Legislature(2013 - 2014)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/29/2013 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB81 | |
| HB83 | |
| SB36 | |
| HB69 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 83 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 36 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| = | HB 69 | ||
HB 83-FEDERAL LAWS & EXECUTIVE ORDERS
1:50:19 PM
CHAIR COGHILL announced the consideration of HB 83. [CSHB
83(JUD) was before the committee.]
1:50:39 PM
JIM POUND, Staff, Representative Wes Keller, sponsor of HB 83,
introduced the bill on behalf of the sponsor. He spoke to the
following sponsor statement: [Original punctuation provided.]
CS for HB 83 clarifies in Alaska Statute that a
federal statute, regulation, presidential executive
orders, or secretarial orders or actions that are not
properly adopted or are unconstitutional do not
preempt state law. The Attorney General will continue
to review and report federal statute, regulation,
presidential executive orders, or secretarial orders
or actions that appear to have not been properly
adopted. Under CSHB 83 those reports will be forwarded
to the legislature for consideration.
CSHB 83 presumes Alaska Legislative interest in an
important legal process known as nullification. It
opens the opportunity for the state to consider
proclaiming a federal law or rule to be void and
inoperative, or 'non-effective' within the boundaries
of that state. In CSHB 83 a negative review by the
Attorney General would generate an alert to our
Judiciary Committees so nullification legislation can
be considered.
There has been disagreement regarding nullification
going back to the late eighteenth century. Not
surprisingly, federal courts have often leaned toward
favoring federal power over state sovereignty in spite
of the fact that our founding fathers clearly intended
otherwise. Federalism is our historically unique and
profound arrangement where sovereign and separate
states got together and carefully designed a central
government with limited powers. It is an illogical
perversion of one of our most important founding
principles to presume states must comply with
unconstitutional federal language. CSHB 83 presumes a
proper State responsibility to uphold and protect our
constitution.
CSHB 83 is intended to provide important information
to the Alaska State Legislature by tapping the
expertise and evaluation of our Attorney General.
Certainly the legislature has a responsibility to
consider its response whenever there is question of
constitutionality of a federal statute, or the process
involved in regulation, presidential executive order,
or secretarial order or actions.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI summarized that the attorney general will
review federal statutes, regulations, executive orders and
actions and secretarial orders to make sure that they don't
conflict with state law.
MR. POUND clarified that there is already a review process, but
bringing the findings up under state law will be up to the
determination of the judiciary committees.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if there would be a timeline imposed
on the attorney general to review all of these documents because
it could be tens if not hundreds of thousands of pages.
MR. POUND said he couldn't speak to how the attorney general
does it now, but he did know that DOL provides information to
the governor's office. The bill ensures that the legislature is
included in the loop.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI highlighted that the bill doesn't ask the
attorney general to do anything new, just notify legislative
bodies if there are conflicts.
MR. POUND agreed.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if there are specific [federal]
statutes, regulations, or executive orders that he believes are
currently being violated.
1:54:39 PM
MR. POUND said he finds a recent interpretation from the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs interesting. He characterized a
letter sent to veterans about competency as excessive oversight
based on a regulation promulgated by the VA. He read the
following excerpt:
A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from
purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a
firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of
these provisions you may be fined, imprisoned, or both
under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the attorney general was filing a
lawsuit to overturn that for being unconstitutional.
MR. POUND said he was not aware of that.
1:55:53 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he would hope that the attorney
general would take legal action if an unconstitutional law is on
the books prohibiting veterans from getting firearms.
MR. POUND surmised that would happen at some point.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the sponsor asked for an increment
in the budget to fund this litigation.
MR. POUND responded that the Department of Law submitted a zero
fiscal note, and it probably would be some time before the issue
of litigation costs come up.
CHAIR COGHILL asked if the sponsor anticipated that the reports
called for in the bill would flow with other annual reports
coming out of the Department of Law (DOL).
MR. POUND said yes, and any issue that's identified and results
in legislation would still have to go through the legislative
process.
1:57:31 PM
CHAIR COGHILL said he'd like to hear from the DOL to understand
what is already taking place and how this bill will be
accommodated.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he likes the idea of DOL keeping the
legislature informed, but he'd also like an annual report about
litigation and the costs.
CHAIR COGHILL asked Mr. Pound to make arrangements with the
Department of Law to come before the committee to answer
questions.
MR. POUND acknowledged the request.
2:00:33 PM
SENATOR DYSON commended the effort and motive of the
legislation, and expressed hope that somebody was watching for
federal actions that affect how the legislature does its
business and fulfills its mission.
CHAIR COGHILL commented on the balance between working
cooperatively with the federal government and challenging
federal action.
He stated that he would hold HB 83 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB0081A.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| Sectional.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 81 |
| CSHB 83 -10 amend.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 CFR Costs.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Executive Orders.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHb 83 Law Fiscal.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Legis activity.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Mack US story.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHb 83 misuse of power.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 Null Void.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |
| CSHB 83 sectional.pdf |
SJUD 3/29/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 83 |