2021-05-10                     House Journal                      Page 0978
CSHB 69(FIN) am                                                                                                                 
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 52                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  18   NAYS:  21   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman,                                                                    
Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Rasmussen, Rauscher,                                                                      
Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan,                                                                        
Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax,                                                               
Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Patkotak                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Shaw changed from "NAY" to "YEA"                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 52 was not adopted.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 53 was offered  by Representative Eastman:                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Page 77, line 6:                                                                                                                
     Delete "COSTS OF JOB RECLASSIFICATIONS."                                                                                   
     Insert "LEGISLATIVE INTENT. (a)"                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Page 77, following line 8:                                                                                                      
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
     "(b)  It is the intent of the legislature that no state funds be used to                                                   
promote the creation or expansion of a borough where one does not                                                               
already exist unless the residents in the affected jurisdiction have                                                            
expressed the desire to reside in a borough through a public vote on                                                            
the matter."                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Amendment No. 53 be adopted.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
There was objection.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 53 be adopted?"  The roll                                                             
was taken with the following result: