Legislature(2007 - 2008)
05/09/2007 02:45 PM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB90 | |
| SB95 | |
| HB118 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CSHB 118(RLS)-PROHIBIT ALLOWING MINORS TO HAVE ALCOHOL
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of CSHB 118(RLS).
3:42:38 PM
MIKE PAWLOWSKI, staff to Representative Kevin Meyer, sponsor of
HB 118, said this bill would give police a tool to combat
minors' possession of alcohol in a dwelling.
3:44:30 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE said it sounds like the sponsor believes that
parents can't be charged for having alcohol in the home with
minors.
MR. PAWLOWSKI explained that the word "physically" was added to
line 5, on page 1. The sponsor's intent is that a parent in
absentia isn't responsible. The responsible person is the one
who is physically in the dwelling and exercising dominion and
control.
SENATOR MCGUIRE said she doesn't disagree with the policy, but
in the past couple of years the government has been reaching
farther and farther into the house. Alaska is becoming a "nanny
state". She asked if it's reckless if someone is in a friend's
house and a bottle of wine is in the wine cabinet that is not
locked.
3:47:14 PM
MR. PAWLOWSKI responded that issue had been talked about a lot
as the bill has worked its way through the process. A reason
they chose "recklessly" and not "criminal negligence" is because
it addresses aware of and conscious disregard of the risk. The
definition of "recklessly" in AS 04.21.080(3) says the risk must
be of such a nature and degree that disregard of it constitutes
a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a reasonable
person would observe in the situation. It affects the person who
is in possession of the dwelling at the time.
3:48:23 PM
CHAIR FRENCH said most of the time the incident would be
committed by a teenager whose parents are out of town. Chances
are he would be cited for Minor in Possession. Adults who host
are a bit more culpable. He asked why such an incident wouldn't
be considered contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
3:50:07 PM
MR. PAWLOWSKI replied it should be. He added that DPS is often
more concerned with insuring that people don't drive and with
keeping kids from running away. The gathering of evidence and
prosecution is very difficult. The bill sponsor firmly believes
that the over-21 people who are throwing parties for underage
people will be seriously affected by several $500 fines in a
row. This is a tool for the police to very easily say, "You have
this violation and when we can prove it, we're going to get you
for furnishing as well. And that's the kind of conjunction we
hope works out." They often can't prove the adults were
furnishing alcohol.
SENATOR THERRIAULT posed a hypothetical situation where a bunch
of neighbors came for dinner and their 19-year old college
student is invited to have a glass of wine with everybody else
at the table. He asked if that would run afoul of this law and
how that situation would be differentiated that from a raucous
party.
MR. PAWLOWSKI replied the important part of that example is that
the minor's parents are accompanying him and it's not in a
licensed premises. That exemption is in AS 04.16.051 which says
"This section does not prohibit the furnishing or deliver of an
alcoholic beverage by a parent to the parent's child." The
sponsor didn't want to make the policy call of parental
permission.
SENATOR MCGUIRE remarked the bill is an example of the
government trying to control families and it will have many
unintended consequences. She said she's aware of the mental
intent of recklessness, but is unsure about the definition of
disregarding known risk.
3:54:51 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced he would hold HB 118 for further work.
There being no further business to come before the committee, he
adjourned the meeting at 3:55:05 PM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|