Legislature(2019 - 2020)CAPITOL 106
03/26/2019 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB22 | |
| HB29 | |
| HB97 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | HB 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 86 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 29-INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR TELEHEALTH
3:57:51 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY announced that the next order of business
would be HOUSE BILL NO. 29, "An Act relating to insurance
coverage for benefits provided through telehealth; and providing
for an effective date."
3:58:30 PM
The committee took an at-ease from 3:58 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
4:00:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ introduced HB 29 as the sponsor of the
bill, stating that this bill increased access to and reduced the
cost of health care by requiring insurers to reimburse providers
for delivering health care services via telehealth. She added
that telehealth was already covered and provided for by Medicaid
and the Indian Health Services. She pointed out that it was so
effective in these markets that it should be covered in its
entirety in the private market as it increased access to health
care in Rural Alaska. She shared a PowerPoint titled "House
Bill 29 Insurance Coverage for Telehealth." She directed
attention to slide 2, "Telehealth: Why is this important?" and
pointed out that it would reduce the cost of health care by
reducing travel expenses. She said that it could be used for
primary, specialty, and behavioral health care. She noted that
this also supported necessary innovations and transformations in
health care. She pointed out that this could reduce emergency
room visits. She added that the state plan did not provide for
tele-health.
4:03:37 PM
BERNICE NISBETT, Staff, Representative Ivy Spohnholz,
paraphrased from the Sectional Analysis to HB 29 [Included in
members' packets], which read:
Section 1.
AS 21.42.422 has been amended to require insurance
coverage for health benefits provided through
telehealth technology.
Section 2.
AS 21.42.422 is a new subsection that defines health
care insurer as a person transacting the business of
health care insurance except for a nonfederal
governmental plan. It also adds the definition of
telehealth under 47.05.270(e) as the practice of
health care delivery, evaluation, diagnosis,
consultation, or treatment, using the transfer of
health care data through audio, visual, or data
communications, performed over two or more locations
between providers who are physically separated from
the recipient or from each other or between a provider
and a recipient who are physically separated from each
other.
Section 3
The changes to Section 1 of this bill applies to
health care insurance plans that are offered, issued,
delivered, or renewed on or after the effective date.
Section 4
The effective date is July 1, 2020.
4:05:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked if Department of Commerce, Community
& Economic Development and the administration were in support of
the proposed bill.
4:05:43 PM
LORI WING-HEIER, Director, Juneau Office, Division of Insurance,
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, in
response to Representative Claman, said that Department of
Commerce, Community & Economic Development was very much in
support of anything that would provide access to health care yet
lower the cost at the same time. She acknowledged that the
department was in support of the proposed bill.
4:06:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked if it was possible to mandate this.
MS. WING-HEIER reported that the Division of Insurance estimated
that insured plans, which the division regulated, covered about
15 percent of Alaskans.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked why there was a need to mandate this
to the insurance companies, as it offered a cost savings.
MS. WING-HEIER replied that this would increase access to Rural
Alaska, especially for specialties and would reduce the overall
costs if it could address common things and eliminate the need
to visit the provider. She reported that there were data
projections for virtual hospitals in the future with
recuperation at home, although there were not any numbers to
support this. In response to the need for a mandate, she
reported that any conversation for new services prompted
discussions and sometimes it was necessary to push for the
offering of newer products or services.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked about the options. He acknowledged
that, although Moda Health had submitted a letter of support,
they would not be required to provide this with their plan for
the state. He questioned whether there would be support from
the providers who would be required to offer telehealth. He
shared his difficulty for understanding why a cost saving
measure would need to be mandated.
MS. WING-HEIER explained that previous attempts to deliver
telehealth had not been provided by all insurance providers and
that this mandate would ensure parity.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked how to prevent individuals from
recruiting the use of telehealth services without allowing for
the best interests of the patient. He opined that the
introduction of money through a mandate brought with it those
who would take advantage.
4:10:51 PM
MS. WING-HEIER expressed agreement that there were bad actors
making "big dollars out of it" and this included doctors and
insurance agents. She stated that it was necessary to use due
diligence and take the necessary actions against those bad
players.
REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked how to ensure that her division had
the tools to "take action as needed if there are those bad
players that come up." He asked if it would be necessary for
statute changes to allow the authority to pursue these people,
some of whom may not even be in the state.
MS. WING-HEIER reported that the agency had four investigators
and she declared they were "a critical part of us being able to
look at people that are the bad actors in the state. When they
cross state lines, we end up working with the U.S. Attorney
General or with the FBI, and that's not uncommon." She declared
that these federal agencies "actually have the jurisdiction."
4:13:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON asked if this would cover all Alaskans or
just those through certain health care facilities or certain
insurance companies.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ replied that the intent of the proposed
bill was to ensure that insurers operating in the private market
be required to cover telehealth services. She reported that
telehealth services were already authorized and paid for under
Medicaid, as well as tribal health. This proposed bill would
expand the market for access to telehealth into the private
market. She stated that self-insured plans which were governed
by federal law, including the insurance plan by the State of
Alaska, could not be included in state law.
MS. WING-HEIER said that the State of Alaska had adopted a tele-
doc option in its retirement and benefit plan.
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON declared that this was beneficial and
saved a lot of time, travel, and money. She asked that this be
shared with our federal delegation.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ expressed her intention to coordinate
with the federal delegation. She expressed agreement that the
state plan now allowed tele-doc, which she described as "a
virtual form of an urgent care," although this was not quite the
complete service that she supported for lasting relationships.
4:17:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN asked about the tele-doc coverage.
REPRESENTATIVE SPOHNHOLZ, in response, explained that it
depended on the provider. She said that Aetna had a requirement
that providers go through a process to determine participation
in telehealth.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN said that it was available if they
followed the steps. He noted that there was a zero fiscal note
and asked if there would be additional costs due to enforcement
authority.
MS. WING-HEIER replied that it was not expected to change the
workload.
4:19:54 PM
VICTORIA KNAPP, Chief Operations Officer, Mat-Su Health
Services, Inc., stated that they relied on telehealth to provide
specialty psychiatric services for individuals with mental
health issues. She noted that there were "huge shortages of
psychiatric providers in the State of Alaska." She reported
that they had providers both in-state and out-of-state who were
licensed in the State of Alaska. She declared that they were a
safety net provider and had gone to telehealth services several
years prior due to a shortage of available in-person psychiatric
providers. She added that, as they did not want to have a wait
list for psychiatric services, they moved to telehealth
services. She noted that, on those occasions when a private
health plan did not cover these services, the patient had to
decide whether to make out of pocket payment or not receive the
services. She expressed a desire for everyone to be covered for
telehealth.
4:21:54 PM
AROM EVANS, MD, Orion Behavioral Health Network, said that his
organization primarily provided services for children and
adolescents. He said there was a need for medical service
providers for children, and that many of them were out of state
and could only be accessed through telehealth. He stated his
support for HB 29. He said that tele-doc was an important and
useful service but that it was a very different service than
telehealth. With tele-doc, as it was an on-demand service and
you could not schedule a follow-up appointment, you may not have
the same provider.
4:23:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE TARR asked whether, since with telehealth there
were no in-person meetings, there was a potential to not build a
strong relationship that would make the care as effective.
DR. EVANS said they used a hybrid model as they maintained four
physical clinics around the state. He acknowledged that many
patients and family members needed that reassurance and they
treated this on a case by case basis.
4:26:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON asked about genetic work-ups through
telehealth.
DR. EVANS explained that genetic work-ups were conducted
primarily in the laboratory, as they reviewed symptoms to
determine the necessary tests, and these work-ups included a
physical exam that could be provided by a local doctor.
4:27:09 PM
ROBERT BARATTA, National Consultant, Teladoc Health, referenced
the earlier discussion for fraud and abuse, and pointed out that
prior to access of the service, there had to be a valid
physician - patient relationship established. He pointed out
that Alaska had such a statute as well as guidelines from the
State Board of Medicine, for the way this relationship must be
established. For reimbursement, the service had to be provided
in accordance with that valid relationship. He pointed out that
most insurance plans had the authority to make sure that it was
medically necessary.
REPRESENTATIVE JACKSON asked about the difference between
charges from a tele-doc and an office visit.
MR. BARATTA explained that there was a tele-medicine platform
which a patient could access through their computer for a
virtual visit with a physician. He said it mimicked the
experience of a visit to an Urgent Care center with a board
certified and Alaska licensed physician.
4:30:02 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY opened public testimony.
4:30:24 PM
CYNTHIA MARK, Teladoc Health, emphasized that it was possible to
establish an on-going relationship with an Alaska provider
through telehealth and to see that same provider on an on-going
basis. She stated support for HB 29, pointing out that it was
good policy and good legislation.
4:32:02 PM
CHRISTOPHER DIETRICH, Assistant Medical Director, Orion
Behavioral Health Network, stated his support for HB 29. He
offered an example of a patient released from API (Alaska
Psychiatric Institute) who moved to Rural Alaska, and the option
for telehealth.
4:33:44 PM
CO-CHAIR ZULKOSKY closed public testimony.
[HB 29 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB022 Supporting Document-Letter of Support from American Foundation for Suicide Prevention - Alaska Chapter 03.07.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB022 Supporting Document-Letter of Support from Suicide Prevention Council 2.25.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB022 Fiscal Note DHSS-SPC-3.22.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB022 Supporting Document-Letter of Support from NAMI Alaska 3.6.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB022 Sponsor Statement 03.15.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB022 Supporting Document Legislative Audit of Suicide Prevention Council 3.6.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB029 Sectional Analysis ver A 2.25.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB029 Sponsor Statement 2.25.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB029 Supporting Document-Letter of Support 2.25.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB029 Fiscal Note DCCED-DOI 3.22.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB029 Letter of Support Moda Health 03.25.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM SHSS 2/19/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB029 Presentation 03.25.2019.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM SHSS 2/14/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 29 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document AK State Medical Bd Roster.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document AAPA general overview.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document AK State Medical Bd PA scope of practice.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document DEA Drug Schedules.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document HRSA -HPSA Underserved Primary Care Areas.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document Medically Underserved Areas HRSA.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document PA guidelines AK State Medical Bd.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Supporting Document PA Prescriptive Authority (AAC).pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB097 Draft Proposed Blank CS ver M 3.21.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB097 Fiscal Note DCCED-CBPL-3.22.19.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB097 Supporting Document Letters of Support for companion legislation SB44.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM HL&C 4/15/2019 3:15:00 PM SFIN 4/9/2019 9:00:00 AM |
HB 97 SB 44 |
| HB0097 Sectional.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 97 |
| HB0097 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HHSS 3/26/2019 3:00:00 PM HHSS 3/28/2019 3:00:00 PM |
HB 97 |