Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2022-03-16 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2022-03-16 House Journal Page 2138 SJR 15 The following was read the second time: SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 15 Recognizing and honoring the relationship between Canada and the state; and recognizing the importance of the United States- Mexico-Canada Agreement. with the: Journal Page L&C RPT HCS(L&C) 5DP 1954 FN2: ZERO(H.L&C) 1954 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original resolution: HOUSE CS FOR SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 15(L&C) (same title) Representative Eastman objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, HCS SJR 15(L&C) was adopted. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, lines 13 - 14: Delete "democratic governance, military and economic partnerships," Insert "military and economic partnerships" 2022-03-16 House Journal Page 2139 Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Josephson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS SJR 15(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McKay, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Shaw And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Gillham: Page 1, line 16: Delete "better," Representative Gillham moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS SJR 15(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2022-03-16 House Journal Page 2140 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Patkotak, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Stutes, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Prax, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Shaw And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS SJR 15(L&C) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS SJR 15(L&C) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HCS SJR 15(L&C) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS SJR 15(L&C) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Kurka Excused: Shaw And so, HCS SJR 15(L&C) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.