Legislature(1993 - 1994)
02/24/1993 09:05 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 94(FIN)
An Act making a supplemental appropriation for
costs of elections operations; and providing for
an effective date.
CHARLOT THICKSTUN, Director, Division of Elections, came
before committee. She explained that the supplemental bill
began as a request for $891.5 (SB 74) to cover costs of
election operations for FY 93. In House Finance the bill
was amended to cover costs only until April 30, 1993. It
now totals $312.3.
Shortfalls within the division resulted from unbudgeted
reapportionment costs, higher election costs resulting from
litigation surrounding both reapportionment and the closed
primary, and changes in deadlines. The division originally
proposed that supplemental funding for reapportionment be
included as an agenda item for the special session called by
Governor Hickel last June. That request for $1.6 million
was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for
review. OMB was able to justify $961.1.
When budgeting needs were not addressed during the special
session, the division relied upon the Dept. of Law to
ascertain whether operating funds could be expended on
unbudgeted reapportionment-related functions. The division
was advised that allocations are not budgeted by election
function. Rather, they represent a total allocation for all
election-related activities within the division. The
division was also informed that it was mandated to go
forward in order to facilitate the 1992 national and state
elections.
In a normal year, the division begins preparations for fall
primary and general elections in March. In 1992, that
preparation could not be started because of lack of
finalization of reapportionment. The time-frame for
appointing election workers and preparing election materials
was compressed from six to two months. It took a great
amount of staff and overtime to accomplish what was
necessary in that restricted time period.
There was never any doubt the division would run out of
money. The question was whether it could last until the
legislature convened.
The division has undertaken efforts to cut operating costs,
including elimination of three full-time positions and all
temporary employees. With the exception of supervisory
staff, permanent employees have been reduced to 30 hours a
week.
While HB 94 was under consideration in House Finance,
$27,648 for ten, range 8 temporaries was approved to finish
data input of 30,000 voters onto registration rolls prior to
Anchorage and Mat-Su municipal elections April 20.
Mrs. Thickstun voiced her understanding that an election is
deemed successful if no lawsuits ensue. Based on that
criteria, the division did an exceptional job in both the
1990 and 1992 elections. Voter turnout for the most recent
general election set a record for Alaska and was eighth
highest in the nation.
Senator Kelly voiced support for the $312.0 supplemental,
acknowledging that, in light of reapportionment, the
division did a "marvelous job."
In response to a question from Co-chairman Frank, Mrs.
Thickstun said that the $891.0 request was intended to cover
operating expenses to the end of June. It also included
reimbursement of costs incurred to the Dept. of
Administration, division of information services,
contingency moneys loaned by the Governor, and a $125.0
legal contract for defense of Mrs. Thickstun's
certification of the recall petitions.
Co-chairman Frank noted the $356.2 for personal services,
and $310.0 for Dept. of Administration computer charges.
Mrs. Thickstun explained that $242.0 was budgeted for
computer time. As a result of reapportionment and other
election expenses, costs were higher. She further advised
that reapportionment was never budgeted for. It was
necessary to hire additional staff to input voter
information. Extensive overtime was also incurred since two
shifts were operating. After the initial reapportionment
plan was struck down by the courts and an interim plan was
effected, "everything had to be redone."
The division expected that in the worst case, funding needs
might total $1.6. OMB said it could only justify $961.0,
which was more than our original $891.0 request. Co-
chairman Frank voiced his understanding that the legislature
budgeted $1.6 million for the primary and general election.
Mrs. Thickstun concurred, advising that it represented
cyclical funding provided the division in an election year.
Senator Sharp voiced his understanding that the $312.0 would
carry the division through April, but that an additional
$183.0 would be needed for May and June. Mrs. Thickstun
concurred.
Co-chairman Frank announced that CSHB 94 (Finance) would be
HELD in committee for further review and again considered at
9:00 a.m. the next day.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:40 a.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|