Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/10/1999 10:06 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 12
"An Act relating to an easement for the extension of
the Alaska Railroad to the Alaska-Canada border."
SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 12
"An Act relating to a utility corridor and railroad
right-of-way between the Alaska Railroad and the
Alaska-Canada border."
CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 12(FIN)
"An Act relating to a utility corridor and railroad
right-of-way between the Alaska Railroad and the
Alaska-Canada border."
CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 12(FIN)
am
"An Act relating to a utility corridor and railroad
right-of-way between the Alaska Railroad and the
Alaska-Canada border."
Representative JEANNETTE JAMES was invited to join the
committee. She explained HB 12 and explained her sponsor
statement.
(Arrival of Senator Donley noted at approximately 10:14
a.m.)
Representative James continued her statement before the
committee. She explained the outline of the corridor. It
was a very simple matter. She said advantages to Alaska
were obvious: resource development, tourism, job
opportunities for all areas of Alaska, with controlled
access and without the expensive maintenance problems of
other modes of transportation.
In response to a question from Senator Leman she said there
should be no fiscal note.
FRANK MIELKE, Chief of Right-of-Way, Department of
Transportation was invited to join the committee. He
explained why the route was chosen. It was a matter of
putting it on the Department of Natural Resources records.
It will be noted that this procedure was not under the
normal statutes.
Co-chair Torgerson said the right-of-way was not to be less
than five feet. Was this correct? Mr. Mielke said this
right-of-way allotment was proper in this particular case.
It was a typical practice to have an extra wide right-of-
way and then taper it down.
Senator Adams referred to some costs that may arise in the
future. Mr. Mielke said regardless of who actually does
the work or spends the money the funding would come through
the railroad. Senator Adams asked if this was stated
anywhere in the bill? Mr. Mielke said "no".
Representative James explained to the committee that the
bill notes "other interested parties".
Senator Parnell MOVED HB 12 and WITHOUT OBJECTION it was
reported out with individual recommendations and
accompanying fiscal notes; Department of Transportation and
Public Facilities, zero and the Department of Natural
Resources, zero.
Co-chair Torgerson called SB 88.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|