2019-04-11                     House Journal                      Page 0595
The question being:  "Shall the House adopt the appropriations from                                                             
the constitutional budget reserve fund?"  The roll was taken with the                                                           
following result:                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
CSSSHB 39(FIN) am                                                                                                               
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Constitutional Budget Reserve Appropriations                                                                                    
Reconsideration                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  24   NAYS:  14   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan,                                                                        
Hopkins, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon,                                                               
LeDoux, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck,                                                                  
Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Johnson, Merrick, Pruitt,                                                                   
Rasmussen, Rauscher, Revak, Shaw, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico,                                                                   
Tilton, Vance                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Lincoln, Neuman                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
And so, lacking the required 30 votes, the appropriations from the                                                              
constitutional budget reserve fund were not adopted, and the new title                                                          
follows:                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO.                                                                               
     39(FIN) am(brf sup maj fld)                                                                                                
     "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan                                                                   
     program expenses of state government and for certain programs;                                                             
     capitalizing funds; amending appropriations; making                                                                        
     supplemental appropriations; and providing for an effective date."                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative Thompson moved the effective date clause.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?"  The                                                         
roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CSSSHB 39(FIN) am(brf sup maj fld)                                                                                              
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Effective Date                                                                                                                  
Reconsideration                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  31   NAYS:  7   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0