Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/29/2000 03:15 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 114-REPEAL PROHIBITION ANTLERLESS MOOSE
CHAIRMAN HALFORD announced HB 114 to be up for consideration.
MR. ED GRASSER, Aide to Representative Beverly Masek, explained
that this is kind of an inflammatory issue. Most of the advisory
committees in the State "chewed them out" because it took all their
power away. Representative Masek decided that an outright repeal
of AS 16.05.780 wasn't the right way to go. They discussed the
issue with several advisory committees and the Department and
decided to change the way the current law works. The new language
would create a situation where the advisory committees would have
to act in the positive to prevent the Board from reauthorizing a
cow moose hunt which involves a lot of time and expense. Usually,
the Board just rubber stamps what the advisory committee sends
them. Right now the Department has to go out with the area
biologists and round up all the advisory committees in an area
where an anterless moose hunt is taking place, get permission to
continue it, and bring that information to the Board to act on the
reauthorization.
Advisory committees made it real clear that they didn't want to
give up that power.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved to adopt the committee substitute. There were
no objections and it was so ordered.
SENATOR MACKIE said there was a letter from Commissioner Rue,
ADF&G, supporting the original HB 114 and asked if he supported the
CS.
MR. GRASSER answered that he thought that was the case, though,
they would have to check with the Department. They were trying to
reduce the costs involved with this reauthorization every year. He
thought it would be good to include language that makes it clear
that the reauthorizations only takes place in the area for which
the Board is meeting.
MR. MATT ROBUS, Deputy Director, Division of Wildlife Conservation,
supported the outright repeal of the prohibition in the original
version. However, the Department introduced language similar to
what's in the CS a couple of years ago and agree that it is an
appropriate way to go. One conceptual change he would like to see
that would further reduce the costs involved in the reauthorization
process would be to word this so that it took on the same two year
region by region cycle the Board of Game meetings now do.
Presently, every spring they have a meeting of the Board of Game in
either Anchorage and Fairbanks. Staff and advisory committees from
throughout the State that have antlerless moose hunts in their area
have to go through the motions of reviewing the status of the herd
and decide whether they want to go forth with this hunt for another
year. This means they bring staff from regions around the State to
the meetings and those costs could be done away with if they
adopted the same cycle.
MR. DICK BISHOP, Alaska Outdoor Council, supported HB 114. The
statute from 25 years ago has fallen into disuse and become a
burden.
SENATOR TAYLOR asked about a clause saying if no one sends them
anything, you can do what you want. But if a majority of the local
advisory board objects, then you may not adopt.
MR. GRASSER explained that this is how it's been happening for the
last 30 years except for one or two occasions when the Department
had to go out to places and have the advisory committee hold a
meeting. A lot of times they forget or just don't get around to
it. The way the current statute reads, if they don't have a
meeting, they can't have a cow moose hunt.
CHAIRMAN HALFORD said they would hold this bill pending
enlightenment from the sponsor.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|