Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2019-04-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2019-04-10 House Journal Page 0567 HB 39 CSSSHB 39(FIN) am was before the House in second reading (page 542) with Amendment No. 66 moved and pending. Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that Representative Rauscher be excused from today to 7:00 a.m., April 11. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 66 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 39(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 66 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Johnson, Pruitt, Revak, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Vance 2019-04-10 House Journal Page 0568 Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, LeDoux, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Lincoln, Neuman, Rauscher And so, Amendment No. 66 was not adopted. The Speaker stated that, without objection, Amendment Nos. 67 and 68 would be moved to the bottom of the amendments. Amendment No. 69 was offered by Representatives Edgmon, Foster, Knopp, Stutes, Thompson, Tarr, Tuck, Josephson, Wool, Drummond, Spohnholz, Story, Hannan, Ortiz, Zulkosky, Claman, Fields, LeBon, and Kreiss-Tomkins: Page 57, line 28: Delete "sec. 23(s)" Insert "sec. 23(t)" Page 66, following line 18: Insert a new subsection to read: "(n) The sum of $49,910,250 is appropriated to the Department of Education and Early Development for state aid for costs of school construction under AS 14.11.100 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, from the following sources: (1) $16,500,000 from the School Fund (AS 43.50.140); (2) $33,410,250 from the general fund." Reletter the following subsection accordingly. Page 68, following line 25: Insert a new subsection to read: "(l) The sum of $19,694,500 is appropriated from the general fund to the regional educational attendance area and small municipal school district school fund (AS 14.11.030(a)." Reletter the following subsections accordingly. 2019-04-10 House Journal Page 0569 Page 70, line 1: Delete "(s)" Insert "(t)" Page 70, line 9: Delete "(t)" Insert "(u)" Representative Foster moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 69 be adopted. Representative Vance objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 69 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 39(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 69 YEAS: 22 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Johnston, LeDoux, Merrick, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Vance, Wilson Excused: Lincoln, Neuman, Rauscher And so, Amendment No. 69 was adopted. Amendment No. 32, which was moved to the bottom of the calendar (page 530), was offered by Representatives Johnson, Tarr, and Tuck: Page 13, line 6: Delete "17,318,300" Insert "17,497,900" Delete "9,875,200" Insert "10,054,800" 2019-04-10 House Journal Page 0570 Page 13, line 7: Delete "17,318,300" Insert "17,497,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Johnson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 32 be adopted. Representative Merrick objected. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 32 was offered by Representatives Tarr and Rauscher: Following "accordingly": Page 27, line 9: Insert new material to read: "It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Environmental Conservation continue the inspections and testing of dairies in Alaska while the department transitions to a fee-based system and fee schedule to cover the cost of inspections of Alaska's dairies, to ensure the continuation of dairy operations in the state, and safe food for all Alaskans." Representative Tarr moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 32 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 32 was adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 32 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 39(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 32 as amended YEAS: 24 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky 2019-04-10 House Journal Page 0571 Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, LeDoux, Merrick, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Vance, Wilson Excused: Lincoln, Neuman, Rauscher And so, Amendment No. 32 as amended was adopted. Amendment No. 40, which was moved to the bottom of the amendments (page 547) was offered by Representatives Hopkins, Foster, Drummond, Tuck, Story, Zulkosky, Spohnholz, Wilson, Tarr, Johnston, Fields, LeBon, Edgmon, Thompson, and Stutes: Page 16, following line 7: Insert new material to read: "It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Health and Social Services shall work with Early Head Start providers to create an equitable and geographically weighted formula for disbursement of state-funded grants to allow for the most students to be served with a comprehensive early childhood education by January 21, 2020. The department will keep the legislature informed of all allocation decisions and funding formula results." Representative Hopkins moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 40 be adopted. Representative Eastman objected. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 40 was offered by Representatives Hopkins and Wilson: Page 1, lines 1 - 7 of the amendment: Delete all material and insert: "Page 11, line 12, following "Head Start": Insert "and Early Head Start"" Representative Hopkins moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 40 be adopted. There was objection. 2019-04-10 House Journal Page 0572 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 40 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 39(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 40 YEAS: 31 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, LeDoux, Merrick, Ortiz, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Revak, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Vance, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Johnson, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton Excused: Lincoln, Neuman, Rauscher And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 40 was adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 40 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSSHB 39(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 40 as amended YEAS: 26 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, LeDoux, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Vance, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Merrick, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton Excused: Lincoln, Neuman, Rauscher And so, Amendment No. 40 as amended was adopted. The House adjourned. 2019-04-10 House Journal Page 0573 CSSSHB 39(FIN) am was automatically in third reading and will be on tomorrow's calendar.