Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 106
03/07/2011 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Presentation(s): Sitka School District Superintendent | |
| HB5 | |
| HB104 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 104 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 5 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 5-CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY CURRICULUM
CHAIR DICK announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 5, "An Act requiring a standardized statewide
history of American constitutionalism curriculum and a secondary
school history of American constitutionalism examination in
public schools in the state; and providing for an effective
date." [In front of the committee was Version E, adopted as the
work draft on February 25, 2011.]
8:35:37 AM
REPRESENTATIVE WES KELLER provided a brief overview of the bill,
as previously heard, and stated that it was:
A mandate on school districts to teach the values of
American constitutionalism as portrayed in the
Declaration of Independence, the early states'
constitutions, the Articles of Confederation, the US
Constitution, the Federalist, and the Bill of Rights.
He cited the current world affairs as a reason for his request
of this bill at this time. He extolled the importance of
understanding the idea of inalienable rights, as they differ
from the human rights bestowed by governments. He pointed out
that it was a very broad history mandate, a "mandate-lite."
CHAIR DICK indicated his concern for an unfunded mandate.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER replied that he shared the concern but
that proposed HB 5 was to a very high level of importance. He
opined that many districts already complied, and that proposed
HB 5 was a focal point and was "worthy of doing."
8:40:23 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON asked what version of proposed HB 5 was
before the committee.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER replied that it was Version E.
8:40:59 AM
REPRESENTATIVE CISSNA remarked that Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
was more important than the constitution, and she asked if this
bill could be addressed after the basics of survival, including
schooling, were resolved.
8:42:34 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER clarified that proposed HB 5 was not a
mandate to teach the US Constitution, but to teach the values of
American constitutionalism, with the documents to be used as a
source of information. In response to Representative Cissna, he
agreed that survival was a priority, but that the importance of
these values was akin to the most fundamental core needs of
Americans. He emphasized that some of the resources supplied to
schools needed to be "directed at preserving the knowledge of
these values."
8:44:27 AM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON reminded that earlier discussion of
proposed HB 5 had clarified that the bill was not mandating a
civics classes, but centered on teaching values. He asked if
the purpose of proposed HB 5 was to teach "the values that were
in those 15 year time span."
8:45:11 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER agreed that the bill was not a civics
mandate; it was a history mandate to teach and emphasize the
values of American constitutionalism found in these early
documents.
8:47:13 AM
CHAIR DICK questioned whether a school district which offered a
five minute course with a one question examination would meet
the criteria of the bill.
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER, in response, stated that it would meet
the criteria, but not the intent of the bill.
8:47:57 AM
CHAIR DICK opined that the proposed HB 5 mandated a conversation
between a school district and its community.
8:48:25 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER offered his vision for this bill to be a
graduation requirement and a catalyst for community discussion.
8:48:56 AM
REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON noted that discussion during the four
previous hearings on the bill had included the unfunded mandate,
and the graduation requirement. She asked for a further
definition to American constitutionalism.
8:50:41 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KELLER replied that American constitutionalism
was defined in the early 19th century as a term referring to the
unique American values and it was a broad term, purposefully
selected to allow districts teaching latitude.
8:52:17 AM
REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI, reflecting on current world affairs,
shared that the Egyptian constitution was one of the oldest in
the world, and he listed the freedoms it enumerated. He also
listed many of the freedoms written in the Libyan constitution.
He suggested that it was necessary to study and compare with
other constitutions, but that he did not want a mandate, or to
teach to a test. He offered his belief that students needed to
be taught more critical thinking skills.
8:55:13 AM
CHAIR DICK opened public testimony.
8:55:32 AM
CAROL COMEAU, Superintendent, Anchorage School District, agreed
with the importance for students to understand the US
Constitution, the founding documents, and the values on which
the United States was based. She emphasized that the Anchorage
School Board and the administration were opposed to proposed HB
5 as it was an unnecessary mandate with many negative
ramifications. She listed the civics courses already required,
and that the proposed bill would only create additional barriers
for students.
8:57:29 AM
CHAIR DICK expressed a concern about "folks that are here in
this country without a knowledge of the rules by which the rest
of us play." He asked when students would receive this
information.
8:58:14 AM
MS. COMEAU replied that she was not privy to the immigration
status of students and that she was not knowledgeable about
illegal students. She pointed out that naturalization
ceremonies revealed the value of the US Constitution and
citizenship. She offered her belief that many students born in
the United States did not have this knowledge. She opined that
it was necessary to work through the current curriculum, and not
add an additional mandatory test.
9:00:00 AM
BILL MCLEOD, Superintendent, Dillingham City School District,
stated that proposed HB 5 did not meet any of the needs in his
district, as there was already a course and curriculum on
government. He paraphrased the Alaska Standards for a
government class and pointed out the similarities of these
requirements to proposed HB 5. He lauded the concept of
proposed HB 5, but stated that it was already being taught in
the schools.
9:02:56 AM
JEFF THIELBAR, PhD, Superintendent, Skagway School District,
Board Member, SERRC (Southeast Regional Resource Center),
testified that the Skagway School District was opposed to the
unfunded regulation of proposed HB 5 as it required oversight at
many levels to a curriculum which was already mandated by the
State of Alaska.
[HB 5 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Memo re Constitutionalism.pdf |
HEDC 3/7/2011 8:00:00 AM |
HB 5 |
| CSHB 5 Version E.pdf |
HEDC 3/7/2011 8:00:00 AM |
HB 5 |
| CSHB 5 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HEDC 3/7/2011 8:00:00 AM |
HB 5 |
| District APS Course Survey.pdf |
HEDC 3/7/2011 8:00:00 AM |
HB 104 |
| Workforce Investment Board Resolution.pdf |
HEDC 3/7/2011 8:00:00 AM |
HB 104 |