Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-05-01 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2069
Full Journal pdf2021-05-01 House Journal Page 0836 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 to Amendment No. 69 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 4 to Amendment No. 69 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Patkotak, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 4 to Amendment No. 69 was not adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 69 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 69(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 69 as amended YEAS: 20 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky And so, Amendment No. 69 as amended was not adopted. Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent to take up Amendment No. 71. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 71 was offered by Representative Eastman: