Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-05-10 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2069
Full Journal pdf2021-05-10 House Journal Page 0969 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCarty, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 41 was not adopted. Amendment No. 42 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 4, following line 12: Insert new material to read: "It is the intent of the legislature that this appropriation not be used to implement or maintain the collection of biometric data compatible with facial recognition software." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 42 be adopted. Representative Fields objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 42 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 42 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Tuck, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCarty, Ortiz, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Wool, Zulkosky