Legislature(2005 - 2006)BUTROVICH 205
02/06/2006 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB166 | |
| HB37 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 166 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 37 | TELECONFERENCED | |
CSHB 37(FIN)am-PUBLIC ACCESS TO FISHING STREAMS
CHAIR THOMAS WAGONER announced CSHB 37(FIN) am to be up for
consideration.
REPRESENTATIVE LES GARA, sponsor of HB 37, explained that it
creates a process for Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G)
to identify areas of high-use for fisheries in streams that
might lose their public access in the future especially the
fisheries located along the road system and to land-trade or buy
easements and other public access along those areas. A lot of
states have lost their public access and it's now too expensive
for them to get it back.
4:25:17 PM
SENATOR STEDMAN said it seemed like the definition of "fishing
waterways" could be virtually any waterway with fish in it and
asked if that was correct.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA replied that it could be, but the bill asks
the department to prioritize those areas with the greatest
public fishery and recreational value. It asks the commissioner
to come up with about two meander miles of land statewide that
it would, then, consider ways to purchase or land trade for
public access to in the future. These areas would not be
appealable by members of the public, so people wouldn't be able
to argue about what land should have been identified.
4:26:16 PM
SENATOR STEDMAN, referred to language on page 3, line 10, that
says, "Before February 1 of each year the commissioner shall
submit a plan to acquire public access to fishing waterways...."
It looks like he could basically blanket a substantial amount of
private land within the state of Alaska, particularly in
Southeast where, "Virtually every creek has a fish in it."
4:27:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GARA clarified that the commissioner is supposed
to prioritize two-miles worth of the highest-value public access
areas. He said this bill doesn't use eminent domain; but
requires voluntary land trades with landowners or voluntary land
purchases. He couldn't think of very many areas in Southeast
that were crying for this solution, but he knew of some in
Southcentral and the Interior.
SENATOR STEDMAN said the navigable waters definition is far-
reaching and asked if two miles beyond the meander line of the
river is the targeted distance.
REPRESENTATIVE GARA reiterated the he is asking ADF&G to
prioritize the most valuable, in terms of needed sport and
subsistence fishing access, two miles of river that they can
find. It could be five different parcels or one long parcel.
CHAIR WAGONER held CSHB 37(FIN) am until Monday and adjourned
the meeting at 4:34:59 PM.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|