Legislature(2003 - 2004)
03/18/2003 01:47 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 67
An Act relating to construction of highways by the
Department of Transportation and Public Facilities.
REPRESENTATIVE JIM HOLM commented that the Alaska statute
requires that construction and maintenance contracts be
awarded to the private sector on the basis of competitive
bidding. However, statute also allows the State to fund
small projects or repairs in-house through a "force
account", meaning that the State uses its own forces to
accomplish the work.
To date, force account spending by Department of
Transportation & Public Facilities has been frequently used
to fund projects costing considerably more than $250,000
dollars. Such action takes dollars out of the private
sector and omits the checks and balance over-sight of the
competitive bidding process.
HB 67 was introduced to insure that State force accounts
continue to be allowed for smaller jobs while requiring that
projects over $250,000 dollars utilize private contractors
in the competitive bidding process. Private contractors not
only maintain an inventory of specialized equipment and
employ skilled managers, but they assume risk-costs, thus
providing the State with considerable savings.
Representative Hawker agreed that the bill makes sense,
however, the fiscal note indicates that assuming that the
forced account projects remain constant over the next six
years, the lost savings would total $25.6 million dollars.
Representative Holm responded that the analysis indicates
that potential loss. He added that he had not seen any back
up material to justify the number and that he believed it
was a "fear" tactic. He claimed that the fiscal note would
be zero and that putting a project out to bid would not cost
more.
Co-Chair Harris pointed out that the Department does not
support the bill. He acknowledged that the concept was
good, however, certain communities do have a difficult time
retaining Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
employees. If those employees were laid off in the summer,
there would be a tremendous amount of turn over. He asked
if there was a way to address this concern without affecting
the rural communities. Co-Chair Harris advised that he did
not support the bill; however, he would be willing to work
with Representative Holm.
MARK O'BRIEN, CHIEF CONTRACT OFFICIER, COMMISSIONER'S
OFFICE, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC FACILITIES,
stated that the effect of HB 67 would prohibit the
Department and any agency that transfers projects from using
its own employees to perform the work on projects that
exceed $250 thousand dollars. There are two categories of
projects that fall under the force account:
· Community roads
· State maintenance forces
Using capital funds, the Department is able to develop
programs within the three regions to address some of the
$200 million dollar backlog in the deferred maintenance
program.
Mr. O'Brien noted that there are four key benefits of the
program:
· Ability to transfers the cost of the winter
maintenance employees to federal aid money which
allows the Department to preserve general fund money
for severe wintertime events;
· Retain year round employees;
· Use the federal aid funds to fund a portion of the
equipment costs which then helps to defer the cost
of repair for maintenance activities; and
· Extend and utilize the money further.
TAPE HFC 03 - 36, Side A
Mr. O'Brien concluded his discussion regarding the four key
benefits.
Representative Stoltze asked if there was a definition of
"construction projects" for major capital and maintenance.
Co-Chair Williams stated that HB 67 would be HELD in
Committee for further consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|