Legislature(2019 - 2020)

2020-02-26 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

2020-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 1705
HB 234                                                                                                                        
The following was read the second time:                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     HOUSE BILL NO. 234                                                                                                         
     "An Act making supplemental appropriations, reappropriations,                                                              
     and other appropriations; amending appropriations; capitalizing                                                            
     funds; making appropriations under art. IX, sec. 17(c),                                                                    
     Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget                                                        
     reserve fund; and providing for an effective date."                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
with the:                                                            Journal Page                                               
                                                                                                                                
 FIN RPT CS(FIN) 7DP 4AM                                                      1699                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                  
the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original                                                           
bill:                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 234(FIN)                                                                                             
     (same title)                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representative Eastman:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Page 12, line 17, following "settlements":                                                                                      
     Insert "in the following amounts"                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                

2020-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 1706
Page 12, line 18:                                                                                                               
     Delete "."                                                                                                                 
     Insert ":                                                                                                                  
 CASE                                                                        AMOUNT                                             
 Mungle v. DCCED, Division of Insurance         $        131,700                                                                
 Jason Carter v. DOT&PF                                           4,950,000                                                     
          Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. Streur     805,883"                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Foster objected.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?"  The roll                                                              
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 234(FIN)                                                                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 1                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  3   NAYS:  34   EXCUSED:  3   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Carpenter, Eastman, Jackson                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis, Hannan,                                                                
Hopkins, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp, Kopp,                                                                             
Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt,                                                                    
Rasmussen, Rauscher, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard,                                                                
Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  LeDoux, Lincoln, Shaw                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 2 was offered  by Representative Eastman:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Page 12, line 15:                                                                                                               
     Delete "$5,887,583"                                                                                                        
     Insert "$5,081,700"                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Page 12, line 17, following "settlements":                                                                                      
     Insert "in the following amounts"                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                

2020-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 1707
Page 12, line 18:                                                                                                               
     Delete "."                                                                                                                 
     Insert ":                                                                                                                  
          CASE                                                                        AMOUNT                                    
          Mungle v. DCCED, Division of Insurance         $        131,700                                                       
          Jason Carter v. DOT&PF                                        4,950,000."                                             
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Amendment No. 2 be adopted.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Pruitt objected.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Representative Claman rose to a point of order regarding confining                                                              
remarks to the amendment.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker ruled the member out of order.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kopp rose to a point of order, citing Section 121 of                                                             
Mason's Manual, regarding ignoring the question.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker upheld the point of order.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?"  The roll                                                              
was taken with the following result:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 234(FIN)                                                                                                                   
Second Reading                                                                                                                  
Amendment No. 2                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  1   NAYS:  36   EXCUSED:  3   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Eastman                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis,                                                             
Hannan, Hopkins, Jackson, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp,                                                                  
Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Neuman, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt,                                                              
Rasmussen, Rauscher, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard,                                                                
Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  LeDoux, Lincoln, Shaw                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                

2020-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 1708
Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                  
CSHB 234(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading,                                                               
and placed on final passage.  There being no objection, it was so                                                               
ordered.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 234(FIN) was read the third time.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman rose to a point of order, citing Section 90 of                                                           
Mason's Manual, regarding the right to debate questions.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kopp, citing Section 122 of Mason's Manual, stated                                                               
that the point was irrelevant at this time.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker advised the member to proceed with remarks to the bill.                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman appealed the ruling of the Chair.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kopp, citing Section 122 of Mason's Manual, stated the                                                           
appeal was not in order.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker stated that the point was well taken.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Representative Eastman rose to a point of order regarding the                                                                   
recognition of members by the presiding officer.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker cautioned the member to speak to the bill before the                                                                
body.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative Kopp rose to a point of order, citing Section 121 of                                                             
Mason's Manual, regarding the proper decorum when not recognized.                                                               
                                                                                                                                
The Speaker ruled that the point was well taken and cautioned the                                                               
member to confine remarks to the bill.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 234(FIN) pass the House?"  The                                                                 
roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 234(FIN)                                                                                                                   
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Final Passage                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  35   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  3   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                

2020-02-26                     House Journal                      Page 1709
Yeas:  Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis,                                                             
Hannan, Hopkins, Jackson, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp,                                                                  
Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt,                                                                      
Rasmussen, Rauscher, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard,                                                                
Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman, Neuman                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  LeDoux, Lincoln, Shaw                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
And so, CSHB 234(FIN) passed the House.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative Thompson moved that the appropriations from the                                                                  
constitutional budget reserve fund (Article IX, Section 17(c),                                                                  
Constitution of the State of Alaska) be adopted.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the House adopt the constitutional budget                                                           
reserve fund appropriations?"  The roll was taken with the following                                                            
result:                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 234(FIN)                                                                                                                   
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Constitutional Budget Reserve Appropriations                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  35   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  3   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Carpenter, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillis,                                                             
Hannan, Hopkins, Jackson, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Knopp,                                                                  
Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Prax, Pruitt,                                                                      
Rasmussen, Rauscher, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard,                                                                
Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman, Neuman                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  LeDoux, Lincoln, Shaw                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
And so, the constitutional budget reserve fund appropriations were                                                              
adopted.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Thompson moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                  
the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                     
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 234(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.