Legislature(2015 - 2016)CAPITOL 106
03/12/2015 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation: Division of Public Health | |
| Presentation: Facing Foster Care in Alaska | |
| HB40 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 40 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 40-USE OF ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES AS SMOKING
4:37:01 PM
VICE CHAIR VAZQUEZ announced that the final order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 40, "An Act relating to the use of
electronic cigarettes; and providing for an effective date."
4:37:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE BOB HERRON, Alaska State Legislature, expressed
his appreciation for products available to help curtail tobacco
use. He declared that his concern was with safe disposal of the
exhaled aerosol. He expressed his desire for e-cigarette use to
only be in an area where smoking was allowed.
4:38:45 PM
VICE CHAIR VAZQUEZ opened public testimony.
4:38:57 PM
MISTY MICHELLE JENSEN said that she was speaking for herself,
and she stated her support of HB 40 to treat electronic
cigarettes the same as traditional cigarettes, with regard to
the second hand smoke. She cited the Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) and stated that the vapor from an e-cigarette was
an aerosol which contained nicotine and toxic chemicals and was
not safe to smoke or inhale. She declared that she was
horrified by the messages in advertisements and stores which
promoted e-cigarettes as safe. She emphasized that "this simply
is not true." She stated that there was a danger for the re-
normalization of smoking with the emergence of these new
products and that it was necessary for the leaders in health
care to send a clear message that smoking included the use of
electronic cigarettes.
4:40:31 PM
EMILY NENON, Alaska Government Relations Director, American
Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, directed attention to a
letter dated March 4, 2015 [Included in members' packets]
declaring support of HB 40. She reported that there were
hundreds of different products being marketed as electronic (e)
cigarettes, and that, as they were unregulated, the ingredients
were unknown. She pointed out that the proposed bill would
strictly address exposure to the second hand aerosol from these
e-cigarettes. She explained that the difference between a vapor
and an aerosol was that an aerosol contained fine particles of
liquid and/or solids. She cited a "growing number of studies
that have looked at the contents of e-cigarette aerosol" and
listed propylene glycol, nicotine, and flavorings, as well as
heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, tobacco-specific
nitrosamines, and other potentially harmful chemicals as the
most common ingredients. She declared concern for second hand
exposure to these ingredients.
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES asked for the studies that supported her
statements. She shared that her research indicated "maybe,
possibly, could be, and it appears that there's just not enough
information to classify these as a tobacco type cigarette." She
directed attention to a March 12, 2015 study which did not find
any health concerns in e-cigarette vapors. She stated that this
was "clearly a pretty controversial issue." She acknowledged
the position taken by Ms. Nenon, as she was employed by the
American Cancer Society. She declared that there was not enough
evidence to convince her [that the vapors were dangerous.]
MS. NENON offered to supply the necessary studies and continue
the discussion.
4:44:53 PM
JAY BUTLER, MD, Chief Medical Officer/Director, Division of
Public Health, Central Office, Department of Health and Social
Services, said that:
it may well be that aerosol's from e-cigarettes pose
less of a threat from second hand exposure than
traditional cigarettes, but I would caution against
assuming that they are safe, given that studies have
shown that metabolites of nicotine are recoverable
from people who are exposed to aerosol's from e-
cigarettes secondhand.
DR. BUTLER allowed that the Division of Public Health had
struggled with the question of where e-cigarettes fell on the
spectrum of risk. He shared that the division had recently
completed a literature review, and he offered to supply copies
of this to the committee for reference. He stated that,
although there was the potential for use of e-cigarettes as a
harm reduction technique or a smoking cessation tool, some of
the data suggested that they were being used as a way to deliver
supplemental nicotine. He directed attention to the ways this
product was marketed, as a way to smoke when smoking was not
allowed. He expressed concern that, although a lot of progress
had been made in smoking reduction in youth, the marketing of
the flavoring in e-cigarettes was focused on a young
demographic.
DR. BUTLER highlighted the threat for e-cigarettes to re-
normalize smoking behavior. He pointed out that, as e-
cigarettes were not regulated, the aerosol ingredients were
considered proprietary information, which posed a threat to
indoor air quality. He emphasized that the goals of HB 40 to
only allow e-cigarette use in places where cigarette smoking is
not prohibited "makes good public health sense."
4:48:03 PM
ASHLEY PELTIER stated her support of HB 40, to treat electronic
cigarettes the same as traditional cigarettes with regard to
secondhand smoke exposure. She reported that the vapor emitted
had been shown to contain ultra-fine particles which exacerbated
respiratory issues when inhaled, and had been shown to contain
chemicals such as benzene, cadmium, and formaldehyde. She noted
that there were particularly enticing flavors added to appeal to
youth. She reminded the committee that the tobacco industry had
previously stated that second hand smoke was harmless and that
smoking was good for us. She expressed her reluctance to trust
the tobacco industry statements that e-cigarettes and second
hand aerosol were safe, and that no one should unknowingly be
exposed to a substance that can harm them. She declared that
everyone had the right to breathe clean air.
4:49:45 PM
CLAY BEZENEK stated that he was against HB 40, although he
understood the reasoning behind the proposed bill. He suggested
that there should be federal legislation to regulate the
industry. He shared that he knew many people who had quit
smoking because of e-cigarettes. He declared that he was anti-
smoking, and that he was often annoyed to continually smell
cigarette smoke. He opined that this was a positive step for
the tobacco industry to market e-cigarettes, although this
proposed regulation was "a little pre-mature" as it vilified
people or forced them to move. He noted that he needed to see
conclusive evidence that the vapor was harmful.
4:52:32 PM
VICE CHAIR VAZQUEZ stated that public testimony would be kept
open and that HB 40 would be held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 40-Opposition-assorted form emails_2.pdf |
HHSS 3/12/2015 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/2/2015 3:00:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| Div Public Health Presentation HHSS 12Mar2015.pdf |
HHSS 3/12/2015 3:00:00 PM |
Presentations by DHSS |
| HB 40-American Cancer Network E-cigarettes and smokefree laws.pdf |
HHSS 3/12/2015 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/2/2015 3:00:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB 40 Opposition_Finney_3-11-15.pdf |
HHSS 3/12/2015 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/2/2015 3:00:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB40 -Support email.pdf |
HHSS 3/12/2015 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/2/2015 3:00:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB40-Written Public Testimony-Opposition-3.16.2015.pdf |
HHSS 3/12/2015 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/2/2015 3:00:00 PM |
HB 40 |
| HB40-Written Public Testimony-Support-3.16.2015.pdf |
HHSS 3/12/2015 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/2/2015 3:00:00 PM |
HB 40 |