Legislature(2015 - 2016)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/23/2015 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB115 | |
| HB140 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 115 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 140 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 140
"An Act authorizing the Alaska Railroad Corporation to
issue revenue bonds to finance a positive train
control rail transportation safety project that
qualifies for federal financial participation; and
providing for an effective date."
2:15:43 PM
JANE PIERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON,
communicated that the bill would authorize the Alaska
Railroad Corporation to issue up to $37 million in tax
exempt bonds backed by the federal transit administration
formula funds received annually by the corporation. She
detailed that bond proceeds would be used to finance
positive train control, a safety program mandated by
federal government without any correlating funding.
Co-Chair Neuman noted that the railroad needed
approximately $55 million to complete the program. He
referred to the bonding authority of $34.1 million provided
under the bill, which left $18 million. He asked if it was
the intent of the Alaska Railroad Corporation to ask the
legislature for the additional funds.
WILLIAM O'LEARY, PRESIDENT AND CEO, ALASKA RAILROAD
CORPORATION (via teleconference), replied that the railroad
had yet to determine where it would obtain the remaining
$18 million; $55 million would be addressed through the
legislation. He elaborated that $37 million would get the
railroad through approximately two years of activity on the
project, which would provide the railroad time to look at
options.
Co-Chair Neuman asked if the corporation had discussed the
$18 million with its board and the possibility the
legislature may need to provide additional funding in the
future. Mr. O'Leary in the affirmative. He detailed that
originally the plan had been to request the full $55
million over a three-year period from the legislature. The
corporation's had the ability to refinance existing debt,
which created headroom to bond for the $37 million. He
addressed the remaining $18 million and agreed that
everyone was considering where the funds would come from.
He stated that the corporation did not currently know where
the additional funds could come from.
2:19:44 PM
Co-Chair Neuman was concerned that the state did not have
capital funds to put towards the project. He wondered what
would happen in three years' time. He wondered what other
options the corporation had besides requesting the funds
from the legislature.
Mr. O'Leary replied that he did not know. He reasoned that
the issue would be dealt with as the project went forward.
He communicated that the corporation's primary objective
was to keep the project moving forward and to continue to
make a good faith effort as required by its regulators. He
believed that the legislation would hopefully provide time
to come up with a solution for the remainder of funds
needed to complete the project by 2018.
Co-Chair Neuman commented that he did not mind moving the
bill forward, but he wanted assurance from the railroad
that it did not intend to come forward with further capital
fund requests in the future.
Representative Gattis wanted assurance that the corporation
did not intend to come back to the state for funds. She
spoke to decisions businesses were required to make related
to financing; there were choices to sell assets, to re-
bond, or other.
Mr. O'Leary answered that he was not trying to be coy in
his response. The corporation did not know where the funds
would come from. He agreed that the corporation's major
focus was continuing to move forward with the unfunded
mandate. He mentioned options of state, federal, and
railroad funds. He underscored that the railroad understood
that it had to obtain the funds somewhere and that it was
necessary to keep moving forward on the project.
Representative Gattis asked if the corporation had the
assets it could utilize if push came to shove. Mr. O'Leary
answered that the railroad did not have the money or assets
currently. He noted that if it did have the money it would
most likely be moving forward with those funds. The goal
was to begin to determine what the corporation would need
to do to obtain the $18 million.
2:24:11 PM
Co-Chair Thompson believed the railroad had significant
assets that it may need to consider utilizing. He hoped the
committee had adequately conveyed that the state would
probably not have any money for three or four years.
Co-Chair Thompson CLOSED public testimony.
Co-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT HB 140 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HB 140 was REPORTED out of committee with a "no
recommendation" recommendation and with one new zero fiscal
note from the Department of Commerce, Community and
Economic Development.
Co-Chair Thompson discussed the schedule for the following
day.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 115 CS WorkDraft FIN I version.pdf |
HFIN 3/23/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Opposition.pdf |
HFIN 3/23/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 140 Response Deven Mitchell.pdf |
HFIN 3/23/2015 1:30:00 PM STRA 4/7/2015 1:00:00 PM |
HB 140 |
| HB 115 NEW FN DNR.pdf |
HFIN 3/23/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Response Ed Fogels.pdf |
HFIN 3/23/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 115 |
| HB 115 Federalist Society Legal Overview Utah Act.pdf |
HFIN 3/23/2015 1:30:00 PM |
HB 115 |