT testified that the proposed legislation would be a
mix of relief and adjustment strategies for addressing climate
change in Alaska. She mentioned her career in fish and wildlife
biology and reiterated that Alaska is ground zero for climate
change. She relayed impacts that she has seen in her 38 years
in Alaska: glaciers melting and the gardening season
lengthening significantly; coastal erosion and river flooding
causing millions and millions of dollars of damage to countless
villages and infrastructure throughout the state; and invasive
species spreading with threats to wild fish, wildlife, and
habitats that support subsistence, commercial, and recreational
uses of tremendous economic, cultural, and other benefits to all
Alaskans.
MS. RAPPORT said, "It's way past time for the state to implement
a thoughtful and coordinated approach to addressing these
changes and threats to our existing economy and ways of life."
She asserted that HB 173 would present a start to this approach.
It would bring state agencies and elected leaders together in a
climate change response commission to come up with solutions for
Alaska. It would include grants, procurements, and technical
and financial assistance to communities advancing renewable
energy technology and advising the governor and legislature on
climate policy. She maintained that all of these are very much
needed. She stated that she is very disappointed in the change
in the funding mechanism under Version R. She opined that the
source of funding originally proposed - 1-cent per barrel
surcharge on oil production - is appropriate due to the
relationship between the production of oil and climate change;
it is very reasonable; it would not impact the budget; and it
would provide funding for the essential activities under HB 173.
She mentioned that she is concerned that the user fees and
grants proposed in Version R would not provide sufficient
funding.
CHAIR KREISS-TOMKINS asked for an at-ease to pass the gavel to
Vice Chair LeDoux.
4:35:23 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:35 p.m. to 4:37 p.m.
4:36:42 PM
VICE CHAIR LEDOUX continued public testimony on HB 173.
4:37:01 PM
BJOMA OLSEN, Kachemak Bay Conservation Society (KBCS), testified
that he recently has started an organization called Alaskans
KNOW Climate Change to encourage Alaska to address the climate
change issue. He relayed that the EPA has stated that over the
past 60 years, Alaska has warmed 3 degrees Fahrenheit - more
than twice the global average - and over 6 degrees in the winter
during the same period. Three Iditarod [Trail Sled Dog Races]
had to be moved to a Fairbanks restart. He added that Alaska is
witnessing the effects of climate change, which should put to
rest any ideas of a "liberal conspiracy theory." He fully
supports HB 173 and is also dismayed that the surcharge has been
removed from the proposed legislation. He suggested that Alaska
should join the European nations that have been taking large
strides in addressing climate change adaptation and mitigation.
4:38:59 PM
MIKE SALLEE testified that he agrees with the other testifiers.
He offered that a climate commission could possibly build upon
already existing projects, such as: the one in which Thorne bay
students created a working model of a water pump that works off
the tides 24 hours per day; and studies of the food chain
involving salmon and sable fish, specifically related to the
dissolving shell of the tetrapod due to ocean acidification. He
said he is very disappointed that the surcharge on oil was
eliminated from the proposed legislation. He maintained that it
is well documented that the oil industry has undermined the
science connecting climate change to human activity. He
asserted that he is apprehensive of the power of oil interests
in influencing the Alaska legislature.
4:41:32 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 4:41 p.m.
4:41:56 PM
VICE CHAIR LEDOUX continued public testimony on HB 173 after
technical difficulties were resolved.
4:42:40 PM
CEAL SMITH, Alaska Climate Caucus; Alaska Climate Action
Network, referred to a letter of support [dated 5/3/17] included
in the committee packet and signed by over 170 people
representing over 30 organizations in Alaska. She asserted that
the issue of climate change is urgent and important; climate
change is impacting Alaska profoundly and at an alarming rate;
it is affecting people's everyday lives. She stated that the
trends are not encouraging: every year since 2014 Alaska has
had record-breaking temperatures; and this fall temperatures
across large parts of the Arctic Ocean were 68 degrees
Fahrenheit above normal. She relayed that the failure to act on
climate change is hurting Alaskans. She said that nearly 15
years ago the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) reported 86
percent of Alaska's Native villages are impacted; Kivalina,
Koyukuk, Newtok and Shishmaref are in imminent danger; and she
expressed her belief that it is past time that Alaska supports
the relocation of these villages. She offered that when polling
the members of her organizations, climate change is ranked one
and two among the list of concerns. She expressed that her
membership is in support of HB 173 and would like to see the
funding mechanism restored.
4:45:31 PM
MOIRA INGLE testified that Alaska is at the forefront of climate
change and Alaskans are seeing the effects of it. She lauded
former Governor [Sarah] Palin's subcabinet and mentioned that
former Governor [Sean] Parnell abandoned the effort. She
emphasized that given the position of Alaska on the forefront of
climate change in the U.S. and the world, state level action on
climate change is long overdue. She expressed her support for
HB 173 - to restart the effort - and her disappointment with the
removal of the funding mechanism. She maintained that the
proposed surcharge was modest and would have been levied on an
appropriate industry - the fossil fuel industry - which has both
benefited from oil extraction and is culpable in climate change.
She referred to the 5/3/17 letter of support mentioned by the
previous testifier and urged the committee to consider the
suggestions in the letter for amendments to HB 173, as follows:
to require the Commission to develop a climate change adaptation
plan within two years; to expand the commission to include
experts and representatives from more Interior census areas; and
to increase the surcharge.
4:48:20 PM
RAYMOND O'NEILL testified that he has worked throughout the
state as an environmental engineer - in Shishmaref, in Yukon-
Kuskokwim Delta communities, and in Yukon Flats communities -
and has seen the impact of global warming. He asserted that it
is a climate crisis that is approaching an emergency. Across
North America including Alaska, vector borne diseases are on the
rise. The village of Shishmaref is eroding away; infrastructure
is not being supported; and new infrastructure is not being
brought in because of the need for the community to move. He
maintained that attention to climate change is long overdue; it
is hurting Alaska now; the community public health, safety,
economy, and environment have been impacted in many ways. He
recommended that the committee adopt the amendments suggested in
the 5/3/17 letter of support. He said he is outraged that the
surcharge on fossil fuel would be questioned; the people of the
communities most impacted are unable to fund the effort; and the
industries that have profited from [the extraction of fossil
fuels] need to assist.
4:51:02 PM
MICHELLE O'NEIL PURYEAR testified that she agrees with the
proposed legislation; it is the social responsibility of any
corporation doing resource extraction to reinvest in the
communities they affect; and she considers it the cost of doing
business.
4:52:14 PM
CARL WASSILLIE, Biologist, Alaska's Big Village Network (ABVN),
testified that he is a Yup'ik biologist from the Kuskokwim
[River] area. He stated that he is concerned about climate
change; climate change resolutions have been issued from the
Yukon-Kuskokwim region beginning in 2005; since 2003, multiple
tribes of the region have requested that [actions] be taken
domestically and internationally to adjust to the changes that
are causing harm to communities. He maintained that the State
of Alaska has responsibility to the citizens of Alaska and for
preventing implications of human rights abuses associated with
doing nothing about climate change. He stated that he supports
HB 173 fully and is disappointed that the funding has been
eliminated. (indisc.) He asserted that HB 173 would be a good
step and expressed his appreciation for the state reevaluating
what the Palin administration did in 2006. He said the impacts
[of climate change] are not only physical but are psychological;
the harm is ongoing, especially in coastal villages and river
villages dealing with the loss of sea ice and increased flooding
and erosion.
4:54:51 PM
ERIC SHAETZLE testified that Alaska must anticipate and prepare
for the effects of climate change. He offered that even if the
assessment of the numerous impacts was restricted solely to the
fishing industry, those efforts would be justified. He
maintained that ocean acidification and hydrologic cycle
disruptions are direct threats to Alaska's economy. Alaska
needs to protect the economic interest of Alaskans and identify
opportunities for Alaska that might emerge because of the
growing response to this global challenge.
4:55:53 PM
VICE CHAIR LEDOUX closed public testimony on HB 173.
4:56:06 PM
The committee took a brief at-ease at 4:56 p.m.
4:56:28 PM
VICE CHAIR LEDOUX announced that HB 173 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 184 4.4.17.PDF |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Sponsor Statement 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Sectional Analysis 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter Planned Parenthood 4.27.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter HRC 4.28.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter LWVA 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter SAGE 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter ATFE 5.1.2017.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter Fbx PFLAG 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter AAARP 5.4.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Letter EGJ 5.4.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Public Letters 5.8.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Court Decisions 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - 2017 Survey(2) 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - 2017 Survery(1) 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB184 Supporting Document - 2010 Census 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Anch LGBT Discrimination Preliminary Report 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - ASHRC Resolution 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Legal Memo 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - HRC State Laws 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Williams Institute 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Ministerial Exemption 5.9.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - 18.80.300 5.9.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Supporting Document - Memorandum, Religious Exemptions 5.9.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 184 Opposing Document - Letter AFC 5.5.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM HSTA 3/6/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |
| HB 173 Sponsor Statement 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 ver U 5.3.17.PDF |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Additional Document - Article ADN 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Additional Document - Overview EPA 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Additional Document - Paper PNAS 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Additional Document - Report CPI 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Additional Document - Chapter NCA 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 HSTA CS ver R 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 173 Summary of Changes ver U to CS HSTA ver R 5.3.17.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 5/9/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 173 |
| HB 184 Sponsor Statement 1.19.18.pdf |
HSTA 5/4/2017 3:00:00 PM HSTA 2/27/2018 3:15:00 PM |
HB 184 |