Legislature(2019 - 2020)BARNES 124
03/18/2019 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s): Real Estate Commission | |
| HB48 | |
| HB44 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 48 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 44 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 44-AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES: FEES
4:11:39 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX announced that the final order of business would
be HOUSE BILL NO. 44, "An Act relating to fees for using an
automated teller machine; and providing for an effective date."
4:12:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DAN ORTIZ, Alaska State Legislature, as prime
sponsor, presented HB 44. He paraphrased parts of the sponsor
statement [included in the committee packet], which read in its
entirety as follows [original punctuation provided]:
The intent of this bill is to allow retail automatic
teller machines (ATMs) to charge a withdraw fee on
transactions made by international bank card holders.
Currently, independently owned ATMs are not able to
charge a fee on transactions made by international
card holders. Our current law only pertains to ATMs
owned by state-sponsored banks or credit unions, and
does not include retail and individually owned ATMs.
Because of this gap, retail ATMs cannot charge a
withdraw fee on transactions from bank cards outside
of the United States.
Alaska welcomes millions of visitors each year, with a
large percentage of those visitors from out of the
country. In the summer of 2016 alone, nearly 300,000
international visitors came to Alaska. Retail ATM
owners cannot charge fees on these tourists'
transactions.
Multiple other states have already passed laws to
close this gap and allow retail ATM owners to charge a
transaction fee to international card holders.
4:14:11 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX asked if domestic card holders can be charged a
withdraw fee.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ answered yes. He explained that the
current bill would "close the gap" and allow privately owned
ATMs to charge international users [a withdraw fee], adding
that, currently, retail ATM owners charge domestic card holders
more to make up for the rates they don't receive from
international users. He stated that the current bill would
allow private owners to set a fee for withdraws made by
international card users, which would increase their revenue
from international tourists. He further noted that HB 44 has
received support from Alaskan ATM owners; the Alaska Cabaret,
Hotel, Restaurant and Retailers Association (CHARR) and the
National ATM Council, Inc. (NAC).
4:15:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES inquired as to the difference between an
international user and a "regular" user.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ explained that an international user was
"anyone from a foreign country other than the United States."
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES surmised that an international user would
be recognized by his or her bank being located outside of the
United States. She asked if this was correct.
4:16:33 PM
CAROLINE HAMP, Staff, Representative Dan Ortiz, Alaska State
Legislature, on behalf of Representative Ortiz, prime sponsor of
HB 44, acknowledged that it was the card holders' bank, not
their nationality, that was significant.
4:16:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN said she had made the presumption that if
an ATM couldn't charge a fee then the bank card wouldn't work,
when, in reality, an international card holder can use the ATM,
but no fee is recovered.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ said that was correct.
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked if ATM owners were allowed to block
users if they couldn't charge them a fee.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ replied that he did not know the answer to
that question.
4:17:52 PM
CO-CHAIR WOOL, as an ATM owner himself, disclosed a conflict of
interest. In response to Representative Hannan, he explained
that he bought his [ATM] machine from a private company who
processes the transactions and compensates him monthly. He said
he was unsure as to whether that company can block transactions
from specific banks, adding that foreign card holders most
likely use the machine without being charged the withdraw fee.
Nonetheless, he revealed that even if they had to pay the
withdraw fee and he was making money off every transaction, he
still wouldn't be inclined to lower the fee. He concluded by
expressing his support for the current bill.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES sought clarification on the withdraw fee
and whether it concerned the exchange rate or if it was simply
the extra fee a card holder is charged when they use an ATM
machine that does not belong to their bank.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ confirmed that it was the extra fee.
4:20:53 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX recognized Bruce Renard and asked him if private
ATM machine owners can block foreign transactions.
BRUCE RENARD, Executive Director, National ATM Council, Inc.
(NAC), pointed out that it's a misnomer to refer to an ATM as
"private" because each one has a sponsoring bank. He explained
that 60 percent of ATMs in the United States are owned by
entrepreneurs and business owners and referred to as
"independent ATMs," despite being operated pursuant to their
sponsoring bank.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX interjected, asking Mr. Renard if he could
answer her previously stated question and save the rest for
public testimony.
MR. RENARD consented and offered his belief that, technically,
blocking [foreign transactions] could be done, but it would be
in violation of the network rules. He explained that all ATMs
are subject to compliance with the rules of the global finance
network, who wouldn't approve of blocking. He further described
the situation [in Alaska] as "a catch-22" because ATMs must
allow these international transactions that, theoretically,
could be blocked. He noted that Alaska is the last state with
this glitch.
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX inquired as to why her Wells Fargo bank card
only works in certain ATM machines when she travels
internationally.
MR. RENARD stated that different countries have different
protocols, however, Visa and Mastercard cards should work
everywhere, which is why they are so dominant. He remarked
that, in general, ATMs should accept US cards abroad, and if
they don't it's unique to that country.
4:24:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN stated that she intended to support this
piece of legislation because Alaska receives so many
international visitors. She asked if a statute had been passed
to allow ATMs to charge fees on domestic card holders'
transactions. She sought clarification as to why, in an
industry that is highly regulated by the federal government,
Alaska was the last state with this glitch concerning
transaction fees. She asked if international fees were excluded
from federal banking law.
REPRESENTATIVE ORTIZ offered his understanding that when
regulations around ATM use were established, they left
independently owned machines out of the equation. He explained
that, currently, institutions like Wells Fargo can charge a fee,
but for some reason, Alaska remains the one place where
individually owned ATMs cannot charge international users. He
added that passing the current bill would put Alaska on par with
the other 49 states.
4:26:44 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX opened public testimony.
4:27:21 PM
MR. RENARD addressed the intent of the current bill, which is to
solve the glitch that is specific to Alaska and its interaction
with the global network rules. That interaction has resulted in
the inability of Alaska's independently owned ATMs to charge a
reasonable fee on transactions made by international bank card
holders. He pointed out that federal law placed a fee
disclosure requirement and the ability to opt out on any
surcharge established by ATM owners. This has resulted in
independently owned ATM surcharges remaining low, generally
within two to three dollars, whereas surcharges from Bank ATMs
(other than one's own) may be twice as high. He reiterated that
HB 44 would fix the glitch that is currently in Alaska law by
allowing ATMs to charge the same fees to international card
holders as they do domestic card holders. By doing so, he said,
it would create a level playing field between bank owned ATMs
and independently owned ATMs.
4:33:07 PM
PAUL THOMAS, Owner, Alaska Cache Liquor Inc, noted that he owned
the ATM located inside his business as well as 14 other ATMs in
Juneau. He stated that the current bill would put independently
owned ATMs on par with all the other ATMs. He pointed out the
impact that being located close to international traveler
departure points has on ATM operators. The docks, being a
prominent departure point for international cruise ship
passengers, means independent ATMS in that area will see a
considerable amount of "no charge" fees, which could prompt
owners to raise the surcharge. He urged members to even "the
playing field."
4:34:07 PM
SARAH OATES, President/CEO, Alaska Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant
and Retailers Association (CHARR), noted that she was
representing many business owners from across the state, many of
whom have independent ATMs in their establishments. She
expressed their support for the current bill, as it would allow
for independent ATM owners to collect the same fee as large
financial institutions. She stated that current law puts small
business owners at a disadvantage by forcing them to "eat the
cost" of international fees rather than passing them on to
consumers. She concluded by reiterating that Alaska CHARR fully
supports "this very fair piece of legislation that would help
small Alaskan businesses."
4:35:12 PM
CO-CHAIR LEDOUX closed public testimony and announced that HB 44
was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Tavoliero_Redacted.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
Commission Hearing: Michael Tavoliero |
| HB044 Sectional Analysis 2.26.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Sponsor Statement 2.26.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB 44 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 ver A 3.15.19.PDF |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Supporting Document-Support Letters 2.26.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Supporting Document-Support Letter National ATM Council 3.15.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| 2019.HB 44.Backup Support Letters.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB044 Additional Document-ATM Location Study 3.15.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 44 |
| HB048 Sponsor Statement 3.4.19.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 48 |
| HB0048 ver M 3.4.19.PDF |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 48 |
| HB 48 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HL&C 3/18/2019 3:15:00 PM HL&C 3/20/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 48 |