Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-05-10 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2069
Full Journal pdf2021-05-10 House Journal Page 0982 Excused: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 57 was not adopted. Amendment No. 58 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 77, line 6: Delete "COSTS OF JOB RECLASSIFICATIONS." Insert "LEGISLATIVE INTENT. (a)" Page 77, following line 8: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) It is the intent of the legislature that a department that has submitted a fiscal note to the legislature promptly notify the legislative finance division if it appears that an expenditure by the department is likely to exceed the amount previously reported to the legislature." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 58 be adopted. Representative Hopkins objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 58 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 58 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 58 was not adopted.