Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124
03/14/2017 03:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB111 | |
| HB87 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 111 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 87 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HJR 12 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 32 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 87-CONFLICT OF INTEREST: BD FISHERIES/GAME
4:44:23 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 87, "An Act relating to participation in
matters before the Board of Fisheries and the Board of Game by
the members of the respective boards; and providing for an
effective date." [Before the committee was CSHB 87(FSH),
reported out of the House Special Committee on Fisheries
2/14/17.]
4:45:13 PM
REID HARRIS, Staff, Representative Louise Stutes, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Stutes, prime sponsor
of HB 87, informed the committee that in 1949 the Territorial
Legislature created the Alaska Territorial Fisheries Service,
which upon statehood became the Alaska Department of Fish & Game
(ADF&G). At that time, a nine-member Board of Fisheries and
Game was established. In 1975, ADF&G separated the board into
two boards: Board of Fisheries and Board of Game. Currently
each board consists of seven members who serve a three-year term
and are appointed based on their interest in public affairs,
good judgement, knowledge, and ability. The role of the Board
of Fisheries is to conserve and develop the fisheries resources
in the state, including subsistence, commercial, sport, guided
sport, and personal use fisheries; the role of the Board of Game
is to conserve and develop Alaska's wildlife resources. Mr.
Harris said the boards serve as the state's regulatory authority
over fisheries and wildlife respectively, and for each board the
commissioner of ADF&G participates as an ex-officio member of
board. The Joint Board of Fisheries and Game meets to set
regulations for the advisory committees, which bring proposals
before the boards. Before the committee was CSHB 87, Version R,
which makes two changes to the functions of the boards. The
first change is that the bill allows members with a declared
conflict of interest to deliberate on subjects, but not to vote.
Currently, before a meeting, members declare a conflict either
based on familial or financial interest. The conflicted member
must leave the dais and participate only as a member of the
public; when this happens the expertise of one or more board
members is lost. In addition, board members can be repeatedly
recused from deliberations. The second change made by Version R
is to narrow the scope of who is defined as an immediate family
member, when pertaining only to the Board of Fisheries and the
Board of Game. Currently, AS 39.52 defines an immediate family
member to include grandparents, aunts, and uncles; however, on
page 1, beginning on line 13, the bill narrows the definition as
follows:
In this subsection, "immediate family member" means
(1) the spouse of the member;
(2) a person cohabiting with the member in a
relationship that is like a marriage but is not a
legal marriage; or
(3) a parent, sibling, or child, including a
stepchild and an adopted child, of the member if the
parent, sibling, or child
(A) resides with the member;
(B) is financially dependent on the member;
or
(C) shares a substantial financial interest
with the member.
MR. HARRIS pointed out the difference between AS 39.52 and the
language in the bill is that grandparents, aunts, and uncles are
removed.
4:49:17 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON offered his understanding that the bill seeks
to narrow the conflicts that arise due to family members, but
asked about other conflicts based on economic interests.
MR. HARRIS said the definition of financial interest is
unchanged in statute and read the following:
Financial interest means an interest held by a public
officer or an immediate family member which includes
an involvement or ownership in an interest in a
business, including a property ownership, a
professional or private relationship that is a source
of income, or from which, or as a result of which, a
person has received or expects to receive a financial
benefit.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON asked if limiting the definition to nuclear
family members will mean board members will be eligible to vote
more often.
MR. HARRIS indicated yes, and offered to provide supporting
testimony.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON pointed out proposed AS 39.52.120(g)
prohibits a board member from voting if a conflict from a
financial interest is determined to exist.
MR. HARRIS added that related legislation was previously
introduced in the Nineteenth, Twentieth, and Twenty-Fifth Alaska
State Legislatures.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON questioned whether, after a member has
declared a conflict, the board can find that the member need not
be recused.
MR. HARRIS explained the board has a policy for members to
"over-declare" and then the board chair decides whether to
uphold the conflict.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON asked if the aforementioned "unilateral power
of the chair to make the final decision" applies to both the
Board of Game and the Board of Fisheries.
MR. HARRIS answered that's correct.
REPRESENTATIVE LOUISE STUTES, Alaska State Legislature, speaking
as the sponsor of HB 87, added that qualified potential board
members are reluctant to apply for a seat on either board
because they anticipate many conflicts that would prevent them
from meaningful service to their industry.
4:53:03 PM
GLENN HAIGHT, Executive Director, Board of Fisheries, Board
Support Section, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, in response
to Co-Chair Josephson's question regarding a board member who
may be overly conservative in his/her recusal, said members
usually discuss potential conflicts with the Department of Law
and the board chair in advance of a meeting.
MR. HARRIS concluded his presentation, noting that the bill has
a zero fiscal note and seeks to allow both boards to make more
informed decisions and thereby create stronger resource
management for the state.
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO gave an example of two acquaintances who
are in partnership with their grandsons and who would be
qualified to serve on the Board of Game, and he said this
circumstance is not uncommon in the Interior. He acknowledged
that family businesses are wonderful; however, he suggested that
grandparents should not be removed as immediate family members,
and he noted that board members with a conflict would still be
allowed to participate.
4:55:57 PM
MR. HARRIS said currently if a grandparent is in partnership
with a board member, then the board member would need to recuse
himself/herself; however, HB 87 would allow said member to
deliberate and vote.
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH agreed with the intent of the bill to keep
members with expertise fully engaged in the deliberations of the
board; however, he expressed concern about the new definition of
immediate family, which differs from that of the Alaska
Executive Branch Ethics Act. He referred to the bill on page 2,
beginning on line 2, paragraph (3), subparagraphs (A), (B), and
(C) [text previously provided] and said this is a dramatic
narrowing of the scope of who can be considered an immediate
family member; for example, none of his siblings lives with him,
is financially dependent on him, or shares a substantial
financial interest with him, and thus would not be immediate
family members, which is obviously incorrect.
MR. HARRIS said narrowing the scope allows the boards to retain
more expertise, without granting any one member undue power over
legislation benefitting one member over another. He advised the
sponsor reviewed many definitions of immediate family membership
and noted the definition would specifically pertain to the
aforementioned boards.
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH asked for clarification that in the event
the immediate family member - parent, sibling, or child - didn't
meet the standards of [subparagraphs (A), (B), or (C)], the
member would not declare a conflict.
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH restated the question and gave the
following example: If my brother owned a fishing boat, and I
serve on the Board of Fisheries, I would not declare a conflict
of interest.
5:02:53 PM
ALPHEUS BULLARD, Attorney, Legislative Legal Counsel,
Legislative Legal Services, Legislative Affairs Agency, said
under AS 39.52.120(c), a member of the Board of Fisheries or
Board of Game is prohibited from acting on a matter if they have
not disclosed a conflict. Further, under AS 39.52.220, members
of the board, after a conflict is disclosed, vote as to whether
the member can continue to participate, deliberate, and vote.
The bill would require, after a conflict is determined to exist,
that the member continue deliberating, but not vote.
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH asked if the bill redefines what would
qualify as a conflict.
MR. BULLARD directed attention to the bill on page 1, line 11,
which read: "If a conflict is determined to exist". He advised
that this is passive language that does not provide how a
conflict is determined to exist, and the court would look to AS
39.52.220 for interpretation.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER referred to AS 39.52.120 and surmised
subsections (a) through (f) would be unaffected by the bill.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON suggested members review AS 39.52.120
subsections (a) through (f) and AS 39.52.220.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked for an example of the problem
addressed by the bill.
MR. HARRIS said the problem is that because Alaska is a small
state, and families are nuclear, many members of both the Board
of Fisheries and the Board of Game are "conflicted out" and
cannot participate in the duties of the board due to certain
activities of their family members.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked for an example.
5:07:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES responded that recently at a meeting of
the Board of Fisheries, a member was "conflicted out" due to a
financial interest with her fisherman ex-husband, which led to a
tie vote on the board and prevented "a season from taking
place." In addition, in Sitka, the Board of Fisheries had two
members declare a conflict and could only make a quorum with
four unanimous votes.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked, "By whose judgement was she
conflicted?"
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES answered the existing statute and the
chair.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH cautioned the legislature is embarking on a
tangled ethics road. He restated the circumstances were that
the member declared a conflict and asked for a ruling from the
chair.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES said yes. The member was conflicted out
based on existing statute.
MR. HAIGHT added that, in consultation with DOL, the conflict
was upheld by the chair, who is the ethics officer for the
board.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked for the composition of the board.
MR. HAIGHT explained a few members are commercial fisherman,
others are active in the sport guiding fishery, or personal use,
and/or subsistence. Board members are not placed by geographic
preference or location, but must be good at public affairs, have
good judgement, and be knowledgeable about fishing issues. Mr.
Haight related that at a finfish meeting in upper Cook Inlet,
there were 173 proposals, and no one was recused; however, at a
Southeast finfish meeting in 2015, two members were recused from
55 of 130 proposals, one because his brother trolled and one
because his son was involved in various fisheries. He said the
situations change.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH clarified that there is no allocation on
the Board of Fisheries for specific interests, or any diversity
with respect to the composition of the board, unlike the Board
of Registration for Architects, Engineers and Land Surveyors.
MR. HAIGHT said the board is not filled by user category;
members are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the
legislature.
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON, speaking from his experience, observed
appointments to the board are selected through a competitive
process surrounded by culture and tradition.
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER expressed his belief that the bill would
allow a conflicted member to continue in discussions, but not to
vote.
5:14:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES responded that's correct; a conflicted
member can participate in board discussions, but is unable to
vote. Currently, the member is unable to participate in
discussion, which excludes pertinent knowledge, thus the intent
is to utilize their knowledge "but not give them the advantage
of a vote."
REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER restated his confusion related to how
the change would affect a tie vote.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES further explained fewer members will be
conflicted out of the boards' discussions. In further response
to Representative Rauscher, she said the bill reduces the scope
of what a conflict is, so under the same conditions, a member
may not be conflicted out and will be able to participate and
vote.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH returned attention to the example given and
opined the member who was receiving a check from her ex-husband
was rightly disqualified.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES advised the board in question was
discussing a different fishery with no competing interest. In
response to Co-Chair Josephson, she said the board member was
forthcoming in her disclosure.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked whether the board member's check
qualified as a "substantial" financial interest.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES said she was unsure and suggested it could
be, relative to one's income.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND concluded that the bill allows a
conflicted member to continue deliberation, and thereby perhaps
influence fellow board members by sharing information, even
though he/she could not vote.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES answered that's correct. She asked, "Why
have a board member with all this information and knowledge and
... not be able to utilize it or have them participate in the
discussion and impart that knowledge to others?"
5:20:36 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON opened public testimony on HB 87.
5:20:51 PM
JERRY MCCUNE, President, United Fisherman of Alaska, informed
the committee United Fisherman of Alaska is the largest
commercial fishing group, including members from the Bering Sea
to Southeast, and testified in support of the bill. He spoke to
a situation in which a Board of Fisheries member was conflicted
out because, although he had no commercial fishing permit, his
aunt held a permit. Mr. McCune acknowledged that the financial
part of the ethics code has been tightened; however, if a member
has no financial gain, there should not be a conflict, and if
there is a conflict, the member cannot participate. He said the
bill is a modest change to the status of family members, and for
a seven-man board, allowing a member to speak on a particular
fishery is important. Mr. McCune said this situation has been a
problem in Southeast.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH asked how often a conflict is declared.
MR. MCCUNE said declarations of conflict are more frequent in
the Board of Fisheries than in the Board of Game; he provided
examples of families who are in the fishing industry in small
towns, especially in commercial fishing. In further response to
Representative Birch, he said a conflict could occur at every
meeting of the Board of Fisheries.
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH expressed his understanding the bill
addresses two problems: members with a conflict cannot
participate and share their expertise, and the conflict of
interest rules are too broad related to family members.
5:25:22 PM
MR. MCCUNE said yes. He restated his belief a member must have
a financial or economic interest to gain from a certain
proposal, in order to have a conflict of interest.
5:25:47 PM
JOHN MURRAY said he is a commercial fisherman who has fished in
Sitka since the late '70s. From his experience attending
Southeast Board of Fisheries meetings over the last 20 years,
representing many interests in the industry, he said the bill is
a commonsense way to help the board complete its work.
5:27:00 PM
RICHARD DAVIS, Principal, Seafood Producers Cooperative,
informed the committee he is a 53-year Alaska resident and has
been a commercial fisherman in Juneau for 45 years. He said the
Seafood Producers Cooperative represents 600 commercial
fisherman-owner members and is North America's largest and
longest surviving fishermen's seafood harvesting, processing,
and marketing cooperative; 500 of the cooperative's fisherman-
owners are Alaska residents. For the last 20 years, the
cooperative has advocated for a change to the stringent existing
conflict of interest restrictions of commercial fishermen - and
others with economic ties to fisheries in Alaska - who serve on
the Board of Fisheries. Members of the board with economic,
personal, or familial ties to commercial fisheries are excluded
from deliberations and voting on proposals after a disclosure,
and thus the experience of affected appointees is not utilized.
He acknowledged that the members are appointed by the governor
and confirmed by the legislature without regard to constituency,
career, activities, geography, or diversity; for this reason,
many qualified Alaskans fail to seek appointment to the Board of
Fisheries. Speaking from his experience in Southeast, Mr. Davis
said a conflict of interest due to familial ties is common. He
said members of the Seafood Producers Cooperative support HB 87.
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH inquired as to how close a relationship is
permissible.
MR. DAVIS said he believed about one-half of the finfish
proposals in Southeast required one member to recuse himself due
to the conflict established by his son, brother, and another
relative. In further response to Representative Birch, he said
if the bill is enacted, in the aforementioned circumstance, as
long as the son did not live with the member or share a
financial interest in the fishery, the restriction would be
alleviated.
5:31:00 PM
MATT ALWARD, a commercial fisherman from Homer, testified in
support of HB 87. He said working people with knowledge and
experience in different professions are asked to serve on
boards, which entails a month of their time per year, yet those
with family members involved in a fishery proposal may not
participate. Mr. Alward opined board members are closely vetted
and have high integrity and morals; to change the conflict of
interest standards of immediate family is responsible and
reasonable. He agreed a conflicted member should not vote;
however, board members are experts and should participate in
board deliberations. Mr. Alward said if an individual is
involved in business with a grandparent, under the provisions of
HB 87, then the member would still have a conflict of interest.
He urged for passage of the bill.
5:32:30 PM
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON announced HB 87 was held over with public
testimony open.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB087 Sponsor Statement 2.7.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/9/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Sponsor Statement ver R 3.10.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Supporting Document APHA 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Supporting Document - Letter of Support UFA 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 ver R H FSH CS 3.12.17.PDF |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Support Lynch.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Oppose RHAK.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Support CDFU.pdf |
HFSH 2/14/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Support ATA.pdf |
HFSH 2/9/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Support SEAFA.pdf |
HFSH 2/9/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB087 Support SPC.pdf |
HFSH 2/14/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HB 87 |
| HB111 DOR Fiscal Note Back-Up for CSHB111(RES).pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 111 |
| HB111 Version N 3.10.17.pdf |
HRES 3/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 111 |
| HB 111- CS Ver N Comparison 3.10.17.pdf |
HRES 3/10/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 111 |
| HJR012 Sponsor Statement 2.22.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 ver A 2.22.17.PDF |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Fiscal Note LEG-SESS-02-23-17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Support - Alaska Trollers Association 2.27.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Support - Southeast Alaska Fishermen's Alliance 2.27.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Support - Petersburg Vessel Owners Association 2.27.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Support - Southeast Alaska Seiners Association 2.27.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Support - United Southeast Alaska Gillnetters 2.27.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Supporting Document-Alaska Dispatch News Article 2.22.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Supporting Document-Reps. Young and Defazio 2.22.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Supporting Document-Sen. Murkowski 2.22.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Support - United Fishermen of Alaska.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Supporting Document - Presentation House Resources Committee 3.12.17.pdf |
HFSH 2/28/2017 10:00:00 AM HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Version D (FSH) 3.12.17.PDF |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Supporting Document - Letter of Support from SalmonState.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HJR012 Supporting Document - Letter of Support Nelson 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HB032 Supporting Document - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB032 version A 3.12.17.PDF |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB032 Fiscal Note - DEC 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - GMO Q & A 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB032 Supporting Document - Letter of Support UFA 3.13.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - NY Times Article 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - HB 92 - AK Trollers Association Letter of Support.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - HB 92 Consolidated Letters of Support 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - Info Graphic 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - Letter of Support for HB 92 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - News Article #2 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - News Article #3 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - News Article #4 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB32 Supporting Document - News Article #5 3.12.17.pdf |
HRES 3/13/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HB 32 |
| HB111 Opposing Document - AOGA Reaction to CS 03.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 111 |
| HJR012 Supporting Document - Letter of Support from Trojan 3.14.17_Redacted.pdf |
HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM HRES 3/15/2017 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/20/2017 7:00:00 PM HRES 3/22/2017 6:00:00 PM |
HJR 12 |
| HB111 Fiscal Note DNR-DOG 3.14.17.pdf |
HRES 3/14/2017 3:00:00 PM |
HB 111 |