Legislature(1997 - 1998)
03/26/1997 03:40 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 26 BIG GAME TAGS FOR WOLVES
CHAIRMAN HALFORD announced HB 26 to be up for consideration.
MR. DAVID STANCLIFF, Staff to Representative Ogan, sponsor, said HB
26 was introduced to find a point at which ADF&G can raise revenues
from the sale of wolf tags. Presently there are over 10,000 non-
residents who hunt in the State and only 3% are purchasing tags and
the feeling was that the tag price was a bit high considering how
difficult it is to find a wolf. The bill also provides that in
areas requiring intensive management no tags would be required.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked if the wolf was considered a big game animal.
MR. STANCLIFF replied yes. She asked if this bill only referred to
shooting, not trapping. MR. STANCLIFF replied yes. SENATOR
LINCOLN asked if a person comes to Alaska to shoot a wolf, are they
required to have a guide. MR. STANCLIFF explained that in most
cases a non-resident will have a guide if they are hunting sheep or
bear. It is possible in some areas of the State to hunt caribou
and moose without a guide, but in no case is it possible to take a
wolf without proper sealing. They do not need a guide specifically
for a wolf.
SENATOR LINCOLN asked how a non-resident, unfamiliar with the land,
would hunt for these wolves unguided. MR. STANCLIFF answered that
it is presumed that most wolf tags are purchased incidentally to
other big game tags. So it is hard to determine how many people
come to the State specifically for a wolf.
SENATOR LINCOLN said she knows cases where dogs have been shot
because someone thought it was a wolf. She asked if they are just
trying to raise more revenue with this bill. CHAIRMAN HALFORD said
he was unsure what she was asking and added that existing law is
not changed in this bill. Existing law only requires a guide for
a non-resident for sheep and bear. He thought reducing the tag fee
might encourage the incidental take by both residents and non-
residents, guided or not.
MR. KEN TAYLOR, Deputy Director, Wildlife Conservation, said they
view this as a revenue neutral bill and said they are not in the
business of raising money for the department. They are in the
business of providing as much opportunity as possible to the
public. The wolf population in Alaska is 7,000 - 10,000 and our
annual harvest is roughly 1,000 - 1,200 depending on the snow
conditions in winter. The population is capable of sustaining a
higher harvest than that and they thought increased opportunity
could be addressed. He said that the price the legislature put on
the tags a few years ago was prohibitive for many hunters who came
up and lowering tag fees for this species wouldn't generate
additional revenue, but would provide additional opportunity.
MR. TAYLOR explained the way they view this working is that non-
resident hunters who do come up to hunt moose or caribou are
interested in hunting wolves while hunting the other species. He
said the department supported the bill as written.
SENATOR TAYLOR moved to pass HB 26 with individual recommendations.
There were no objections and it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|