Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-04-30 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2021-04-30 House Journal Page 0780 HB 69 The following, which was moved to the bottom of the calendar (page 778), was read the second time: 2021-04-30 House Journal Page 0781 HOUSE BILL NO. 69 "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs; capitalizing funds; amending appropriations; making reappropriations; making supplemental appropriations; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page FIN RPT CS(FIN) NEW TITLE 5DP 5NR 1AM 774 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 69(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs; capitalizing funds; amending appropriations; making capital appropriations, supplemental appropriations, and reappropriations; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date." Representative Carpenter objected. The question being: "Shall CSHB 69(FIN) be adopted in lieu of the original bill?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 69 Second Reading Adopt Finance CS YEAS: 23 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Patkotak, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky 2021-04-30 House Journal Page 0782 Nays: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Vance Excused: Spohnholz And so, CSHB 69(FIN) was adopted The Speaker stated that, without objection, the House would recess until 4:00 p.m.; and so, the House recessed at 12:45 p.m. HB 69 The following was before the house in second reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 69(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs; capitalizing funds; amending appropriations; making capital appropriations, supplemental appropriations, and reappropriations; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date." Amendment No. 1 was not offered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Gillham: Page 10, line 11: Delete "249,824,000" Insert "249,714,800" Delete "24,328,600" Insert "24,219,400" 2021-04-30 House Journal Page 0783 Page 10, line 22: Delete "1,997,800" Insert "1,888,600" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Gillham moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Story objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Story, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Patkotak, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Carpenter And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Representative Story moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2021-04-30 House Journal Page 0784 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Patkotak, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Carpenter: Page 101, following line 26: Insert a new subsection to read: "(f) The sum of $1,000,000,000 is appropriated from the earnings reserve account (AS 37.13.145) to the Department of Administration for deposit in the defined benefit plan account in the public employees' retirement system as an additional state contribution for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022." Page 106, line 9, following "(c)": Insert "and (f)" Representative Carpenter moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Edgmon objected. Representative Fields rose to a point of order regarding debate, stating that a member should not interpret another member's remarks or motives. Representative McCabe rose to a point of order requesting the member to cite the relevant rule. Representative Fields cited Section 123 of Mason's Manual. The Speaker cautioned the member to confine remarks to the amendment. 2021-04-30 House Journal Page 0785 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Patkotak, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 69(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There was objection. CSHB 69(FIN) will advance to third reading on tomorrow's calendar.