Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
02/21/2012 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB192 | |
| Analysis of Royalty Modification (focus on Economic Analysis) Presentation by Department of Natural Resources | |
| SB176 | |
| HB144 | |
| HB185 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 192 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 144 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 185 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | SB 176 | ||
HB 144-REPORT ON FISHING STREAM ACCESS
4:57:27 PM
CO-CHAIR WAGONER announced HB 144 to be up for consideration
[CSHB 144(RES), 27-LS0220\I, was before the committee].
CO-CHAIR PASKVAN moved to bring HB 144 before this committee for
purposes of discussion.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER objected for discussion purposes.
4:58:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE LES GARA, sponsor of HB 144, testified that
people have lost their public access to fishing streams
throughout the country. For instance, people can no longer
access 180 miles of the Missouri River and in Wyoming and
Montana, ranchers and movie stars are famous for being able to
close off fishing streams' access to people. Alaskans are lucky,
but we're slowly losing fishing stream access, especially along
the road system where roughly half of the Salcha River in
Fairbanks is thus endangered, along with over one mile of
Montana Creek and Willow Creek in the Valley and over one mile
of the Anchor River on the Kenai Peninsula.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA said when the state owns the land there is
access in the smaller rivers where one can wade up to the high
water mark, but other big rivers are mostly in wilderness status
(nobody has wanted to develop them) and privately owned by
Native corporations and other private property owners. And one
day they will be developed, which is fine. That is the private
property owners' right. But HB 144 asks the Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) and the Alaska Department of Fish and
Game (ADF&G) to say what they have done to maintain and protect
public access in the prior year and what their plans are for the
next year. The goal is to remind them that they have a duty to
promote and maintain public access, and if we are going to start
to lose it, it's much cheaper for the state to try and negotiate
a voluntary easement purchase before the land is developed
rather than after. That is the problem in Missouri, Wyoming and
Montana. Once the land has been developed, you can only buy tiny
parcels back. In Alaska, before the landowners decide they are
going to do something with the land, it would be smart for the
state to at least approach the landowner, and the legislature
could appropriate whatever funds it thought appropriate, about
the public access. If they say yes, easements are wanted to the
river and along it and in places where the rivers are too deep
to wade. He said this is a simple bill and it maintains the
state's heritage of sport and other sorts of fishing and helps
in subsistence fishing, too.
5:02:06 PM
With time being too short for a lot of testimony, he listed
letters of support from the Alaska Fly Fishers, the Outdoor
Council, the Kenai River Sportfishing Association, and a number
of other individuals.
SENATOR STEDMAN said this request is for an annual report and
that seemed like a lot of work and asked if it could done every
four or five years.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA replied that the department already knows
where public access is being lost and the report won't change
much from year to year unless new access has been successfully
accumulated. It takes a long time to negotiate a piece of
easement and having an annual requirement will force them to
think it through every year.
5:04:18 PM
ED FOGELS, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources
(DNR), said the conservation of public access is a very
important part of DNR's obligation and they take it very
seriously. Whenever they sell land, they make sure to conserve
access to public waters, whether they are streams or lakes; also
when they convey land out of state ownership, to municipalities,
for instance, they retain easements for public access to public
water bodies. This bill wouldn't significantly affect their
workflow or workload and it would give the legislature an
accounting of what they had accomplished over the year and what
they hope to accomplish for the following year.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER closed the public hearing.
CO-CHAIR PASKVAN moved to bring CSHB 144(RES), version I, before
the committee. There were no objections; Co-Chair Wagoner
removed his objection.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report CSHB 144(RES) from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s). There were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Nikaitchuq_Final_Finding_2008.pdf |
SRES 2/21/2012 3:30:00 PM |
SB 192 |
| Nikaitchuq_Final_Finding_2006.pdf |
SRES 2/21/2012 3:30:00 PM |
SB 192 |
| SRES_DNR-DOG_Royalty_Mod_slides_2_21_12.pdf |
SRES 2/21/2012 3:30:00 PM |
SB 192 |