Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2018-03-22 House Journal
No results found showing results without HB%20286
Full Journal pdf2018-03-22 House Journal Page 2841 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 70 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 286(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 70 YEAS: 39 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Eastman And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 70 was adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 70 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 286(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 70 as amended YEAS: 39 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lincoln, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wilson, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Kito And so, Amendment No. 70 as amended was adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent to rescind previous action on Amendment No. 66 (page 2823). There being no objection, it was so ordered.