Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-05-11 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20355
Full Journal pdf2018-05-11 House Journal Page 3680 SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 355(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 355(JUD) Concur YEAS: 31 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Kawasaki, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman, Johnson, Josephson, Neuman, Rauscher, Reinbold, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Knopp And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting SCS CSHB 355(JUD). Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment. HB 398 Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 3671) on the following: