Legislature(1997 - 1998)
02/19/1997 01:40 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
1
HOUSE BILL 17
"An Act establishing the Department of Natural
Resources as the platting authority in certain areas of
the state; relating to subdivisions and dedications;
and providing for an effective date."
REPRESENTATIVE JEANNETTE JAMES noted that last year HB 17
was HB 80 which died in the rush of adjournment. She
commented that work on the legislation over the last several
years has molded the bill into one that has no opposition.
Representative James advised that the proposed legislation
is supported by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR),
surveyors and all impacted classes of people.
HB 17 would bring all of the unorganized boroughs under the
purview of DNR as pertaining to platting of real estate.
The bill would also clean up the definition problems by
defining the word "subdivision" so that all agencies use the
same terminology. The Department has specified a time frame
in which the plat must be approved or disapproved. If the
review is not completed in a timely manner, the plat would
be approved by default.
Representative James proceeded to address the changes made
to the original legislation in the committee substitute.
Representative Grussendorf asked if the boroughs and
municipalities had been contacted regarding impact of the
legislation. Representative James noted that the process
would not affect the boroughs or municipalities because they
already have their own rules. The only ones affected would
be the ones with no platting authority. The law would be
relative to a new borough or municipality and the language
of the bill would include University lands. She concluded,
the purpose of the legislation would be to meet State
requirements for monumentation, review and legal access.
Representative Foster asked how the legislation would affect
patented mining claims. Representative James understood
that if at this time they are doing it, they would not have
to provide legal access. Under the DNR purview and the
proposed legislation, legal access would be required. She
advised that the legislation would cover all lands where
there is no other platting authority.
PATRICK KALEN, PRESIDENT, AMERICAN CONGRESS ON SURVEYING AND
MAPPING (ACSM), FAIRBANKS, spoke in support of the proposed
legislation. The original bill appeared before the
Legislature in 1976. ACSM initially forbade the Department
from implementing engineering standards. He commended
Representative James for creating a "good" piece of
2
legislation and one which ACSM supports.
Representative Foster noted that the fiscal note indicates
that revenues raised would pay for the Lands Surveyor
Assistant II position. He voiced concern that living in an
unorganized borough, those funds would be going to the
General Fund. His fear was with future budget cuts, the
permitting process would be slowed down.
Mr. Kalen replied that a 45 day time limit for filing would
be installed. Co-Chair Therriault pointed out that Page #4,
Line #3, clarifies that language noting the 45 day filing
time limit and that, "the Commissioner 'shall' approve the
plat or return it".
Co-Chair Therriault asked the difference between last year's
fiscal note and the current one. Representative James
explained, last year's fiscal note had indicated $64
thousand dollars in receipts and expenses; the current
fiscal note requests $73.3 thousand dollars with a start-up
request of $21.3 thousand dollars.
CAROL CARROLL, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, added that the
difference between the two notes was directly related to
personal services and the funding of the Land Surveyor II
position. She was not aware of the position funding
requested last year. Representative James pointed out that
as the costs have risen, the permit fee was increased.
Representative G. Davis asked if the fee would be adjustable
depending on the actual costs. Representative James noted
that the fee would cover the expenses.
Representative J. Davies pointed out that the fees would be
received as General Fund receipts. If there were $70
thousand dollars General Fund receipts, under present budget
operations, a $70 thousand dollars would need to be cut
elsewhere in the budget. Representative James agreed,
although, countered that legal challenges addressing
subdivisions could "eat" that amount up quickly. She
believed that the legislation would provide a savings over
the long term.
Representative J. Davies commented for the record that this
type of receipt should be categorized as designated program
receipts so that no other service would be cut from another
program.
Representative Martin MOVED to report CS HB 17 (RES) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
3
so ordered.
CS HB 17 (RES) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with a fiscal note by the
Department of Natural Resources dated 1/31/97.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|