Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
04/16/2021 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s):|| Violent Crimes Compensation Board | |
| HB116 | |
| HB39 | |
| HB29 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| *+ | HB 39 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 116 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 39-VOTER PREREGISTRATION FOR MINORS
1:37:53 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 39, "An Act relating to voter preregistration for
minors at least 16 years of age."
1:38:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRIER HOPKINS, Alaska State Legislature,
presented HB 39 as prime sponsor. He stated that he had
sponsored HB 39 as part of an ongoing effort to take a detailed
look at ways to improve the electoral process and to encourage
young Alaskans to become active and informed voters. He stated
that he had received interest in the bill from young Alaskans,
local educators, and fellow legislators. He stated that the
main intent of the bill is to allow individuals at 16 years of
age to register [prior to becoming eligible to vote at age
eighteen], and that HB 39 would not change the voting age. He
suggested that the passage of the bill would further voter
education and engagement by providing an additional tool for
civics educators. He stated that 23 states and Washington, D.C.
currently offer some form of preregistration for individuals
under 18. He stated that in the State of North Dakota voters
are not required to register to vote, and encouraged the
committee to review the information contained in committee
packet items including those entitled, "HB 39 Supporting
Document - Data Excerpts 4.16.2021," "HB 39 Research Document -
Increasing Youth Participation The Case for a National Voter
Pre-Registration Law 2012 4.16.2021," "HB 39 Research Document -
Voter Preregistration Programs (Case Study of Hawaii and
Florida) 4.16.2021," and "HB 39 Research Document - Making Young
Voters The Impact of Preregistration on Youth Turnout
4.16.2021", from which he cited statistics.
1:43:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN introduced invited testimony.
1:44:22 PM
AMY GALLAWAY, Teacher, 2020 Teacher of the Year, testified
during the hearing on HB 39. She read from a prepared letter
[included in the committee packet], entitled "HB 39 Supporting
Document - Letters Received as of 4.11.2021," which read as
follows [original punctuation provided]:
To: Representative Claman, Representative Snyder, and
Committee Members
My name is Amy Gallaway. I am a high school civics and
CTE teacher in the Fairbanks Northstar Borough and the
2020 Alaska Teacher of the year. I am writing in
support of HB39 "Voter Registration Ag. As citizen
legislators, you are acutely aware of the necessity of
having an informed electorate that is representative
of the entirety of the state and not just certain
demographics. Allowing non-partisan early voter
registration at 16 will empower students to more
engaged citizens by demystifying the election process
and making the registration process more relevant for
more students. Academic studies from NCSL and
electoral analyses show that voting behavior is habit-
forming. It's important to engage prospective voters
early on to create a habit of voting and civic
engagement. After 22 years of teaching civics, I can
unequivocally state the research is spot on. My
students who vote in their first election at 18 or 19
continue to vote throughout their lives whereas my
students who did not, are still trying to figure out 5
years later. Most interestingly, I find that my
students who are able to register and vote while still
in high school are more engaged in our local and state
elections instead of only every 4 years for president.
Registration is a critical step to protecting the
integrity of our elections, but it shouldn't be a
barrier. While some say it is "easy", I can tell you
from experience students find voter registration HARD
and most parents don teach it. Many parents do not
vote, especially in local elections, so the education
students get about registration and the electoral
process comes almost entirely from the school
curriculum. Schools are the perfect place to teach how
to register to vote because we are already teaching
the power and necessity of the vote. By lowering the
registration age, teachers can provide the option for
all students to register to vote alongside their
civics lessons and preregistration drives can be
designed to operate on an ongoing basis, even when
there is no scheduled election, making learning
relevant and empowering students. At West Valley High
School, we hold an annual student-run local government
candidate forum. It is usually school board or State
House races. As a culminating activity, we then hold a
schoolwide Kids Voting election. Many students find
the election childish since it "doesn't count", even
though it is important to teach the process of getting
informed, election districts, and how to interact with
the ballot. During this time we hold voter
registration drives, but often only a handful of
students qualify. With HB39 as law, more students each
year could register and feel firsthand the importance
of engaging the democratic process.
We need to increase youth voter turnout so the
electorate represents all sectors of society better.
Average voter turnout in annual municipal elections
hovers between 15-21% and for state elections between
44-48%. In the 2018 election, only 6% of 18-24 year-
olds voted. This is not just disheartening, it is
unhealthy. Every year I ask students why they think
people don't vote. They say, "One vote doesn't really
matter, people don't care, and it is HARD to vote".
Last year while teaching a lesson on public policy and
voter turnout, I had a group of students goofing off.
They were talking about the basketball game, their
jobs, Snapchat, but definitely not voter turnout. I
asked them, "Since young people vote in such low
numbers, should the voting age be increased to
thirty?" I thought this would outrage them. To my
surprise, at least 15 students said, "Sure, it doesn't
really matter anyway." Four students even offered to
give up their vote altogether; they decided only the
people who care should vote. This is the reality in
most classrooms in Alaska. By allowing 16-year-olds to
register to vote, educators can lower one barrier- how
to register. Then use it alongside effective civics
programs like Kids Voting, We the People, and iCivics.
If we want to make elections fully representative, we
need to make the distribution of voting costs and
benefits independent of party lines. Simplified voter
registration does that. 14 states, including Florida,
Louisiana, Hawaii, and Oregon permit preregistration
beginning at 16 years old. Alaska should be number 15
so our students can help save the republic.
1:49:53 PM
ALEX KOPLIN, Member, Kenai Peninsula Votes, testified in support
of HB 39. He explained that the organization which he
represents is a non-partisan group of citizens who promote voter
education and voting. He suggested that the passage of HB 39
would result in voters being able to register between the ages
of 16 and 17 and would increase voter participation. He stated
his understanding that 14 states and Washington, D.C. permit
preregistration for voters who are 16 years of age [or older],
and more states allow preregistration for voters who are 17
years of age [or older]. He opined that preregistration of
voters would allow education in civics. He stated that, during
his time as a high school teacher, he encouraged his students to
complete a voter registration form, regardless of their age. He
stated that, in some states, individuals as young as 16 years of
age may vote in certain elections. He suggested that the
passage of HB 39 would strengthen civics education. He urged
bipartisan support for HB 39.
1:52:29 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN informed the committee that staff from the Division
of Elections, Department of Law, and Department of Health and
Social Services were available to answer questions.
1:52:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA shared with the committee concerns
expressed to his office by constituents that this bill would be
a precursor to lowering the voting age. He expressed his
support for voter education.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS stated that it was not the intent to
lower the voting age and offered his understanding that the
federal voting age remains at 18.
1:54:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA recalled his experience of his parents
having brought him into the voting booth as part of his civics
education. He asked what need exists to allow voters to
preregister and engage in the process [prior to age 18].
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS recalled prior testimony that, when
students are engaged in the public process, the education on
civics becomes relevant to students beyond memorization. He
suggested that [the lack of early registration] may not
constitute a need; however, it would provide a tool and
incentive to generate interest among students.
1:57:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA stated his understanding that a voter may
preregister at age 17. He referred to subsection (c), on lines
13-15:
"When a person has preregistered to vote under (b) of
this section, the division shall, 90 days before the
person reaches 18 years of age, register the person to
vote and forward to the person an acknowledgment in
the form of a registration card."
He asked whether this would allow individuals to be eligible to
vote sooner.
1:58:24 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS answered that HB 39 would allow for an
individual to preregister and would not change [when an
individual is eligible to vote]. He invited staff from the
Department of Law to weigh in on .the question.
1:59:26 PM
THOMAS FLYNN, Assistant Attorney General, Labor and State
Affairs Section, Civil Division (Anchorage), Department of Law,
answered that AS 15.07.040 allows voters to register 90 days
preceding their eighteenth birthday and that HB 39 would align
preregistration with existing statute.
1:59:50 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN provided an example in which an individual
preregistered on his/her seventeenth birthday, then on the
ninetieth day before his/her eighteenth birthday, registration
would be automatic.
MR. FLYNN agreed with the example provided by Chair Claman and
referred the question to Division of Elections staff.
2:00:22 PM
CAROL THOMPSON, Operations Manager, Division of Elections,
Office of the Lieutenant Governor, answered that a person may
register to vote 90 days prior to his/her eighteenth birthday.
She stated that, should HB 39 pass, an individual would then be
able to preregister to vote at age 16 and would be registered to
vote 90 days prior to his/her eighteenth birthday. She added
that existing statute and the Alaska State Constitution specify
that a person cannot vote until eighteen years of age. She
further explained that the 90-day advance registration allowed
an individual to register to vote when he/she turns eighteen
immediately prior to an election.
2:01:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA asked whether an individual who is
registered to vote prior to his/her eighteenth birthday may vote
before age 18.
2:01:46 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN asked whether, if election day is on November
first, and an individual registers on October first, and his/her
[eighteenth] birthday is December first, that individual would
be permitted to vote on November first.
MS. THOMPSON answered no; due to an internal tracking on voter
registration rolls, an individual's name will not appear on the
register at a precinct until he/she is eligible to vote.
2:02:44 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA expressed his concern regarding adding
preregistration as a third category in addition to the 90-day
preregistration [that exists] and asked whether an individual
who is registered to vote but not age eighteen prior to an
election would be allowed to vote.
MS. THOMPSON answered that, currently, when an individual
preregisters 90 days prior to his/her eighteenth birthday, the
individual appears registered within the system but not
published on precinct registers at the polls and would be
required to vote on a question ballot. She added that [his/her
ballot] would be denied if the individual was not eighteen on or
before election day.
2:05:07 PM
MR. FLYNN offered that the proposed bill would create a third
category of which there already exist the two: registered and
eligible to vote and preregistered and automatically registered
to vote 90 days prior to election day. The bill would add a
category of those who are preregistered [but not automatically
registered until 90 days prior to an election].
2:05:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURKA asked whether an extension of the 90-day
period [back] to age 16 could be a streamlined approach.
2:06:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS allowed that an extension of the 90-day
preregistration deadline could be a solution and welcomed
further discussion.
2:06:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked, under current statute, when an
individual 17 years of age, who preregisters to vote, would
receive his/her voter registration card.
2:07:04 PM
MS. THOMPSON answered that voter cards are mailed within 2 - 4
weeks of receipt of application.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked, should HB 39 pass, when that
individual would receive his/her voter registration card.
MS. THOMPSON anticipated that the process would not change; as
soon as the 90-day advance deadline was reached, cards would be
mailed.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether Ms. Thompson had
encountered a voter who had mistaken his/her voter registration
card as [proof of] eligibility to vote.
MS. THOMPSON answered that occasionally an underage voter will
attempt to vote on a question ballot, and the ballot is rejected
and the voter notified. She added that she could not answer
whether it was due to the underage voter having a registration
card.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked if an individual was voting for a
presidential election only, might a voter be allowed to vote
according to federal regulations with a valid voter
identification card [when the voter is ineligible].
MS. THOMPSON answered that, even for a federal-only election, a
person would still be required to be eighteen years of age in
order to vote. She further added that, if they attempted to
vote at another precinct on an absentee ballot, the ballot would
be reviewed and if, after review, it was determined that the
voter was not at least eighteen, then the ballot would be
rejected.
2:09:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether there might be benefit in
tying the registering for the [U.S. Selective Service System] to
the registration to vote.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS suggested that it would likely be a
federal matter and suggested that the Department of Military &
Veterans' Affairs may be able to answer questions regarding the
[U.S. Selective Services System] early registration.
2:11:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN questioned whether preregistration as
early as 16 would be so far in advance [of eligibility to vote]
that the preregistered voter may not remember when he/she is
eligible to vote.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS recommended the question be answered by
Ms. Galloway.
2:12:30 PM
MS. GALLOWAY suggested that although individuals may be eligible
to register at age 16, not all students would choose to do so.
She suggested that it would be at the option of the voter and
would enable students to choose to participate during their
[civics] educational experience. She opined that many students
would likely choose to register at age 17 or closer to their
eighteenth birthday, in advance of an upcoming election.
2:13:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND referred to the State of Alaska Voter
Registration Application [included in the committee packet] and
a screenshot of the Division of Elections webpage showing "Who
Can Register and Who Can Vote," and she asked for confirmation
that a voter who registers on the ninetieth day in advance of
his/her eighteenth birthday would receive a voter registration
card within 3 to 4 weeks and, if eighteen at the time of
election, would be eligible to vote.
MS. THOMPSON confirmed this as correct.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked if the card is valid when issued
if election day is after the voter turns 18 years old.
MS. THOMPSON confirmed this as correct.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked for confirmation of her
understanding that, should HB 39 pass, a voter may register at
age 16 and the Division of Elections would issue a voter
registration card 90 days in advance of the voter's eighteenth
birthday without additional action by the voter.
MS. THOMPSON stated her understanding to be the same.
2:17:36 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked whether the voter registration
offered during the permanent fund dividend (PFD) application
process indicates the existence of the 90-day [time period]
prior to an applicant's eighteenth birthday.
MS. THOMPSON deferred the question to be answered by Mr. Flynn.
2:18:27 PM
MR. FLYNN answered that AS 43.23.015 indicates that applicants
are required to be eligible to vote and would only then be
automatically registered to vote.
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND indicated that could be problematic.
2:19:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether information held on
[minors] would be held separately from adult information to
safeguard against [any data breach].
2:20:18 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS expressed that he would be open to the
possibility of an amendment to include additional safeguards on
minors' data as well as Representative Kurka's earlier concern
of maintaining a separate list of individuals who have
registered within 90 days prior to their eighteenth birthdays.
2:20:59 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked, should HB 39 pass, how long
information is retained on individuals who register at age 16 to
vote and subsequently leaves the state.
MS. THOMPSON stated that had not been taken into consideration
in analyzing the proposed bill. She explained that, should an
individual become registered and not vote or have any contact
with the division, the registration maintenance logs procedures
would apply.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN stated that the permanent fund dividend
application contains a question as to whether an applicant is
registered to vote in another state. He expressed his concern
that, should HB 39 pass, a sixteen-year-old, who preregistered
to vote and subsequently left the state and registered in
another state, would be registered to vote in two states, which
could create an issue for the voter.
2:23:55 PM
MS. THOMPSON expressed her hesitancy to answer the question, but
offered that, should the division receive notification from
another state that an individual had registered in that other
state, the division would cancel that voter's registration. She
further added that voter registration could be cancelled if the
division was contacted by the voter and finally, the division
conducts yearly voter registration list maintenance. She
further referred the question to the Department of Law.
2:24:49 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN suggested that the scenario described by
Representative Eastman could exist for a voter of any age.
2:25:07 PM
MR. FLYNN stated his agreement with Chair Claman's suggestion
that the potential issues described could exist for a voter of
any age. He added that preregistration is not automatic.
2:25:27 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN opened public testimony on HB39 and ascertained
that there was no one who wished to testify, and closed public
testimony.
2:26:07 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN asked Ms. Galloway whether she encourages her
students in the classroom to register to vote when they become
eligible 90 days prior to their eighteenth birthdays. He asked
how the passage of HB 39 might change how students are engaged
to register to vote.
MR. GALLOWAY answered that each classroom is different, and
schools may conduct voter registration drives close to
graduation or close to upcoming elections. She explained that,
in her classroom, she monitors each student's birthday and
offers a voter registration form to a student who is turning 18
as a birthday present. She added that, in her school, there
exist teachers who are registrars and provide additional support
to students. She suggested that the passage of HB 39 would
result in more students preregistering.
2:28:41 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN shared his experience while speaking to students in
classrooms and suggested that, should HB 39 pass, elected
officials could encourage students to vote.
2:29:14 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referred to the fiscal note [included in
the committee packet], entitled "HB39-OOG-DOE-4-14-21" and
suggested that the analysis contained in the fiscal note
warranted scrutiny. She asked, if HB 39 had been enacted prior
to the data breach that occurred [with the Division of
Elections] prior to the last election, what liability would the
state be subject to should minors' [protected] data have been
breached.
MR. FLYNN stated that he could not answer what liabilities may
exist for the state had HB 39 passed. He stated that minors'
voter registration data would be included in voter registration
rolls. Alaska currently does not have specific protections on
data associated with minors; all data is protected under public
records statutes. He postulated that other states which have
preregistration for minors may have additional protections
pertaining specifically to minors' data.
2:31:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE referred to the fiscal note analysis which
read: "...regulations would be necessary to clarify how the
division will store this data and what parts will be made
available to the public as well as how individuals (or their
legal guardians) would interact with the division in the
maintenance of the data." She asked what protections currently
exist in statute pertaining to minors' information.
MR. FLYNN expressed that he is not aware of any individual
protections that exist specific to data of minors.
2:31:58 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN asked whether Representative Vance was inquiring on
protections that may exist on minors' voter registration data
that may exist in the 90 days prior to their eighteenth
birthdays or data of minors in general.
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE specified her inquiry pertained to the
protection of data of minors in general.
CHAIR CLAMAN asked whether Mr. Flynn's previous answer pertained
to protections that may exist on minors' voter registration data
or data of minors in general.
MR. FLYNN answered that he had spoken to the protection of data
of minors in general.
CHAIR CLAMAN suggested that some of the discussion taking place
pertained to voter registration in general and may be going
beyond the scope of HB 39.
2:32:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN referred to line 9 and postulated that
the language would not allow for a minor to preregister via the
PFD application process and asked for conversation with the
bill's sponsor regarding an instance where a parent would
preregister his/her child to vote via that process.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS asked whether Representative Eastman's
question was whether or not to include preregistration as part
of the PFD application process.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked for conversation on whether to
include preregistration as part of the PFD application process
of a parent on behalf of a minor.
REPRESENTATIVE HOPKINS answered that one of the purposes of the
proposed legislation would be to encourage students' engagement
in their civics education. He opined that automatic voter
preregistration through the PFD application process would not
work toward that purpose.
2:34:51 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that HB 39 was held over.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Violent Crimes Compensation Board Appointment - Greg Bringhurst Resume 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Violent Crimes Compensation Board Appointment - Anne Helzer Application 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Violent Crimes Compensation Board Appointment - Robert Urata Application 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
|
| Violent Crimes Compensation Board Appointment - Robert Urata Resume 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
|
| HB 39 v. A 2.18.2021.PDF |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Sponsor Statement v. A 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Sectional Analysis v. A 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Supporting Document - Data Excerpts 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Supporting Document - Letters Received as of 4.11.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Research Document - Increasing Youth Participation The Case for a National Voter Pre-Registration Law 2012 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Research Document - Voter Preregistration Programs (Case Study of Hawaii and Florida) 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Research Document - Making Young Voters The Impact of Preregistration on Youth Turnout 4.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 39 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE 4.14.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/21/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 39 |
| HB 116 v. A 2.24.2021.PDF |
HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Sponsor Statement v. A 4.12.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Sectional Analysis v. A 4.12.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Supporting Document - FAQs 4.12.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Supporting Document - Carey Acquittal 2017 4.12.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Supporting Document - Temporary Secure Juvenile Holding Areas 4.12.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Supporting Document - DJJ Letter 4.9.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 116 Additional Document - DHSS Comparison Memo for HB 116 and HB 105 (SB 91) 4.14.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 HB 116 SB 91 |
| HB 116 Additional Document - DHSS Comparison of HB 116 and HB 105 (SB 91) with Notes 4.14.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/27/2021 3:00:00 PM HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 105 HB 116 SB 91 |
| HB 116 Fiscal Note DHSS-PS 4.9.2021.pdf |
HHSS 4/29/2021 3:00:00 PM HJUD 4/12/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/14/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 116 |
| HB 29 v. A 2.18.2021.PDF |
HJUD 3/22/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Sponsor Statement 3.22.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/22/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Supporting Document - Electric Utility Liability Information 3.22.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/22/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Supporting Document - APA Letter 3.1.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/22/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Supporting Document - CVEA Letter 3.9.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/22/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Supporting Document - GVEA Letter 3.16.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/22/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Supporting Document - CVEA Vegetation Management Draft March 2021 3.22.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/22/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Additional Document - Anchorage Daily News Article (Distributed by HJUD Committee) 3.28.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Opposing Document - Testimony Received by 3.29.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Additional Document - Communications with American Property Casualty Insurance Association (Distributed by HJUD Committee) 4.7.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Additional Document - HB 66 Utah Wildland Fire Planning and Cost Recovery Amendments (Distributed by HJUD Committee) 4.7.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Additional Document - APCIA and NAMIC Joint Letter to HJUD 4.9.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Additional Document - APCIA and NAMIC Draft Amendment to HB 29 (Distributed by the HJUD Committee) 4.9.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/9/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB 29 Additional Document - APA Response to APCIA and NAMIC Joint Letter to HJUD 4.12.2021.pdf |
HJUD 4/16/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 29 |