Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2022-05-09 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2820 SB 174 The following was before the house in second reading: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 174(L&C) "An Act relating to dress codes and natural hairstyles." Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Cronk, Tarr, and Nelson: Page 1, line 10: Delete "or" Page 1, line 12, following "hair": Insert "; or (4) prohibits a student from wearing traditional tribal regalia or objects of cultural significance at a graduation ceremony" Representative Cronk moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. 2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2821 Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Thompson and Eastman: Page 2, lines 1 - 13: Delete all material. Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Tarr objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 174(L&C) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 23 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Edgmon, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Stutes, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, lines 6-7: Delete "prohibits a student from wearing a hairstyle that is associated with race" Insert "prohibits a student from wearing a hairstyle that is associated with the student's race" Page 2, lines 4-5: Delete "prohibits an employee from wearing a hairstyle that is associated with race" 2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2822 Insert "prohibits an employee from wearing a hairstyle that is associated with the employee's race" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 174(L&C) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, lines 11-12: Delete "requires a student to permanently or semipermanently alter the student's natural hair." Insert "requires a student to employ mechanical or chemical methods or treatments to alter the natural characteristics of the student's hair." Page 2, lines 9-10: Delete "requires an employee to permanently or semipermanently alter the employee's natural hair." Insert "requires an employee to employ mechanical or chemical methods or treatments to alter the natural characteristics of the employee's hair." 2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2823 Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 174(L&C) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Johnson, Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 1, lines 8-10: Delete "prohibits a student from wearing a natural hairstyle, regardless of the student's hair texture or type; in this paragraph, "natural hairstyle" includes braids, locs, twists, tight coils, afros, cornrows, and bantu knots; or" Insert "prohibits a student from wearing a hairstyle or headwrap intended to protect the student's hair or scalp from environmental damage; or" Page 2, lines 6-8: Delete "prohibits an employee from wearing a natural hairstyle, regardless of the employee's hair texture or type; in this paragraph, "natural hairstyle" includes braids, locs, twists, tight coils, afros, cornrows, and bantu knots; or" Insert "prohibits an employee from wearing a hairstyle or 2022-05-09 House Journal Page 2824 headwrap intended to protect the employee's hair or scalp from environmental damage; or" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 174(L&C) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McKay, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Patkotak, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was not offered. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 174(L&C) am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There was objection. HCS CSSB 174(L&C) am H will advance to third reading on tomorrow's calendar.