Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 17
03/10/2011 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB57 | |
| HB158 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 158 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 57-BICYCLE PROGRAM
1:34:34 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the first order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 57, "An Act authorizing municipalities and
nonprofit organizations to sponsor a program to encourage the
safe use of bicycles as a mode of transportation, and amending
the duties of the Department of Transportation and Public
Facilities to include administration of state funds appropriated
for that purpose."
1:35:01 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT moved to adopt the proposed committee
substitute (CS) for HB 57, labeled 27-LS0315\B, Kane, 2/18/11 as
the working document. There being no objection, Version B was
before the committee.
1:36:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PAUL SEATON, Alaska State Legislature, explained
changes contained in the proposed committee substitute Version
B. He referred to page 2, to lines 1-2 of HB 57, which read,
"(2) educate the public on the safe use of bicycles and traffic
laws relating to bicycles and motor vehicles." This language was
in response to the committee's desire to have education a
prominent feature, and to allow people to apply for grants. He
referred to page 2, and line 7, which read, "(2) to establish
safety and education programs described in (a)(2) of this
section." This language allows for the grants just mentioned.
He referred to page 2, lines 19-20, which read, "(2) educating
the public on the safe use of bicycles and traffic laws relating
to bicycles and motor vehicles." Additionally, the dates of the
program survey in the bill are changed. He referred to page 3,
line 14, of HB 57, that the date changes from 2011 to 2012, and
on page 3, line 18 of HB 57, the date changes from to 2012 to
2014.
1:37:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN recalled viewing advertisements on
bicycle laws. He asked whether the department will air
additional media announcements or would use the same media
campaign.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON responded that not all communities have
television as the most available form of media. The bicycle
education programs may be accomplished by using flyers. Thus,
villages may have different programs than those offered in
cities such as Anchorage.
1:39:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether any small business bicycle
shop owners have contacted the sponsor. She related she has
received feedback and expressed concern over the potential
competition between businesses and local government.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON related he heard from Mr. Peter Roberts,
Downtown Bike Rental in Anchorage. Some shops in his district
in Homer are supportive of the bill since it will encourage and
promote bicycle use and users will upgrade to better bicycles.
He said it is a mixed bag and he acknowledged that some tourism
related businesses expressed concern that a community program
could negatively impact their business. However, there are
numerous ways, including building bicycle racks and storage to
enhance bicycle ownership, repair, and upgrades. He pointed out
that one thing he is also trying to promote are bicycle trailers
so people can transport groceries. He related that some
equipment can make bicycles safer so they can be used as a "mode
of transportation." He stated that municipalities are not trying
to compete with the tourism industry. However, numerous
communities do not have bicycle shops or bicycles of the type
that can be used as a mode of transportation. He suggested
people tend to use bicycles and then want better models.
1:42:58 PM
JEFF OTTESEN, Director, Division of Program Development,
Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF),
offered a brief comment. He recalled that at the last hearing
he stressed the importance of bicycling to Alaska. Alaska is
one of the leading states in terms of its citizens using
bicycles for commuting. He offered that the DOT&PF's only
suggestion was to clarify that education was permissible.
1:43:35 PM
DERRICK REYNOLDS, Owner, Cycle Logical, stated that he lives in
Homer and owns and operates Cycle Logical, a small bicycle
repair and retail shop. He said he fully supports HB 57. He
offered his belief that he understands the cycling community in
Homer. In the past five years he has witnessed a growing number
of cyclists ranging from children to dedicated cyclists and
commuters. He explained that most people express concern over
the lack of safe roads. He agreed with their concern. He said
the simple solution is to outlaw cars! He offered his belief
that the quickest way to reduce the number of cars and trucks on
roadways would be to encourage more people to ride bicycles. He
agreed HB 57 would not create a bicycle path along every road
but it could help fund a community bike garage for people to
use, perhaps allowing them to check out a bicycle. People may
be able to check out a grant funded trailer, lock, signage, or
bike rack. People could shop and return the trailer to the
garage. Similar bike share programs exist nationwide with
considerable success. He acknowledged the concern but as a
business owner believes that the program will help grow his
business. He reiterated that he understands the rental aspect,
but most people who want to rent a bicycle to obtain the "state
of the art" features and a bike share program may not offer the
high end bicycle features. He explained he lives in the
community and represents the cycling group. He stated that
several groups are actively working to improve conditions for
cyclists in Homer, all of whom have shown a commitment to
cycling. Cycling is a growing trend. He thinks this is an
important bill to pass. He thanked members for considering it.
In response to Chair P. Wilson, Mr. Reynolds responded that he
has not specifically contacted the city council for funding for
cycling programs.
1:48:13 PM
CHASE WARREN, Homer Cycling Club, stated that he has worked for
Cycle Logical for nearly two years. He related that he has
commuted primarily by bicycle for five years. He fully supports
HB 57, he said. This bill could significantly increase the
safety on our roads, not just for cyclists.
1:49:06 PM
CATRIONA LOWE, Member, Homer Cycling Club, stated she is a
resident of Homer and a long time cyclist. She is also a member
of the Homer Cycling Club. This nonprofit group was formed in
2010 to improve conditions for bicyclists at the local level and
to establish bicycle routes and mountain bike trails, host group
rides, to organize events such as races, and to promote
bicycling as an environmentally friendly and healthy choice.
She offered her belief that HB 57 holds great potential for
Alaskans. Using non motorized transportation such as bicycles
impacts lives in so many beneficial ways that even relatively
small amounts of money invested will have positive impact. One
thing she especially likes about HB 57 is that it allows each
community to develop their own programs to best meet the local
needs. One of the biggest needs in Homer is education for both
cyclists and motorists on rules of the road. The bill could be
used to provide classes and workshops. She uses her bicycle
year round. She has commuted over 60 percent of the days in
2011 and driven her car 670 miles thus far. Her bicycling has
personally reduced her fuel costs, wear and tear on the roads,
and on her vehicle. She encourages her children in grades 4 and
8 to ride their bicycles as much as possible. It provides
independent transportation, trips to the library and beach, and
a fun means to get exercise. Her children are in the minority
since many parents are worried about safety. She advocates the
state to provide funding as government provides a central role
in creating a seamless, safe transportation infrastructure,
including bicycle transportation infrastructure.
1:51:17 PM
MS. LOWE provided statistics, such as that bicycling and walking
provide 12 percent of the trips Americans make, but only cost
1.5 percent of transportation funding. Bicycles keep us
healthy, get us from point A to point B, save us from high gas
prices, make our air cleaner, and our roads less congested.
Bicycles are great for health, good for communities, and provide
a solution for many key societal challenges. Cost effective
investments in bicycling will boost the economy, help
individuals and the state save money, can help reduce challenges
such as obesity and road congestion, and benefit individuals,
communities, our state, and ultimately the nation. She offered
her belief that the state should invest in solutions that solve
multiple problems and "I think bicycling fits the bill."
1:52:10 PM
MICHAEL NEECE, City of Homer Economic Development Advisory
Commission, echoed Ms. Lowe's position and points. He is a
member of other groups that support bicycle use and public
transportation. He rides all the time and does not own a car.
He suggested a little more effort on the road shoulders would be
great during the winter. He hoped that this bill would help
elevate and educate people about bicycling. He offered his
support for HB 57.
1:53:36 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON asked whether Homer has any bike paths.
MR. NEECE related that Homer has one. He related that he served
on the Global Warming Task Force in 2006-2007 and that task
force worked to address bike paths. He pointed out the one bike
path is on Easton Road about two miles long. He lives on
Kachemak Drive, which does not have a bike path and is a
treacherous route. The community would like to develop more.
1:54:31 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN asked whether he uses studded tires on
his bicycle.
MR. NEECE answered no as studded tires sometimes provide a
person a sense of false security. He related that he either
walks or rides and pays attention to drivers.
1:55:15 PM
PETER ROBERTS, Owner, Downtown Bicycle Rental, stated that he
has listened to the testimony and has heard many assumptions.
He stated that the sponsor acknowledged that a chance for
competition exists. He asked how much competition and business
owners should lose before businesses have lost too much. He
recalled a Homer resident implying it would be better to have a
government run the bike share program because the bike rental
service would be better. He seemed to imply that bikes provided
by government would almost be unsafe bicycles. He asked whether
the program would anticipate insurance and liability issues if
someone is injured on one of the government sponsored bicycles.
He said many questions have arisen and the issues do not seem to
have been thought through. He recalled a similar bill was
introduced two years ago and the bill sponsor and cosponsor knew
he was opposed to the bill yet he was not informed of this bill
several days ago. It seemed to him that members should vote no,
the bill should go back to the drawing board, and the sponsor
should consult with affected constituents prior to introducing
legislation like this.
MR. ROBERTS emphasized that there is a lot wrong with this bill.
He said, "I will wave the flag for bicycling higher than anybody
that has testified so far. I rode my bike to this hearing and
there's no dispute about how great bikes are." The issue is
whether the government should intervene to change peoples'
behavior. The education aspect of the bill is good but giving
free maintenance, bikes, and trailers needs to be removed. He
suggested some testifiers think that it would be better if
government provided the trailers. He suggested the testifier
fill that niche himself. "That's the American way. I'll bet
you anything that he would do a better job. There would be
better availability of the trailers, and maybe if he's lucky
he'd earn a profit and pay some taxes. And that would help the
economy," he said. He suggested that private enterprise should
provide the bicycles and trailers and increase competition. He
urged the committee to vote no and fund infrastructure instead.
He stressed that government should fund bike racks and trails,
and make it more interesting for people to commute. He
highlighted that increasing trail safety and creating better
routes would provide incentives for bicycle commuters.
1:59:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked Mr. Roberts what the impediments are
to more people using bicycles.
MR. ROBERTS responded that he attended a conference several
years ago in Anchorage and the experts indicated the impediment
to bicycling is due to a lack of infrastructure. Commuters need
the right routes. If people cannot afford bicycles, government
could use "Bucks for Bikes" vouchers to patronize an existing
business. He stressed that infrastructure is the number one
issue, and the second would be to support voucher programs.
2:00:54 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced she would leave public testimony open.
[HB 57 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB57 State Farm letter of support.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB057-DOA-DOF-03-04-11.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 opposition ltr Roberts.htm |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| CSHB57 2-18-11.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB0158A.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| HB 158 Sponsor Statement.docx |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| HB 158 KABATA pro-forma.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| hb57 NFIB ltr of opoosition.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB158 Jan 2011 KABATA survey (2).pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| HB 158 Knik Arm Crossing Summary.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| HB158 Houston Resolution 09-05 KABATA.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| HB 158 Knik Arm Crossing White Paper.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| HB158 Knik Arm Crossing TIFIA-LOI.pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |
| HB158 Knik Arm Crossing TIFIA Cover (2).pdf |
HTRA 3/10/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 158 |