Legislature(1997 - 1998)
04/08/1997 06:09 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 58 CIVIL ACTIONS/ATTY FEES/INSURANCE
Testimony was heard from JEFF BUSH. HB 58 was HELD for
further consideration.
HB 75 APPROPRIATIONS: OPERATING BUDGET
HB 76 APPROPRIATION: MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM
SENATOR PARNELL, Chair of the Information Technology
Subcommittee, testified on behalf of the subcommittee's
recommendations. Also testifying were SHARON BARTON,
KAREN MORGAN, WENDY REDMAN, and MARYLOU BURTON.
SENATOR PARNELL MOVED to incorporate the
recommendations into HB 75. SENATOR ADAMS objected.
The MOTION CARRIED on a vote of 6 to 1.
CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 58(FIN) am
"An Act relating to civil actions; relating to independent
counsel provided under an insurance policy; relating to
attorney fees; amending Rules 16.1, 41, 49, 58, 68, 72.1,
82, and 95, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; amending Rule
702, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and amending Rule 511, Alaska
Rules of Appellate Procedure."
SENATOR PHILLIPS brought up a letter from Bruce Cain
requesting a teleconference on the bill. He reiterated the
request. COCHAIR SHARP indicated that an attempt had been
made to teleconference but the operators were unavailable
for the evening meeting.
JEFFREY BUSH, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Commerce
and Economic Development, represented the administration
concerning HB 58, the tort reform bill. He was optimistic
that the negotiations going on between the interested
parties regarding the issues would result in a compromise.
He pointed out that the governor introduced similar
legislation developed by the task force on civil justice
reform and to the extent that HB 58 was consistent, they
supported it. He expressed some disappointment that the
task force proposals received little attention by the
legislature. The task force approach was that the problem
was primarily one of the cost of the system to the parties
involved. As much as sixty percent of damages paid are
eaten up by the system in court costs, attorney fees, expert
witnesses, et cetera. There were two ways to save money,
either to cut costs in the litigation process or cut off a
person's right to recover. The task force decided the
second option was inappropriate and unfair. They wanted to
make sure people's rights were retained and to save money in
the process by settling cases more quickly and to insure a
higher percentage of the money went to the deserving victim
rather than the attorneys and witnesses. He believed HB 58
was faulty in that regard. It contained provisions that had
been unanimously rejected by the task force because they
were not deemed to be fair to the litigants.
End SFC-97 #87, Side 1, Begin Side 2
In response to a question from SENATOR ADAMS, MR. BUSH
discussed the task force requirements to get a
recommendation or proposal to move forward. SENATOR ADAMS
inquired which were the high points of the task force that
were missing in HB 58. MR. BUSH responded that the most
significant missing pieces dealt with the process of
litigation. There had been a proposed pilot program for
alternative dispute resolution in an effort to achieve quick
resolution before they went to trial. Another
recommendation was that the District Court jurisdiction be
raised from $50 thousand to $100 thousand and have an
expedited process that required the litigants to go to trial
within one year. According to the sponsor, the reasons they
were not included in HB 58 was because the court system said
they would cost too much money. He disagreed with the court
system analysis. In response to a question from SENATOR
PHILLIPS, MR. BUSH stated that of the 21 members of the task
force, 9 held law degrees.
COCHAIR SHARP announced that HB 58 would be HELD for further
consideration. He called for a brief recess and turned the
gavel over to COCHAIR PEARCE.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|