Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2020-03-17 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1911 HB 124 The following, which was moved to the bottom of the calendar (page 1902), was read the second time: SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 124 "An Act relating to the recording of documents; relating to notaries and notarization, including notarial acts performed for remotely located individuals; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT 4DP 1DNP 1720 FN1: ZERO(DNR) 1720 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 2, line 31, through page 3, line 5: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 12, line 15: Delete "4 - 16" Insert "4 - 15" Page 12, line 16: Delete "secs. 4 - 16" Insert "secs. 4 - 15" Page 12, line 17: Delete "Sections 4 and 5 of this Act apply" Insert "Section 4 of this Act applies" Page 12, line 19: Delete "secs. 4 and 5" Insert "sec. 4" 2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1912 Page 12, line 23: Delete "sec. 15" Insert "sec. 14" Page 12, line 27: Delete "secs. 1 - 16" Insert "secs. 1 - 15" Page 12, line 29: Delete "secs. 1 - 16" Insert "secs. 1 - 15" Page 13, line 5: Delete "secs. 4 - 16" Insert "secs. 4 - 15" Page 13, line 6: Delete "sec. 15" Insert "sec. 14" Page 13, line 7: Delete "Section 18" Insert "Section 17" Page 13, line 8: Delete "sec. 20" Insert "sec. 19" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Claman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SSHB 124 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 32 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1913 Yeas: Eastman, Neuman, Rauscher, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Jackson, LeDoux, Rasmussen And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 3, lines 6 - 10: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 12, line 15: Delete "4 - 16" Insert "4 - 15" Page 12, line 16: Delete "secs. 4 - 16" Insert "secs. 4 - 15" Page 12, line 17: Delete "Sections 4 and 5 of this Act apply" Insert "Section 4 of this Act applies" Page 12, line 19: Delete "secs. 4 and 5" Insert "sec. 4" Page 12, line 23: Delete "sec. 15" Insert "sec. 14" Page 12, line 27: Delete "secs. 1 - 16" Insert "secs. 1 - 15" 2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1914 Page 12, line 29: Delete "secs. 1 - 16" Insert "secs. 1 - 15" Page 13, line 5: Delete "4 - 16" Insert "4 - 15" Page 13, line 6: Delete "sec. 15" Insert "sec. 14" Page 13, line 7: Delete "Section 18" Insert "Section 17" Page 13, line 8: Delete "sec. 20" Insert "sec. 19" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Claman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SSHB 124 Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 35 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Eastman Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt, Rauscher, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Jackson, LeDoux, Rasmussen 2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1915 Absent: Knopp And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 6, lines 3 - 6: Delete all material. Page 6, line 7: Delete "(C)" Page 6, line 9: Delete "(i)" Insert "(A)" Page 6, line 10: Delete "(ii)" Insert "(B)" Page 6, line 11: Delete "(i) of this subparagraph; in this sub-subparagraph" Insert "(A) of this paragraph; in this subparagraph" Page 6, line 15: Delete "(iii)" Insert "(C)" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Claman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SSHB 124 Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 33 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1916 Yeas: Eastman, Rauscher, Sullivan-Leonard Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Jackson, LeDoux, Rasmussen Absent: Knopp And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 3, lines 4 - 5: Delete "who is employed by the state" Insert "[WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE STATE]" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Claman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SSHB 124 Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 35 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Eastman Nays: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt, Rauscher, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Jackson, LeDoux, Rasmussen Absent: Knopp 2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1917 And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that SSHB 124 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SSHB 124 was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SSHB 124 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: SSHB 124 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt, Rauscher, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Sullivan-Leonard Excused: Jackson, LeDoux, Rasmussen And so, SSHB 124 passed the House. Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There was objection. The question being: "Shall the effective date be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SSHB 124 Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 37 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 0 2020-03-17 House Journal Page 1918 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt, Rauscher, Shaw, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Jackson, LeDoux, Rasmussen And so, the effective date was adopted. SSHB 124 was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.