Legislature(2015 - 2016)HOUSE FINANCE 519
03/31/2015 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB68 | |
| HB143 | |
| HB135 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 143 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 135 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 68 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 135
"An Act establishing a Roth contribution program for
the public employees' deferred compensation program;
and providing for an effective date."
3:29:50 PM
ANDY MILLS, LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, DEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION, explained that the Deputy Commissioner
could not be present for the current meeting. He reviewed
HB 135. He related that the bill was a way for employees to
control the timing of taxation of their deferred
contributions. Currently the deferred compensation plan was
a pre-tax option. Taxes would be paid at the time of
retirement. The bill allowed for another deferred
compensation option that was a post-tax plan. Taxes would
not be paid in the future. Employees could then have a mix
of pre-tax and post-tax options in their retirement
portfolios. He furthered that current Alaska statutes only
allowed for tax deferred contributions into the plan and
was passed in 1973. In 2011, Congress passed legislation
that enabled state governments to provide the Roth 457
option. He deduced that the Roth 457 was another option for
public employees to diversify their retirement portfolio
and merely offered another deferred compensation option.
Co-Chair Thompson asked whether the post-tax contribution
earnings were taxable.
KATHY LEA, CHIEF PENSION OFFICER, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT
AND BENEFITS, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, explained that
the objective of a designated ROTH contribution was that
the earnings were not taxed upon distribution if they met
the qualification rules. The qualification rules required
that the Roth account was intact for five tax years, and
the member's age was 59 and a half.
Representative Guttenberg asked what the benefit for the
employee was by opening the Roth through the state. Ms. Lea
explained that the designated Roth contribution differed
from the private sector Roth IRA because it took on the
characteristics of a deferred compensation plan. Therefore,
the total contribution was greater than what was allowed in
the private sector Roth accounts. In addition. there was
not an income requirement to participate in the plan.
Representative Guttenberg asked what the maximum
contribution was. Ms. Lea responded that the maximum
contribution for deferred compensation was $18 thousand per
year. She continued that the employee could elect a pre or
post tax plan or contribute to both options. The state was
required to account for both options differently.
3:35:05 PM
Representative Guttenberg asked whether there was an
expected rate of return. Ms. Lea stated that Roth 457 was
not an investment option it was a taxation option. She
indicated that the investment vehicles in the deferred
compensation plan remained the same and the rate of return
depended upon the investment plans the employee chose.
Co-Chair Thompson asked whether the $18 thousand limit on
deferred compensation contributions applied to both pre and
post tax options. Ms. Lea answered that the limit applied
to both options and was the total limit if the employee
chose a combination.
Co-Chair Neuman wondered why the deferred compensation plan
was not set up with both options when the plan was
implemented. Ms. Lea explained that the Roth option only
became available on January 1, 2011.
Representative Pruitt expressed concerns with the state
taking on the additional role of financial advisor. He
wondered how the state could convey the information to the
employees in a way that they could relay the proper
information to their personal financial advisor or
correctly manage their retirement accounts on their own.
Ms. Lea reported that a contribution to the state ROTH 457
would not prohibit an employee from also contributing to a
private sector Roth IRA. The plan also provided some
optional financial education and advice to employees.
Representative Pruitt misunderstood the plan and thought
that $18 thousand limit was the full contribution an
employee could make in both the state and private plans.
3:40:08 PM
Mr. Mills commented that retirement investments were highly
personalized and noted the probable benefits of a post-tax
option. He thought that the additional plan "empowered
employees with options."
Vice-Chair Saddler stated that the Roth 457 was simply a
different vehicle to manage deferred compensation.
3:41:19 PM
HB 135 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further
consideration.