Legislature(2017 - 2018)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
04/16/2018 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB134 | |
| HJR21 | |
| HB44 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 134 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HJR 21 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 123 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 208 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 81 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 44 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 44-LEGISLATIVE ETHICS: VOTING & CONFLICTS
2:08:19 PM
CHAIR COGHILL reconvened the meeting and announced the
consideration of HB 44. [SCS CSSSHB 44(STA) was before the
committee.] He noted that the State Affairs Committee
significantly changed the bill.
2:08:58 PM
RYAN JOHNSTON, Staff, Representative Jason Grenn, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, reviewed the following changes
from version R to version N and for HB 44:
The sections of Version R can be found in the
corresponding sections of Version N
? Ver R Section 1 corresponds with Section 7 in ver N
? Ver R Section 2 corresponds with Section 8 in ver N
? Ver R Section 3 corresponds with Section 9 in ver N
? Ver R Section 4 corresponds with Section 11 in ver N
The new sections of the bill include:
Sections 1 and 2 prohibits foreign corporations and
nationals from making political expenditures on behalf
of candidates in state elections.
Section 3, page 6 lines 5-12, amends AS 24.10.120(a)
to implement a stricter policy on legislative foreign
travel.
Section 4, page 6 lines 5-12, amends AS 24.10.130(b)
so there will be no per diem for legislators after 121
days if the budget has not been passed
Section 5, page 6 lines 25-31, amends AS 24.10.130(c)
to direct the Legislative Council to adopt a per diem
policy in accordance with section 4 of the bill.
Section 6, page 8 lines 1-12, amends AS 24.45.121(a)
to read that a lobbyist may only purchase a non-
alcoholic beverage for a legislator.
Section 10, page 9, amends AS 24.10.120(a) to clarify
that a Legislator can accept a non-alcoholic beverage
from a lobbyist.
Section 12, page 11 line 4-19, amends AS 39.23.540(d)
to include the new stipulations on per diem set forth
in section 4.
Section 13, page 11, line 20, repeals AS 24.10.051(b).
Section 14, page 11 lines 21-24, amends the uncodified
law of the State of Alaska to direct the Alaska Public
Office Commission to adopt the necessary regulations
to implement sections 1 and 2 of this bill.
Section 15, page 11 lines 27-31, amends the uncodified
law of the State of Alaska to state that if any
section of this bill is found invalid, then the rest
of the bill will not be affected.
Section 16, page 12 line 1, states that section 14 of
the bill will take effect immediately upon the bill's
passage.
Section 17, page 12 line 2, changes the effective date
to July 1, 2018.
2:11:49 PM
CHAIR COGHILL said he understands that the only difference
between the initiative and the bill is the de minimis value of a
meal versus the $15 amount which is in statute.
MR. JOHNSTON agreed.
2:12:55 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if the sponsor supports the Senate
committee substitute.
MR. JOHNSTON replied, "The Representative is appreciative of the
conversation that goes on with this bill and appreciates the
ability to speak before the committee and apologizes that he
can't be here currently."
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI commented that it was a good political
answer.
CHAIR COGHILL said he'd like to dialog with the sponsor on the
record about the policy calls. He offered his perspective of the
per diem provision. He struggles with it because extended
sessions aren't always within the legislature's control. He said
he can understand why some people don't support international
travel, but "whether we like it or not Alaska is an
international state." Its largest trading partners are China,
Japan, Korea, and Canada. Furthermore, Alaska is an Arctic
state, the Pacific fishery is international, and tourism has an
international flavor. He said he would study the language, but
to exclude the impact an international conversation might have
on a campaign might be unwise. He opined that legislators may
need to be part of both national and international
organizations. He said he understands that money is perceived as
buying elections, but it's up to the integrity of the individual
whether the money is used as a voice to communicate with
constituents or if it's used to drive special interests.
2:19:40 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI asked if there is any legal opinion or
consultation about whether the current version of the bill would
take the initiative off the ballot.
MR. JOHNSTON responded that the Senate State Affairs Committee
received a legal memo that said the current version of the bill
satisfies the intent of the initiative. However, it would rest
on a court case. He offered to supply a copy of the memo.
CHAIR COGHILL advised that the 3/21/18 memorandum from
legislative attorney Dan Wayne is in the packets.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he read the memo and it seems to
address constitutional issues as opposed to whether it would
take the initiative off the ballot.
2:21:40 PM
MR. JOHNSTON said any constitutional concerns will only be
resolved through a court case. He offered to have someone from
the lieutenant governor's office come and talk about its finding
that the initiative was not unconstitutional.
CHAIR COGHILL relayed that testimony in the State Affairs
Committee was that being constitutional to go on the ballot is
one question and whether the policy calls are constitutional is
another, larger question. Legal advice on that point is
warranted.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI noted that the memo did raise the question
about the effect of the bill in an initiative election. The
conclusion is not a slam dunk in either direction, but it does
say the court would probably find the bill passes the three-part
test.
CHAIR COGHILL shared that he is not a fan of either the
initiative or the bill because of the restrictions that may be
outside legislators' control. It also supposes the authority of
lobbyists that may not be entirely accurate. He reiterated the
request to have a dialog on the record with the sponsor during
the 9:00 a.m. meeting tomorrow.
MR. JOHNSTON said the sponsor has a Finance meeting at the same
time but he would do his best.
2:26:05 PM
CHAIR COGHILL held HB 44 in committee for further consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 44 - Explanation of Changes (ver. R to ver. N).pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| CS to HJR 21 - Version J.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
HJR 21 |
| SB 134 - Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 - Sectional Analysis (ver. A).pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 - Supporting Document - Economist - A Question of Proof.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 - Supporting Document - CNN Article.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 - Supporting Document - Examples Where AS is Misinterpreted.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 - Supporting Document - Leg. Research Report.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 - Supporting Document - Juneau Empire Article.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |
| SB 134 - Letter of Support - Miles Curtis.pdf |
SJUD 4/16/2018 1:30:00 PM |
SB 134 |