Legislature(2011 - 2012)SENATE FINANCE 532
04/01/2011 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB16 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 94 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 16 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 16
"An Act extending senior benefits."
9:04:21 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman proposed committee substitute, work draft
27-LS0135/D. Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED for purpose of
discussion.
DARWIN PETERSON, STAFF, SENATOR STEDMAN, explained the
Committee Substitute (CS). The previous version of HB 16
was a one section bill that extended the sunset date for
the senior benefit payment program. Following the first
hearing on the bill, the chairman was concerned that
certain low income seniors were ineligible for the program.
The exclusion is found in regulation and states that in
order to be eligible for the senior benefits payment
program, an applicant may not be a resident of a nursing
home, a Pioneer home or a veteran's home. The reason for
the exclusion is because low income residents are required
to contribute most of their income to the cost of their
care. The additional cost is subsidized by the state and
Medicaid.
Mr. Peterson continued that if low income seniors in the
facilities receive the senior benefit payment they must
contribute the funds to the cost of their care which would
result in a net increase without any benefit to the client.
He mentioned one option to hold harmless senior benefit
payments for residents of these facilities, but that would
increase the fiscal note by $1.8 million. Following a
meeting with the department, another option was presented
to increase the existing personal needs allowance that
exists in statute for residents of nursing homes, Pioneer
homes and veteran's homes. Currently, residents of nursing
homes receive an allowance of $75 per month, and residents
of Pioneer homes and veteran's homes receive an allowance
of $100 per month. For residents with an income such as
social security or a pension, this provides the allowance
seniors are allowed to keep prior to turning the remainder
over for the cost of their care. For residents with no
income, the department pays the allowance. The personal
needs allowance for a nursing home resident has not changed
in 30 years. The total cost to the general fund as a result
of increasing these payments is $522,900. He mentioned the
four new fiscal notes from the Department of Health and
Social Services (DHSS).
9:07:29 AM
Mr. Peterson presented a sectional analysis. He stated that
Section 1 establishes a $200 personal needs allowance for
residents of nursing homes. Currently the allowance is
found only in regulation. The CS codifies the allowance in
statute. He continued that Section 2 amends the existing
personal needs allowance in statute for residents of
Pioneer homes and veteran's homes to $200. Section 3 AS
47.55.020(c) currently contains permissive language
allowing the department to provide personal needs allowance
to residents with no income. The CS requires the
departments to make the payment. Section 4 exempts the $200
personal needs allowance from income that must be turned
over to the state for the cost of care. Section 5 is the
original bill which extends the sunset date for the senior
benefit payment program to 2015.
9:08:15 AM
Co-Chair Stedman noted that the series of questions asked
of the department have been answered. He noted that the CS
changed the title and that the title change resolution was
drafted. He mentioned four updated fiscal notes from DHSS.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER, expressed concern regarding the
addition of the provision. The bill came into committee
with 23 House cosponsors and 15 Senate cosponsors and he
had personally committed to the governor and all previous
committees that the bill would not expand or create any new
entitlement programs. He promoted the legislation strictly
as an extension of the sunset on the senior benefits
program. He considered that the addition of the personal
needs allowance provisions ought to have a separate
legislative process including a review by the human
services committees in both the House and the Senate.
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to report SB 16 out of Committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
SCSHB 16 was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do pass"
recommendation and with four new fiscal impact notes from
the Department of Health and Social Services.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HB 16 Senate Committee Response.pdf |
SFIN 4/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| HB 16 DHSS Response 2-22-11.pdf |
SFIN 4/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| HB 16 SCS for HB 16 version D (FIN) 033011.pdf |
SFIN 4/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| HB016SCS(FIN)-DHSS-AKPH-4-1-11.pdf |
SFIN 4/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| HB016SCS(FIN)-DHSS-APA-3-31-11.pdf |
SFIN 4/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| HB016SCS(FIN)-DHSS-SBP-3-29-11.pdf |
SFIN 4/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |
| HB016SCS(FIN)-DHSS-SDMS-3-28-11.pdf |
SFIN 4/1/2011 9:00:00 AM |
HB 16 |