Legislature(2013 - 2014)HOUSE FINANCE 519
02/12/2013 01:30 PM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB30 | |
| HB26 | |
| HB22 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 22 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 26 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 30 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HOUSE BILL NO. 26
"An Act extending the termination date of the Board of
Public Accountancy; and providing for an effective
date."
2:00:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER, SPONSOR, relayed that HB 26
extended the termination date for the Board of Public
Accountancy to June 30, 2021. He explained that the
legislature routinely designated sunset dates for boards
and commissions; prior to the sunset date the board or
commission was reviewed through the legislative budget and
audit process to ensure that its services continued to be
needed. The bill was supported by legislative audit work
conducted the prior summer; the auditor had determined that
the board's termination date should be extended to June 30,
2021; that it was operating in the public's interest; and
that it had exercised appropriate regulatory oversight of
public accountants. He communicated that the audit
expressed one concern related to the overall operations of
the case management system of the Division of Corporations,
Business, and Professional Licensing (CBPL). The fiscal
note would continue to fund the board at its current level
with receipt supported services. He explained that the
funds were taken from the regulated community for the
purpose of administrating its professional licensing board.
2:03:18 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze asked CBPL to provide detail on the
concerns from its perspective.
DON HABEGAR, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, BUSINESS,
AND PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, addressed the issue of
concern outlined in the audit. He explained that a new
database had been installed into investigations; the
database had some issues in the installation and conversion
process that had been caught by a 2011 special audit. The
division had addressed the issue by generating a task-force
including a database specialist and the division's own
investigators and information technology staff. The task-
force had come out with a number of recommendations to fix
the issues. He elaborated that CBPL had asked the
legislature for a special appropriation to pay for incurred
costs related to the task-force. The division was currently
implementing the fixes; the software writing was
anticipated to be completed in draft form by April 1, 2013.
The division would have 60-plus days of testing to ensure
that the system was working correctly and the final fixes
were scheduled for completion by the end of June 2013.
2:06:08 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze discussed that most boards were self-
supporting, self-assessed, and that legislative affirmed
board members set policies. He referred to discussions that
the professional wishes had been side tracked related to
the use of funds. He asked for clarification on the issue.
Mr. Habegar had heard from the boards that they wanted the
increased ability to travel to out-of-state meetings. He
shared that AS Title 8 included approximately 40
professional licensing programs; 20 of the programs had
boards and 20 had department oversight. The boards
generally belonged to national professional associations
that helped to steer the profession in various states. The
Alaska boards liked to be part of the discussions, given
that national associations set policies that had national
and state impacts. The division had approximately $400,000
in travel authority in FY 13 (the governor's proposed FY 13
request had been $550,000). He had devised a system that
included travel to all in-state meetings, which were
statutorily required. He had carved out a portion of the
funds for administrative purposes (e.g. his travel to
Anchorage to "steer" staff). He communicated that out-of-
state travel was parceled out of remaining funds.
2:08:34 PM
Representative Costello asked whether the division planned
to provide licensees with online visibility in regards to
how their fees were spent. She supported the idea.
Mr. Habegar answered that the division had been working on
bringing its accounts up to speed; it had conducted a 10-
year review of all the boards' revenue and expense reports
and had reconciled the reports to the state accounting
system. He furthered that quarterly reports were reconciled
to the state accounting system and were provided to the
boards. He believed putting the reports online was a good
suggestion and the division would take it into
consideration.
REPRESENTATIVE STEVE THOMPSON, SPONSOR pointed to a
reconciliation showing excess funds carried forward by the
Board of Accountancy, which showed $147,000 accumulated in
its account. He observed that the board's request to send
two CPAs to the national conference had been denied because
it had not fit in the budget; however, there was $147,000
in the board's account. He asked if there should be two
line items in the budget for department travel and for pre-
paid professional board travel. He thought the distinction
may prevent the misconception that general funds were being
saved when the travel budget was cut. He discussed that
other boards had used state travel funds for national
conferences; subsequently, the funds were reimbursed, but
instead of going back into the board's travel account, the
funds were deposited into the state's general fund. He was
concerned that the issue was creating a problem and
wondered about a solution.
2:11:41 PM
Mr. Habegar replied that he had spoken with all 20 boards
about the issue at some point in time. He felt that the
$400,000 provided by the legislature could not be overspent
even if the division collected other revenue sources. For
example, professionals paid licensing fees on a biennial
basis; two years of revenue was typically collected in
advance of two years of expenses; therefore, a program
could have a surplus at any one time. He expounded that
programs may have a carryover if expenses came in as less
than revenue; after analysis by the division, the carryover
may be used to reduce fees or to pay for additional
anticipated expenses (i.e. for a court case or other).
Mr. Habegar addressed the second part of Representative
Thompson's question related to third-party reimbursement
for travel. He relayed that state policy required the
division to show the costs on revenue expense reports. He
agreed that the incurred expenses records should be public;
therefore the division paid for the travel up front. He
confirmed that when third-parties (e.g. national
organizations) reimbursed for travel expenses the money was
deposited into the general fund.
2:14:36 PM
Representative Thompson found it hard to believe that board
members paying into a travel account were denied out-of-
state travel and that instead the division recommended
reducing fees when excess revenue accrued from licensing
fees. He saw confusion arising because licensees were not
able to use the money designated for travel. He asserted
that pre-paid professional travel fees should be separated
from the department's general fund expenditures.
Representative Hawker had met with members of the
Corporations Board who claimed that they had been granted
insufficient spending authority for the receipt supported
services (RSS) funds collected in aggregate for all of the
state's boards and commissions. The issue resulted in the
agency's need to ration the amount of RSS funds that were
collected from each of the boards. Additionally, boards or
commissions (paying their own way through RSS) were
prevented from accessing all of the money that was assessed
and taken by the state. He asserted that the practice was
"confiscation and impoundment" of money paid by self-
supporting organizations into the state's custody who
expected it to be available for the operation of their
boards and commissions. He agreed that the practice was
tantamount to theft if the agency did not have authority to
spend its money. He noted that the issue was scheduled to
be discussed in subcommittee. He emphasized that the funds
came from RSS and not the general fund.
Representative Hawker recommended that in the case of
third-party reimbursement for travel, the operating budget
language section should specify that an appropriation for
RSS includes the monetary appropriation and any
reimbursement of funds from national organizations. He
stressed that the solution was very simple. He asked the
committee to consider ensuring that the legislature
authorized the spending of all money taken from Alaska's
citizens and that the state was not stealing travel money
from the organizations.
2:19:18 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze believed the discussion point was
appropriate.
Representative Hawker noted that the conversation pertained
to an operation of the board of corporations and public
licensing; it had nothing to do with HB 26 and the
reauthorization of the Board of Accountancy.
Representative Gara asked for verification that the Board
of Accountancy's operations were paid for by membership
fees and not with general fund dollars. Mr. Habegar replied
in the affirmative.
Representative Gara asked if travel money had been held
back due to a dispute (within the profession) that more
money should be spent on investigation and less on travel.
Mr. Habegar answered in the negative. He furthered that
investigations were fully funded with fee supported
services. The issue pertained to travel authorization.
Representative Gara asked how long the proposed extension
was.
Co-Chair Stoltze responded that the audit recommendation
was for an eight-year extension.
Representative Gara read the last sentence of a one-page
Division of Legislative Audit document (copy on file): "The
noted deficiencies hamper the division's ability to provide
adequate investigative support to the board." He believed
the statement warranted concern. He wondered if the
deficiency should be fixed prior to granting the extension.
2:22:03 PM
Representative Hawker argued that waiting to grant the
extension would be "punishing the innocent and letting the
guilty go free." He stated that AS 08.03.020(c) allowed the
legislature to extend the board's termination date for up
to eight years. He accentuated that the problem noted in
the Division of Legislative Audit document had nothing to
do with the operation of the Board of Public Accountancy;
it had to do with a larger unsolved problem within CBPL. He
relayed that the time and work put into the sunset
authorizations by the legislative auditor was significant;
the authorizations additionally were expensive and required
substantial "man power" that took away from the division's
ability to pursue other requests (particularly special
audits requested by legislators). He believed the Board of
Public Accountancy had sufficiently demonstrated that it
merited the 8-year extension. He stated that the problem
identified lay with CBPL; a special audit related to the
problems had been released by the Legislative Budget and
Audit Committee on June 29, 2011. He acknowledged that CBPL
had been working diligently to resolve the issues. He
believed the division needed to be working with the
legislature to resolve the budget issues and to continue
work with legislative oversight to remedy its internal
operation problems.
2:25:15 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze remarked that the Professional Licensing
Board had done a good job making improvements over the past
several years. He added that in the past there had been
some "wild audit reports" that had been highly frustrating.
Vice-Chair Neuman asked whether there were any repetitive
issues brought to the Board of Public Accountancy by its
members. Mr. Habegar replied that there were issues, but
they were part of the normal course of business for a
professional board (e.g. granting licenses, determining
whether licensing violations had occurred, regulation of
the profession, and other); the board handled the issues on
a quarterly basis. He furthered that the board was busy
with routine business. He did not see any anomalies before
the board.
Co-Chair Stoltze OPENED public testimony.
JEFF JOHNSON, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT and CHAIR, STATE
BOARD of ACCOUNTANCY, FAIRBANKS (via teleconference),
appreciated the discussion. He had been on the board for
several years and had learned from other members that the
investigative process had been greatly improved in the past
couple of years. He believed the board was headed in the
right direction and mentioned the improved reporting system
that should be operational in the spring of 2013. He stated
that in the past there had been a problem with the
timeliness of investigations and protection of the public's
interest. He reiterated that the board felt it was headed
in the right direction.
2:28:40 PM
Co-Chair Stoltze asked if Mr. Johnson supported the
legislation. Mr. Johnson replied in the affirmative.
Co-Chair Stoltze CLOSED public testimony.
Representative Costello discussed the fiscal note from the
Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development
for receipt services in the annual amount of $161,700 for
FY 14 through FY 19 and one full-time position.
Vice-Chair Neuman MOVED to REPORT HB 26 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note.
Representative Gara OBJECTED for discussion. He made a
remark about an "attorney barb" and WITHDREW his OBJECTION.
Representative Hawker commented that he would come before
the committee during session with an Alaska Bar Association
reauthorization bill.
There being NO further OBJECTION, HB 26 was REPORTED out of
committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with one
previously published zero fiscal note: FN1 (CED).
2:31:11 PM
AT EASE
2:33:11 PM
RECONVENED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB22 Supporting Documents-Audit Summary.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB22 Supporting Documents-Audit 08-20076-13.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB 22 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB 26 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB26 Audit Report Digest.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB22 Supporting Documents.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 22 |
| HB26 Audit Public Accountantcy.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 26 |
| HB 30FN.3-Leg Audit-2-11-13.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| CSHB 30 Gara-1- Amendment.pdf |
HFIN 2/12/2013 1:30:00 PM |
HB 30 |