Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120
04/16/2019 03:00 PM House STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s) | |
| Commissioner, Department of Public Safety | |
| Lieutenant Governor Successor | |
| Chief Administrative Law Judge | |
| Alaska State Commission for Human Rights|| Alaska Department of Corrections Parole Board|| Alaska State Personnel Board|| Alaska Public Offices Commission|| Alaska Police Standard Council | |
| HB50|| HB51 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 51 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 50 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
HB 50-ARREST;RELEASE;SENTENCING;PROBATION
HB 51-PROBATION; PAROLE; SENTENCES; CREDITS
4:23:20 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 50, "An Act relating to pretrial release;
relating to sentencing; relating to treatment program credit
toward service of a sentence of imprisonment; relating to
electronic monitoring; amending Rules 38.2 and 45(d), Alaska
Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective
date." and HOUSE BILL NO. 51, "An Act relating to probation;
relating to a program allowing probationers to earn credits for
complying with the conditions of probation; relating to early
termination of probation; relating to parole; relating to a
program allowing parolees to earn credits for complying with the
conditions of parole; relating to early termination of parole;
relating to eligibility for discretionary parole; relating to
good time; and providing for an effective date."
CO-CHAIR FIELDS expressed his concerns regarding the
circumstances surrounding the resignation of Quinlan Steiner, as
Director of the Public Defender Agency (PDA), Department of
Administration (DOA). Mr. Steiner had tendered his resignation
effective on appointment of a new public defender appointed by
the Alaska Judicial Counsel consistent with AS 18.85.030. Co-
Chair Fields offered that his concern is that [Governor Michael
J. Dunleavy] has accelerated the dismissal of Mr. Steiner and
appointed an interim public defender, and the statute does not
give him the authority to do so. He maintained the public
defender is, by design, an independent position, and the public
defender can only be removed for cause. He asserted that is an
important principle in terms of a public defender advising the
legislature on matters of criminal justice and not being subject
to political pressure. He said that currently there is no
public defender nominated by the judicial council, which impairs
the legislature's ability to ensure a fair hearing on the crime
and public safety legislation.
4:25:05 PM
JOHN SKIDMORE, Director, Criminal Division, Department of Law
(DOL), on behalf of the House Rules Standing Committee, sponsor
of HB 51, by request of the governor, relayed that HB 51 is
designed to address probation and parole. He referred to the
document, entitled "HB 51 Probation and Parole Highlights" and
included in the committee packet, which read in part:
• Caps on Sanctions for Technical Violations and
Absconding Repeals the caps on the sanctions for
technical violations (currently 3, 5, and 10 days for
the first three violations respectively) and
absconding (up to 30 days). Returns discretion to
judges and the parole board to impose a sanction
appropriate for the offender, the type of violation,
and the underlying offense.
MR. SKIDMORE explained that Senate Bill 91 [passed during the
Twenty-Ninth Alaska State Legislature, 2015-2016, and signed
into law 7/11/16] placed caps on the amount of time that could
be imposed for either probation or parole violations; however,
the caps, instead of being for a single violation, ended up
being for the entire petition. Consequently, there can be many
violations, but the maximum sanction that can be imposed is
three days. He added that returning discretion to judges and
the parole board allows them to consider the underlying offense,
the length of time the offender has been under supervision, the
number of past allegations or violations that have occurred, and
the current allegations.
4:29:05 PM
MR. SKIDMORE moved on to the second bullet in the document to
review the proposal for earned compliance credits (ECC), which
read in part:
• Earned Compliance Credits Reduces credits to one
day for every three days without a violation. If a
person violates their probation or parole they will
lose all credits accrued up until the violation and
have to start over. Prohibits sex offenders from
earning credits.
MR. SKIDMORE explained that currently, every day that an
offender is on probation or parole without a violation, his/her
probation or parole time may be reduced by one day. The
proposed legislation changes that ratio to 3:1, such that every
three days of good behavior earns one day off.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked whether there is any evidence to
justify the change.
MR. SKIDMORE answered that there has been no research on it;
however, during the time of its implementation, there have been
problems with calculating ECC. He maintained that the proposed
legislation would help with the calculations. He stated that
when the state and the Alaska Criminal Justice Commission (ACJC)
evaluated probation and parole, they learned that keeping
offenders on probation and parole for very long periods of time
was not helpful. They considered three options - ECC, early
termination, and reduced maximum periods of probation that could
be imposed - and ended up adopting all three. The proposed
legislation offers a more "digestible" and balanced approach.
He added that the 1:3 ratio was recently adopted by the federal
government for ECC, as well as some other states.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS referred to page 2 of the Department of
Corrections (DOC) fiscal note (FN) [Identifier: LL0031-2-DOC-
PP-01-22-19], included in the committee packet, and pointed out
the analysis relays several scenarios with estimated costs but
no total. He asked why DOC did not total the costs and what the
total additional costs would be for offenders being in
incarceration longer.
MR. SKIDMORE responded that he was not prepared to answer
questions about the DOC FN.
4:36:25 PM
MR. SKIDMORE continued with the third bullet in the document,
which read in part:
• Early Termination Of Probation And Parole Returns
to a true recommendation of the probation or parole
officer instead of a mandated recommendation after 1
or 2 years without violation.
MR. SKIDMORE explained that before Senate Bill 91, a parole
officer had the ability to recommend termination of probation
and parole based on his assessment as to whether the offender
was a good candidate for it. Under Senate Bill 91, instead of a
recommendation, it became a requirement to recommend the
termination of probation and parole after one year. Under HB
51, the recommendation would again be based on the individual's
history and behavior.
REPRESENTATIVE WOOL asked whether the option of early
termination was used very much.
MR. SKIDMORE relayed that he could answer the question only in
terms of probation, since his experience is as a prosecutor. He
said that he did see recommendations but could not give
statistics. He added that more frequently he saw what is called
"placing someone on a minimum bank." He explained that an
offender is required to report to the probation officer once a
month; if the person was doing well, the probation officer would
shift that person to the minimum bank, which means the offender
no longer must report on a monthly basis. This lessened the
restrictions of probation.
4:42:25 PM
MR. SKIDMORE continued reviewing the highlights of HB 51 by
addressing parole. He mentioned that he would be discussing two
areas of parole: 1) the eligibility for parole; and 2) a
determination of who should be released on parole. He explained
parole by way of the following example: An individual is
sentenced in court to five years in jail - with two years
suspended and three years to serve. The two years that are
suspended is the length of time that "hangs over the person's
head" so that if he/she violates a condition of probation, there
is the potential that those two years could be imposed. Parole
refers to the scenario in which the person is released from jail
prior to the completion of the three years and is returned to
the community; there are conditions set for parole, and if the
person violates conditions of parole, the person may be required
to return to jail to serve the remainder of the sentence.
MR. SKIDMORE said that there are two types of parole - mandatory
and discretionary. Mandatory parole, also known as "good time,"
occurs when someone is released from prison early - after
serving approximately two-thirds of the sentence - and is meant
to help the person adjust back out to the community and
alleviate prison overcrowding. Parole eligibility, under HB 51,
refers to discretionary parole. Discretionary parole is when
the offender applies for early release after serving approximate
one-third of his/her sentence; this early release is earlier
than mandatory release. The parole board evaluates the case and
decides whether the person is a good candidate for release. In
the example, the person would be eligible for discretionary
parole after one year.
MR. SKIDMORE relayed that under Senate Bill 91, the eligibility
for discretionary parole was broadened. He reviewed the changes
in eligibility for discretionary parole under HB 51, shown on
the document, which read in part:
• Parole Eligibility Returns to restricting what
crimes are eligible for discretionary parole. Makes
the following crimes ineligible:
• Non-sex class A felonies (Robbery 1, Assault 1,
Arson 1, Escape 1, MIW 1);
• B felonies if the person had one or more prior
felony convictions;
• C felonies if the person had two or more prior
felony convictions; and
• B and C sex felonies (Sexual Assault 2, Sexual
Abuse of a Minor 2, Distribution of Child
Pornography).
4:47:40 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS opened public testimony on HB 50 and HB 51.
4:48:08 PM
KATIE BOTZ said she supports the idea of HB 51. She opined that
there should be stronger policy to not allow probationers to
repeat crimes upon release. She suggested classes could be
offered to help people on probation be successful when their
probation period ends. She indicated the classes could help a
person with his/her work success and state of mind. She said
Alaska ranks number one for sex crimes, and she said "they" are
the ones that should have "maximum probation punishment without
any parole."
4:50:53 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 4:51 p.m. to 4:52 p.m.
4:51:49 PM
LYNETTE CLARK, Chair, Alaska Independence Party, stated concern
that the legislation does not have "any real teeth." She said
she would like to see HB 50 and HB 51 not passed. She said she
supports what the Senate has done regarding the Crime Bill, and
she wants to see Senate Bill 91 repealed. She expressed
appreciation for the work that has been done on HB 50 and HB 51,
but indicated that the Senate's proposed legislation is more in
depth and focused on making criminals pay for what they have
done. She reiterated that she cannot support HB 50 and HB 51.
4:53:04 PM
NORIA CLARK stated that she used to feel safe [in Anchorage,
Alaska]. She said she once lived in Chicago, where her mother
survived being shot on her way to work; she once lived in
Southern Arizona, where there is drug cartel and constant crime.
She said Senate Bill 91 gives more rights to criminals than law-
abiding citizens have. She stated, "Currently we are number one
in multiple violent and non-violent crimes per capita." She
said these crimes includes those sexual violence, car and
property theft. Ms. Clark talked about voting and that the
people of Alaska will take back their power. She said there are
those who represent Alaskans and those who only claim to do so.
She stated that Senate Bill 91 should be repealed, with new law
put in the books directing how to handle criminals. She said
time given to allow Senate Bill 91 to work is time wasted when
it results in lives lost. She characterized Alaska as "a
nightmare game of Monopoly," where there is "get out of jail
free" and taxes on those who must "pay for it," because
"criminals don't pay taxes." Ms. Clark stated that HB 50 and HB
51 are only Band-Aids. She posited that Alaska is probably the
last state in the Union that could actually be saved. She
concluded by saying that she is tired of being afraid.
4:55:29 PM
BERT HOUGHTALING stated that he is disturbed to hear it said
that people do not understand what is wrong with Senate Bill 91.
He stated support of "anything that Governor Dunleavy is trying
to pass right now," and suggested that HB 50 and HB 51 could be
a good start toward getting tougher on criminals who are repeat
offenders.
4:56:55 PM
CO-CHAIR FIELDS closed public testimony on HB 50 and HB 51.
CO-CHAIR FIELDS announced that HB 50 and HB 51 would be held
over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Dept. of Public Safety Commissioner Price - CJIS Security 4.16.19.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 50 ver A.PDF |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB 50 - Pretrial Highlights.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB 50 - Pretrial Sectional.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB 50 - Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 ver A 2.20.19.PDF |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Pretrial Highlights 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Pretrial Sectional 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Transmittal Letter 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Additional Document - Crime Bill GOA Bills Matrix 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Fiscal Note DPS-PrisTrans 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Fiscal Note DOC-Pretrial 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Fiscal Note DOC-IDO 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Fiscal Note LAW-CRM 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Fiscal Note DOA-OPA 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Fiscal Note DOA-PDA 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Fiscal Note JUD-ACS 3.19.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Opposing Doucment - Functioning Model of a Community Corrections System 3.19.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB051 ver A 2.20.19.PDF |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Highlights 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Sectional Analysis 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Transmittal Letter 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Additional Document - Crime Bill GOA Bills Matrix 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Fiscal Note DOC-IDO 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Fiscal Note LAW-CRM 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Fiscal Note DOC-DPP 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 3/19/2019 3:00:00 PM HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB050 Supporting Document - Letter of Support AACOP 3.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Opposing Document - Letter of Opposition 4.16.19.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB050 Supporting Document - Letters of Support 4.15.2019 - 4.16.2019.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 50 |
| HB051 Supporting Document - Letter of Support AACOP 3.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Supporting Document - Letters of Support 4.15.2019 - 4.16.2019.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Opposing Document - Letter of Opposition 4.16.19.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 |
| HB051 Additional Docment - GOA Bills Matrix 2.20.19.pdf |
HSTA 4/16/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 51 SB 91 |