2019-04-09                     House Journal                      Page 0517
Amendment No. 3 was offered  by Representative Eastman:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Page 52, following line 6:                                                                                                      
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
     "(c)  It is the intent of the legislature that no state funds be used to                                                   
promote the creation or expansion of a borough where one does not                                                               
already exist unless the residents in the affected jurisdiction have                                                            
expressed the desire to reside in a borough through a public vote on                                                            
the matter."                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Amendment No. 3 be adopted.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson objected.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?"  The roll                                                              
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSSSHB 39(FIN)                                                                                                                  
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 3                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  6   NAYS:  32   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson, Neuman, Rauscher, Revak                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan,                                                                        
Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp,                                                                             
Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, LeDoux, Ortiz, Pruitt, Rasmussen, Shaw,                                                                  
Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr,                                                                     
Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Lincoln, Merrick                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 4 was offered  by Representative Eastman:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Page 52, following line 6:                                                                                                      
     Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                           
     "(c)  It is the intent of the legislature that an employment contract                                                      
that requires legislative approval be presented to the legislature at least                                                     
one week before the approval is requested."