Legislature(2019 - 2020)
2019-05-08 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20%2049
Full Journal pdf2019-05-08 House Journal Page 0865 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Johnson, LeDoux, Merrick, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Lincoln, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Neuman, Tuck And so, Amendment No. 3 to Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 to Amendment No. 4 was not offered. Amendment No. 5 to Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Vance: Under * Sec. 58. following "imprisonment": Delete "of not more than" Insert "at the discretion of the court" Delete: "(1) zero to three days for the first probation revocation; (2) zero to 30 [FIVE] days for the second probation revocation; or (3) [10 DAYS FOR THE THIRD PROBATION REVOCATION; OR (4)] the remainder of the suspended portion of the sentence for a third [FOURTH] or subsequent probation revocation." Representative Vance moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 to Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Claman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 to Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: