Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2022-05-15 House Journal
No results found showing results without SB%20%20%209
Full Journal pdf2022-05-15 House Journal Page 2921 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 9(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, Schrage, Snyder, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Vance, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Fields, Foster, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, LeBon, McCabe, McKay, Merrick, Ortiz, Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Spohnholz, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wool Absent: McCarty, Nelson, Shaw And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Kreiss-Tomkins : Page 73, following line 6: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 51. AS 04.11.400(a), as amended by sec. 50 of this Act, is amended to read: (a) Except as provided in (f), (i), and (k) of this section and AS 04.11.405, a new license may not be issued and the board may prohibit relocation of an existing license (1) outside an established village, incorporated city, unified municipality, or organized borough if, after the issuance or relocation, in a radius of five miles of the licensed premises, excluding the populations of established villages, incorporated cities, unified municipalities, and organized boroughs that are wholly or partly included within the radius, there would be (A) more than one restaurant or eating place license for each 1,500 population or fraction of that population; (B) more than one brewery retail, one winery retail, and one distillery retail license for each 4,500 [9,000] population or fraction of that population; or (C) more than one license of each other type, except a type listed in (i) of this section, for each 3,000 population or