Legislature(2021 - 2022)GRUENBERG 120
03/17/2021 01:30 PM House JUDICIARY
Note: the audio ![]()
and video ![]()
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Alaska Police Standards Council | |
| Select Committee on Legislative Ethics | |
| HB3 | |
| HB57 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 57 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 3-DEFINITION OF "DISASTER": CYBERSECURITY
2:16:20 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN announced that the next order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 3, "An Act relating to the definition of
'disaster.'" [Before the committee was CSHB 3(STA).]
2:17:17 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN passed the gavel to Vice Chair Snyder [who
transitioned from Teams video participation to in-room presence
during this part of the meeting].
2:17:28 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN moved to adopt Amendment 1 to CSHB 3(STA), labeled
32-LS0041\G.5, Dunmire, 3/16/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 30, following "affected;":
Insert "in this subparagraph, "critical
infrastructure" means systems and assets, whether
physical or virtual, so vital to the state that the
incapacity or destruction of the systems and assets
would have a debilitating effect on security, state
economic security, state public health or safety, or
any combination of those matters;"
2:17:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND objected for the purpose of discussion.
CHAIR CLAMAN spoke to Amendment 1. He said it would add a
definition of critical infrastructure based on the federal
definition, changing the reference to the United States to "the
state".
2:18:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DELENA JOHNSON, Alaska State Legislature, as
prime sponsor of HB 3, said she is fine with Amendment 1.
2:18:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked for a definitions showing the
difference between "security" and "state economic security".
REPRESENTATIVE CLAMAN proffered that an example of security is
public security, such as a threat to the public safety database,
while a threat to the transportation of oil would be directly
related to economic security. In response to a follow-up
question, he said he thinks under the proposed legislation, the
governor would have the authority to declare an emergency if
there was a threat to the pipeline. To a further follow-up
regarding web sites, he said the answer depends on the specific
situation; a massive web site with a tremendous amount of use
that is getting threatened is different from a personal web
site. He said Amendment 1 "doesn't propose to provide that
level of definition."
2:22:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE said she likes the effort to define
critical infrastructure in terms of cybersecurity; however, she
said all the lines in Amendment 1 that reference security,
economic security, and public health and safety may be limiting
what can be done. She suggested ending the sentence following
"have a debilitating effect". She expressed concern that there
may be things that would fall under that definition that are not
listed in Amendment 1.
2:24:36 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN responded that he would not support that change
because the definition in Amendment 1 is patterned on the
federal definition and he would like the two to align so that
the federal standard informs how the state standard is applied.
2:25:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed concern that making the
definition as broad as it is would authorize the declaration of
disaster for anything.
2:26:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND noted that Amendment 1 would amend
[paragraph (2), subparagraph] (F), [which is a subparagraph
added under CSHB 3(STA)]. She highlighted the following in
subparagraph (F):
(F) a cybersecurity attack that affects critical
infrastructure in the state, an information system
owned or operated by the state
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND opined that an information system
includes any web site and data storage. She gave the example of
"My Alaska," which includes not only the permanent fund dividend
(PFD) application process, but also public official financial
disclosures and campaign disclosures. She said she thinks
Amendment 1 strengthens the definition of cyber infrastructure
and "is fine as is."
2:28:15 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN, in response to a question from Representative
Kurka, offered his view that Amendment 1 would affect only
[subparagraph] (F).
2:30:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND removed her objection to the motion to
adopt Amendment 1.
2:30:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected.
2:30:35 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, Vance, and Claman voted in favor of the motion
to adopt Amendment 1. Representatives Eastman and Kurka voted
against it. Therefore, Amendment 1 was adopted by a vote of 5-
2.
VICE CHAIR SNYDER passed the gavel back to Chair Claman.
2:31:37 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 2, labeled 32-
LS0041\G.2, Marx/Dunmire, 3/16/21, which read as follows:
Page 1, line 1, following "to":
Insert "a declaration of a disaster emergency;
and relating to"
Page 1, following line 2:
Insert new bill sections to read:
"* Section 1. AS 26.23.020(c) is amended to read:
(c) If the governor finds that a disaster has
occurred or that a disaster is imminent or threatened,
the governor shall, by proclamation, declare a
condition of disaster emergency. The disaster
emergency remains in effect until the governor finds
that the danger has passed or the disaster has been
dealt with so that the emergency no longer exists. The
governor may terminate the disaster emergency by
proclamation. A proclamation of disaster emergency may
not remain in effect longer than 30 days unless
extended by a majority of the members of the
legislature in joint session [BY A CONCURRENT
RESOLUTION]. The proclamation must indicate the nature
of the disaster, the area threatened or affected, and
the conditions that have brought it about or that make
possible the termination of the disaster emergency. A
proclamation to declare a condition of disaster
emergency must also state whether the governor
proposes to expend state funds to respond to the
disaster under (i) or (j) of this section. Unless
authorized by a majority of the members of the
legislature in joint session,
(1) the governor may not declare a
condition of disaster emergency while a declared
condition of disaster emergency remains in effect; and
(2) the governor may not declare a
condition of disaster emergency related to a condition
of disaster emergency previously declared by that
governor.
* Sec. 2. AS 26.23.210(a) is amended to read:
(a) In the event of a conflict between this
chapter and AS 26.20, including in the event the
governor declares a disaster under this chapter due to
an attack or credible threat of imminent enemy or
terrorist attack [AS DESCRIBED IN AS 26.23.900(2)],
the provisions of this chapter shall govern."
Page 1, line 3:
Delete "Section 1"
Insert "Sec. 3"
Page 1, line 6:
Delete "resulting from"
Insert "[RESULTING FROM"
Page 1, line 7, through page 2, line 30:
Delete all material and insert:
"(A) AN INCIDENT SUCH AS STORM, HIGH WATER,
WIND-DRIVEN WATER, TIDAL WAVE, TSUNAMI, EARTHQUAKE,
VOLCANIC ERUPTION, LANDSLIDE, MUDSLIDE, AVALANCHE,
SNOWSTORM, PROLONGED EXTREME COLD, DROUGHT, FIRE,
FLOOD, EPIDEMIC, EXPLOSION, OR RIOT;
(B) THE RELEASE OF OIL OR A HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCE IF THE RELEASE REQUIRES PROMPT ACTION TO
AVERT ENVIRONMENTAL DANGER OR MITIGATE ENVIRONMENTAL
DAMAGE;
(C) EQUIPMENT FAILURE IF THE FAILURE IS NOT
A PREDICTABLY FREQUENT OR RECURRING EVENT OR
PREVENTABLE BY ADEQUATE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OR
OPERATION;
(D) ENEMY OR TERRORIST ATTACK OR A CREDIBLE
THREAT OF IMMINENT ENEMY OR TERRORIST ATTACK IN OR
AGAINST THE STATE THAT THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS OR A
DESIGNEE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL, IN CONSULTATION WITH
THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY OR A DESIGNEE OF THE
COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CERTIFIES TO THE
GOVERNOR HAS A HIGH PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING IN THE
NEAR FUTURE; THE CERTIFICATION MUST MEET THE STANDARDS
OF AS 26.20.040(C); IN THIS SUBPARAGRAPH, "ATTACK" HAS
THE MEANING GIVEN UNDER AS 26.20.200; OR
(E) AN OUTBREAK OF DISEASE OR A CREDIBLE
THREAT OF AN IMMINENT OUTBREAK OF DISEASE THAT THE
COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES OR A
DESIGNEE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL
SERVICES CERTIFIES TO THE GOVERNOR HAS A HIGH
PROBABILITY OF OCCURRING IN THE NEAR FUTURE; THE
CERTIFICATION MUST BE BASED ON SPECIFIC INFORMATION
RECEIVED FROM A LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL, OR
INTERNATIONAL AGENCY, OR ANOTHER SOURCE THAT THE
COMMISSIONER OR THE DESIGNEE DETERMINES IS RELIABLE];"
2:31:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER objected for the purpose of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN spoke to Amendment 2. He said it would
remove all the reasons for the damage and focus instead on there
being damage; therefore, any widespread damage would qualify as
a disaster. Further, he said Amendment 2 would prevent there
being two disasters declared when the legislature had not
addressed the first one.
2:34:33 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN observed that Amendment 2 would require a title
change to the purpose of the bill. Further, he stated that the
proposed amendment would delve into "a whole new area about
declarations of disaster," which he said has never been the
subject of the proposed legislation. Therefore, he ruled
Amendment 2 out of order.
2:34:55 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE objected. She observed that Amendment 2
applies to Section 1 of CSHB 3(STA); therefore, she questioned
how it would be out of order.
CHAIR CLAMAN explained that part of Amendment 2 proposes a new
section not part of AS 26.23.900; it goes into AS 26.23.020,
which addresses the declaration itself as opposed to the
cybersecurity issue. He said, "This is the sort of thing we
should spend a lot more time reviewing than taking it up as an
amendment to an existing bill."
2:35:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked if it was Chair Claman's intention
to rule all amendments that change the bill title out of order.
CHAIR CLAMAN said this is not a blanket rule. He explained that
under Rule 1 in Mason's Manual, the committee is allowed to
control the debate and "not spend excessive time on things that
aren't really relevant to the matter at hand." He suggested
Representative Eastman's proper venue is to introduce a bill
taking up these issues.
2:36:47 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected.
2:36:53 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Claman voted in favor of the ruling of the
chair on Amendment 2. Representatives Vance, Eastman, and Kurka
voted against it. Therefore, the ruling of the chair was upheld
by a vote of 4-3.
2:37:57 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN ruled Amendment 3, [included in the committee
packet but never moved for adoption] out of order. He said it
brings up the subject of martial law, which had not been
discussed previously, and which he opined is well beyond the
bounds of what the committee would be discussing today.
2:38:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN asked whether Amendment 3 had been
"entered into the record."
CHAIR CLAMAN offered his understanding that Amendment 3 had been
entered into the record, since it was "circulated on [the Bill
Action & Status Inquiry System] (BASIS)."
2:38:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected to the ruling of the chair. He
said CSHB 3(STA) deals with disaster emergencies, and he opined
there is confusion on at what point an emergency becomes martial
law.
2:39:07 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Claman voted in favor of upholding the
ruling of the chair on Amendment 3. Representatives Kurka,
Vance, and Eastman voted against it. Therefore, the ruling of
the chair was upheld by a vote of 4-3.
2:39:50 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN ruled Amendment 4, [in the committee packet but
never moved for adoption], out of order.
2:39:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN objected and spoke to his objection. He
indicated the Chair Claman, through his ruling, was denying his
constituents their right to speak through the committee process.
CHAIR CLAMAN welcomed a bill from Representative Eastman
addressing these issues. He maintained that he thinks
[Amendment 4] would not be a wise use of the committee's time;
therefore, he said he would not change his ruling.
2:40:40 PM
A roll call vote was taken. Representatives Drummond, Snyder,
Kreiss-Tomkins, and Claman voted in favor of the ruling of the
chair on Amendment 4. Representatives Eastman, Kurka, and Vance
voted against it. Therefore, by a vote of 4-3, the ruling of
the chair was upheld.
2:41:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 5, labeled 32-
LS0041\G.6, Dunmire, 3/17/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 17:
Delete "cybersecurity"
Insert "cyber"
Page 2, line 22:
Delete "cybersecurity attack or cybersecurity"
Insert "cyber attack or cyber"
2:41:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS objected.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN spoke to Amendment 5. He recalled there
had been testimony supporting a broader scope to include all
cyber incidents and events, not just those where someone is
"going through the guard tower and causing the damage or
injury." He said he does not have a position on [Amendment 5],
but he explained that "it does seem to clarify the intent of the
sponsor." In response to a question from Chair Claman, he
clarified that he is offering Amendment 5 for the benefit of the
committee, not for his constituents.
2:42:44 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN noted Mark Breunig, an information security
officer, was available for questions.
2:43:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER asked to hear Mark Breunig's thoughts on
Amendment 5.
2:43:26 PM
MARK BREUNIG, Chief Information Security Officer, State Security
Office, Department of Administration, said he does not have an
issue with the change proposed under Amendment 5. He said he
thinks the intent of [CSHB 3(STA)] would be maintained.
2:43:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KREISS-TOMKINS removed his objection. There
being no further objection, Amendment 5 was [adopted].
2:44:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN moved to adopt Amendment 6, labeled 32-
LS0041\G.7, Dunmire, 3/17/21, which read as follows:
Page 2, line 22:
Delete "vulnerability"
Insert "event"
2:44:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER objected for the purpose of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN spoke to Amendment 6. He said the reason
is that the bill sponsor had said that "event" was what was
originally intended. He said he was offering the amendment but
taking no position on it. In response to a question from Chair
Claman, he explained the reason he had not combined Amendments 5
and 6 was for the purpose of clarity.
2:45:10 PM
MR. BREUNIG, in response to Chair Claman, said he thinks
"vulnerability" speaks to potential outcomes. He said "event"
is broader but does not damage "the integrity and intent of this
change."
2:45:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON, in response to Chair Claman, said she is
fine with Amendment 6 because she does not think it changes the
outcome of CSHB 3(STA).
2:46:04 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER removed her objection to Amendment 6.
There being no further objection, Amendment 6 was [adopted].
CHAIR CLAMAN invited final comments on CSHB 3(STA), as amended.
2:46:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND commented that her prior concern
regarding political subdivisions of the state had been
addressed, and they would be protected under CSHB 3(STA), as
amended.
2:47:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE VANCE expressed thanks to the bill sponsor for
bringing the proposed legislation forward to provide "more
opportunities to protect our systems in the future."
2:47:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN expressed appreciation for the proposed
bill and said he would not object to its moving forward, but he
said he has concerns with the direction it takes the state,
since it would broaden the degree to which a disaster can be
declared during a time in which "we are declaring an awful lot
more disasters than we have in the past." He opined, "... if
we're going to continue to declare these disasters going
forward, I think that points to the need for some substantive
changes in our laws, so we don't have to get around the laws by
declaring the disasters as frequently as we do."
2:48:31 PM
CHAIR CLAMAN said he appreciates the sponsor's legislation,
since it addresses concerns that have arisen since the state has
experienced cybersecurity issues and attacks in the last few
years in Alaska, and he appreciates the sponsor working with his
office on the definition of critical infrastructure. He further
expressed appreciation for the amendments brought by
Representative Eastman that offered clarity on cyber versus
cybersecurity. For those reasons, he said, he encouraged
support of CSHB 3(STA), as amended.
2:49:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER moved to report CSHB 3(STA), as amended,
out of committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB
3(JUD) was reported out of the House Judiciary Standing
Committee.
[REPRESENTATIVE SNYDER returned to her office to participate
during the final portion of the meeting via Teams.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Gregory Campbell Application 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Justin Doll Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Ed Mercer Application 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Alaska Police Standards Council Appointment - Jennifer Winkelman Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Select Committee on Legislative Ethics Appointment - Dennis Skip Cook Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| Select Committee on Legislative Ethics Appointment - Gerald Jerry McBeath Resume 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
|
| HB 3 v. G 3.8.2021.PDF |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Sponsor Statement 2.18.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Legal Memo 2.10.2020.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - Alaska Health Department Reports Data Breach The Seattle Times 6.28.2018.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - DHSS Cyber Attack Impacts More Than 100,000 Alaska Households 1.23.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - How One Alaskan Borough Survived A Cyber Attack CitiesSpeak 10.1.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - MSBD Press Release Mat-Su Declares Disaster for Cyber Attack 7.31.2018.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - Pipeline Article Alaska Public Media 3.14.2018.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Supporting Document - CISA Critical Infrastructure 2.23.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HSTA 2/23/2021 3:00:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 Fiscal Note DOA-OIT 2.21.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 v. G Amendments #1-6 HJUD 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 3 v. G Amendments #1-6 HJUD Final Votes 3.17.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |
| HB 57 v. B 2.18.2021.PDF |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Sponsor Statement 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Sectional Analysis v. B 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - OMB Letter 7.12.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - CBR Sweep Breakdown by Fund - LFD March 2020 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - AEA Memo on PCE Sweep 8.24.2019.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - Hickel v. Cowper May 27, 1994 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - Legislative Finance Outline of AS 37.10.420 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - Legislative Research Memo GF Definitions 9.1.2020.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - FY19 Single Audit - Finding No. 2019-089 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Additional Document - FY20 CAFR General Fund Accounts 3.8.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 Statement of Zero Fiscal Impact 3.6.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 57 PowerPoint Presentation 3.10.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/19/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/24/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/29/2021 1:00:00 PM HJUD 4/5/2021 1:00:00 PM |
HB 57 |
| HB 3 Testimony - Received as of 2.22.2021.pdf |
HJUD 3/10/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/15/2021 1:30:00 PM HJUD 3/17/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HB 3 |