Legislature(2021 - 2022)

2021-05-10 House Journal

No results found showing results without HB%20%2069

Full Journal pdf

2021-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 0997
Representative Eastman objected.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the ruling of the Chair be sustained?"  The                                                         
roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 69(FIN) am                                                                                                                 
Sustain the ruling of the Chair                                                                                                 
Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 32/Ruled out of order                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  23   NAYS:  16   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan,                                                                        
Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCarty, Merrick,                                                                    
Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr,                                                              
Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman,                                                                    
Kurka, McCabe, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson,                                                                   
Tilton, Vance                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Patkotak                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
And so, the ruling of the Chair was sustained.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent to                                                                     
withdraw Amendment No. 32. There being no objection, it was so                                                                  
ordered.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent to                                                                     
rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No 42                                                                     
(page 969).                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
There was objection.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the House rescind previous action in                                                                
failing to adopt Amendment No 42?"  The roll was taken with the                                                                 
following result:                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 69(FIN) am                                                                                                                 
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 42                                                                                                                
Rescind                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  26   NAYS:  13   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0